Sean K
Moderator
- Joined
- 21 April 2006
- Posts
- 22,307
- Reactions
- 11,592
Market Cap, but the spead sheet automatically calculates that.Great idea. What does MC (m) stand for? Also would you consider add Debt level.
Thanks Prawn, will add it in.Perhaps also an EV (enterprise value) column in there K. MC - cash + debt is the formula i think...
Can I just use your MC - cash + debt for ease of comparison?
Would appreciate some help from any interested punters.
I'd say anyone except BHP, RIO, FMG, AQA, TTY maybe. Probably anyone who is still exploring, or only just started producing. GRR and SDL might fit the bill, but they're fairly well developed. Maybe a MC under 500m ish is a guide. Thoughts?Like to help out Kennas, but I am a newbie. What identifies a junior, and is it for Aussie mines or just ASX listed and do they have to be IO producers?
Two I can think of are GRR Grange Resources, SDL Sundance but not sure they qualify for your list.
Tegards
JB
Thanks Prawn, I've added that to the sheet, but follows the DSO and Mag JORCs.Hey Kennas and others,
I have added a 'Price per m/t' section, menaing that now you can compare how much you are paying per m/t of IO for each company.
3 seperate cols, based on DSO, Mag, or total, dependng on what your looking at comparing.
EDIT - Have not added in Graces pick as she posted as i was typing
I was going to do fully diluted, but it didn't seem to make much difference to the overall value, and who's to say they get excised? Actually, I think I was just feeling lazy... Maybe we should include them?Cool table. How are you dealing with options?
It probably makes sense to include them when they're ITM. It won't make much of a difference very often, but every now and then you come across a company that has a large number of options that create a significant overhang and are therefore worth knowing about.I was going to do fully diluted, but it didn't seem to make much difference to the overall value, and who's to say they get excised? Actually, I think I was just feeling lazy... Maybe we should include them?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?