- Joined
- 2 March 2009
- Posts
- 18
- Reactions
- 0
Don't underestimate the validity of such a sentiment. Life isn't just about financial rewards. Pride of ownership, sense of security and simply really enjoying one's home environment is to some of us more important than flipping over properties purely for financial gain........a strategy born more from sentiment than financial rigor?
I live in Sydney, only 36, and owning a home is just not a priority ... I have chosen to rent, and 'trade'.
I was speaking with a friend, who told me her long time boyfriend, was heavily invested in shares, and decided to margin lend, just before the crash ... and lost big time, my comment was he was still young, and plenty of time to recover, her comment was he was 39, not young (I disagreeded but anyhow) ... they were thinking of marrying, having kids, and she would like to buy to 'settle down' ... so rebuilding is not want she wanted to do ... I think Sydney is a pretty stressful place , particularly when talking about property .... most capital cities are these days ... Adelaide looks more reasonable, and also outside of capitals, in terms of deposit vs loan amount, except for beach towns.
Problem is for those wanting to do down the old path of couple with kids, and a place with enough rooms (2 or more and abit of land at the back) and perhaps a small study, and living somewhere that takes around 45 mins to get to work .... it's not that easy to find anymore, particularly in Sydney.
Anyhow ... not easy, I have read reports compared to income, Australia has become one of the most expensive countries. If you can afford to own your own home, and as Julia said there are many other benefits, then yes, it is a sound strategy.
Essentially, I am struggling to come up with a sound financial reason to own a home.
110% behind this. Maybe 120%! How do you put a value on owning your own nest? It's not just a marketing ploy imo, but pure human psychology.Don't underestimate the validity of such a sentiment. Life isn't just about financial rewards.
wow 50-60% taken up with the house...why is that ? it should be about 30% of household income...
have you accounted for growth in your wages and income for the future...and the loan should be reducing as the years go by...
you cannot sell up and buy a cheaper home further out ???
balance mate. Owning a house isn't a financial decision. Unless you make it a financial interest, it's your home. Some people can live in a tent, some people need to have a bedroom with a view. I guess the word is excessive. Buy and live within your means, don't over do it.
This is the crux of my question... balance.
Is paying 50-60% of my net income, without reducing any principle may I add (that would take approx. 80%), for an asset than in 20 years will comprise over, say, 80% of my total weath, a good decision even when you factor in the completely valid points about it being a home, not a pure asset etc...
I have absolutely not problem with home ownership, and in an ideal world I would certainly like to have my cake and eat it (ie. a family home that costs and comprises approx. 20-30% of my total income/wealth). But nowadays, particularly in the capital cities, this is very hard to achieve.
I would love to own and live in a family home... I'm just not sure that the balance is right given current house prices in Oz, and my current level of income.
Jpldavis, it is all in the long term when it comes to houses, we bought ten years ago in brown way Karrinyup $91,100. six months ago was worth 800kto900K to day only$750,000, the second place is in in Shepherd st Beaconsfield, this cost $146,000, six months ago 900K, to day it is back to800K. With real estate look long term and you will be a winner.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?