- Joined
- 15 November 2006
- Posts
- 1,206
- Reactions
- 679
Yep, and I'm not so sure we'll be on the winning sideI'm into futuristic shows e.g. The Last of Us. and no one survives by shaving bits of gold from their hoard.
It's always about generators, growing your own food and being useful. Once the communication networks fail everything collapses
WayneL would be OK with his blacksmith skills.
In the end, if WW3 happens, then the most important consideration to holding onto wealth is to be on the winning side at the end of it.
Must be a slow day or you wouldn't have commentedaccidentally wander into the ‘general chat’ forum, which I do not permit myself to visit?
I’ll pay that!Must be a slow day or you wouldn't have commented
It's a valid question. We could very well be in the initial stages and if so, it will profoundly affect our investment decisions. It therefore wouldn't be unreasonable to involve some speculation on the progress of that which may have such effect.Did I miss something, or did I accidentally wander into the ‘general chat’ forum, which I do not permit myself to visit?
Unless the internet....I find it hard to imagine Gold actually being of any great significance in one of these doomsday scenarios. It serves no practical purpose other than being a traditional 'store of value'. I doubt you're going to be exchanging real goods for gold coins any time in the future.
That might have been useful pre-internet, but these days we have loads of options via which to store value, and unless the internet and digital markets are severely disrupted/wiped out, I can imagine speculating on where to invest would only increase under such a scenario as wealth/assets search for a safe haven.
If we aren't already in it, it looks like it is almost inevitable now. I'm no military analyst, but I think the West will lose this one, unless the Americans have something pretty spectacular up their sleeve.
If so, and given than it could easily be a nuclear exchange, how would this effect the investment *moonscape?
I guess PMs are a good go to, maybe baked bean suppliers? Otherwise, what?
Spot on IMO Sean, Israel today knocking down an ICBM, would have startled some.Nah, the West is still well ahead. It's not just the US but them and their Allies. It's how Germany lost WW1 and 2 because they didn't calculate on England's allies coming to the rescue.
At least it will solve global warming and solve overpopulation in one fell swoop, Bas.Does WW3 involve nuclear weapons ? Roughly how many ? If by some miracle we are not all incinerated by nuclear blasts or radiation what do we do when the Nuclear Winter scenario kick in ?
What could a nuclear war do to the climate — and humanity?
A new study on “nuclear winter” estimates that as many as 5 billion people could die from starvation.www.vox.com
At least it will solve global warming and solve overpopulation in one fell swoop, Bas.
You should be in favour.
Solar power would be stuffed.At least it will solve global warming and solve overpopulation in one fell swoop, Bas.
You should be in favour.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?