- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,622
- Reactions
- 7,495
Having withdrawls suspended is not good news for crypto generally. When withdrawls for anything are restricted, that creates one thing: fear. Specifically, fear that those affected will not be able to withdraw their currency, and that their capital will eventually be worth nothing. This fear will lead to mass withdrawls when they again become available, because "anything is better than nothing".
I still believe that the real fallout from the FTX collapse is yet to be felt. What happened there is, by all accounts, so scandalous and damaging that the ramifications will be severe and broadly felt. My gut feeling is that December is going to be a bad month for crypto.
in the short term it's not good news, but longer term i think it's a healthy thing. crypto was originally founded upon the ethos of decentralisation and self-custody, it's been slowly drifting away from that due to emergence of all these centralised entities and all the fancy marketing they've spewed out. with the bad actors slowly being weeded out and trust in centralised entities diminishing, that should push the community back to the core ethos. if it takes further falls in the market to get there, then so be it.
i've seen some articles/videos recently that claim on-chain analytics show the amount of crypto held on exchanges is dropping rapidly, but they are not being swapped back to fiat, they are being withdrawn to self-custodial wallets.
The rise of interest bearing deposits never really made any sense to me, clearly the deposit takers were simply using the funds to punt and FTX looks to have been a significant punter.
Except that interaction with crypto exchanges or brokers (not peer to peer) is necessary to buy and sell say Bitcoin, then you initiate a transfer to your cold wallet for self-custody. So engagement with centralized entities is necessary to buy/sell Bitcoin or convert to fiat. The aversion to using self-custodial wallets is understandable to some degree. Stories of forgotten passwords and lost wallets (like the guy in Wales who offered to pay the local council to excavate the local landfill tip to recover his hard drive and $100 million in Bitcoin) etc. is enough for many to preference holding crypto on exchanges.this is not the fault of the system itself, which was founded on decentralisation and self-custody, as i wrote above. it's the fault of bad/greedy centralised entities within that system, and i think a lot of people in general aren't differentiating between the two, instead they equate the failure of Celsius, FTX etc. as the failure of the entire ecosystem.
Except that interaction with crypto exchanges or brokers (not peer to peer) is necessary to buy and sell say Bitcoin, then you initiate a transfer to your cold wallet for self-custody. So engagement with centralized entities is necessary to buy/sell Bitcoin or convert to fiat. The aversion to using self-custodial wallets is understandable to some degree. Stories of forgotten passwords and lost wallets (like the guy in Wales who offered to pay the local council to excavate the local landfill tip to recover his hard drive and $100 million in Bitcoin) etc. is enough for many to preference holding crypto on exchanges.
So the contrarian in me would suggest its time to get into it.CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Monday told investors that they still have time to sell their cryptocurrency holdings.
“You can’t just beat yourself up and say, ‘hey, it’s too late to sell.’ The truth is, it’s never too late to sell an awful position, and that’s what you have if you own these so-called digital assets,” he said.
The collapse of FTX, the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange that was worth $32 billion at its peak, has thrown the crypto space under intense scrutiny and spurred mounting losses in a market that has seen digital assets get pummeled by the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes.
Cramer, who has warned against staying in speculative assets while the Fed continues to tighten the economy, reiterated his argument and said that investors shouldn’t be fooled by some coins’ inflated market capitalization.
He added that he expects more marginal names including XRP, dogecoin, Cardano and Polygon to fall much further, possibly to zero.
“Tether, a so-called stablecoin that’s supposed to be kinda-sorta pegged to the dollar, still has a $65 billion market cap,” he said, adding, “There’s still a whole industry of crypto boosters trying desperately to keep all of these things up in the air — not too different from what happened with bad stocks during the dotcom collapse.”
FWIW. Locally, last night at the recently opened OTR servo I noted the advert accepting crypto payments.
Google Fu reveals OTR
World first - OTR offers in-store Cryptocurrency Payments
More than 1 million Australians currently own cryptocurrencies*** at an average individual value of more than $20,000
Doing business with Crypto.com entails significant business risk, CEO Kris Marszalek has a shady past...A service station accepting crypto for what are a routine, relatively low value transactions. OK, I can see the point if it gets them more customers - whatever sells fuel and things from the shop makes them money.
So, presuming such figures are roughly correct, that figure 12 months ago would have been close to $60 billion. That's already a lot of paper wealth destruction for 2022.So there's over $20 billion worth in the hands of Australians?
So in round figures about 1% of GDP. Not massive but not totally insignificant either. In the event of an outright crypto collapse, there'd be at least some impact on the real economy wouldn't there?
So there's over $20 billion worth in the hands of Australians?
The only references I could find on OTR Convenience Stores search on duckduckgo was a website which was of little value in finding stores or what is sold there and a court case where they were found guilty of under and not paying workers.
- There is significant interest in having the ability to make and receive payments directly in cryptocurrency, with 55% of both merchants and consumers saying they want to transact in cryptocurrency
- But why? Just whip out your phone and use ApplePay or a credit card. The only reason to hold crypto is because, using whatever hopeful logic, one believes it's going to increase in price.
- Both merchants and consumers prefer to transact in Bitcoin and Ethereum but there is significant demand for an Australian dollar stablecoin
- But why? If you transact in crypto you potentially create a taxable event and the mantra now is hodl and never sell anyway
- Both merchants and consumers (32% and 35%, respectively) would like to have the option of transacting online and in-store, but consumers are more focused on online
- But why? You have so many secure options to buy online without using crypto
- One third of merchants say they are or will be ready within a year to transact in cryptocurrencies, and 60% within three years
- But why? Presumably one more option using crypto as an intermediary to transact will increase sales?
- The lack of regulation, price volatility, and to a lesser extent, uncertainty about the tax implications, remain barriers to wider adoption of cryptocurrency transactions
- Volatility, entirely on the downside. How many FTT tokens do you need now to buy a cup of coffee? With the vast majority of crypto "investors" drowning in red ink and their tokens going to zero at the speed of light, such a facility is unlikely to resuscitate the crypto corpse.
So $20k on average per person but I would think it’s mainly people under 45 years old.A service station accepting crypto for what are a routine, relatively low value transactions. OK, I can see the point if it gets them more customers - whatever sells fuel and things from the shop makes them money.
What did come to my attention though is this bit:
So there's over $20 billion worth in the hands of Australians?
So in round figures about 1% of GDP. Not massive but not totally insignificant either. In the event of an outright crypto collapse, there'd be at least some impact on the real economy wouldn't there?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?