Reply to thread

And again, we see the alarmist go on emotional rants (note the frequent use of CAPS etc) and failing to stay relevant or make logical connections. The strawman tactic is used, as usual, and this time the entire post is more or less a strawman.

Here we see the emotional use of CAPS, an irrelevant strawman which isn't quite true (it's fine to question the age of the permafrost, but no one here has disputed it), irrelevant reference to the accuracy of carbon dating since no one has questioned it, complaints about something irrelevant not being addressed...

Clear loss of ability to compose emotion, and here we see the alarmist hypocritically make the assumption that the entire world must warm evenly. As we typically see with the alarmists, they will happily point out cold weather or prehistoric warm periods as anomalies or regional exceptions, but when it suits their agenda, a localised example is hypocritically used as evidence for the entire system, no doubt being the cause of the emotional nature of the outburst and lack of sense.

Strawman tactic again.

More emotional strawman tactics. Completely irrelevant too. No one disputed it, yet the alarmist for some reason claims it during the emotional rant.

The alarmist is presumably oblivious to the fact that many factors such as changing air and water currents, continental drift, localised climates, etc, can cause things to remain frozen or thaw out at times which don't correspond with the average global temperature. It is interesting that the alarmist maintains the capacity to point out the existence of localised temperature anomalies when it suits the agenda but in a tantrum, act like such things don't exist when it suits the agenda.

Yet again, the alarmist continues with an irrelevant strawman, making baseless and false assertions.

As above.

The emotional tantrum continues and as is often the case, ad hominem attacks are used.

Interestingly, the alarmist is so deranged that he concocts a theory imagined in the mind of someone else and adds it to a list he is keeping which he believes came from someone else. Literally projecting his own imagination of a bizarre theory into the mind of another person and literally believing that person came up with the theory!

And as seems to be a pattern, the post ends on a particularly bizarre note.

When some alarmists are behaving like this, and other vocal climate change deniers support them or say nothing, it is no wonder that many people are driven to take a completely contrarian point of view. People do tend to want to belong to groups and see people as being part of one group or another, and many people would not want to be in the same group as someone making such insane posts.