Yes. One of the best I've read.
Buffett also think so too. I think Buffett rates Fisher up there, or higher, than Graham. But in my opinion Graham is somewhat misunderstood to be a "value" [cheap stocks] whereas Fisher look more at the quality and "growth" rather than getting an accounting bargain.
Unfair in that Graham talk plenty, and know plenty, about "growth" and quality. Just that I think him having gone through the Great Depression, maybe even personality wise.... he like stocks that are cheap and quality and growth, while he know about it, he'd rather not get into it.
----------
I guess it depends on how we approach investing.
If we see stocks as a commodity to be traded, as a financial instruments where we buy low and sell at a higher price... Then I'm sure there are plenty of books and methods out there. I'm not saying anything's wrong with such approach, I mean we're all here to make money and whatever dependable way we can do it, sure.
But if we approach stocks as the ownership of a business, a share in the earnings and growth of that business where owning one single share should be approached as though we were to own the entire company...
Then I don't think there's any more reading than Fisher, Graham, speeches and essays by Buffett and Munger.
I also like what Peter Lynch wrote too. But like most other books, they provide context rather than anything new or much more insightful into the "art" of business investing through stock/share ownership.
An Australian example would be what Roger Montgomery discusses. I saw a few of his ASX lectures and interviews. The quality stuff he talks about he picked up directly from Graham. And while I'm at it, he's wrong in the way he prices a business as well. Yea I know, telling a high powered fund manager he's wrong from my little shed
----------
The way I learnt investing was basically read those books above... understand their principles... i.e. study the stock as you would an entire business.
Then learn the updated accounting side of what Graham talks about. For example. When Graham wrote his "interpretation of financial statements", and way until quite recently, the Statement of Cash Flows weren't in the report. I'm sure there are plenty of changes to certain accounting standards etc. too....
But fundamentally, you're studying a business and accounting is very helpful in understanding the company's financial position and performance.
So you then either learn and know how to read financial statements accurately... or set up a spreadsheet... or use my little app
But accounting is historical. Business is about the future of course. Though I wouldn't stray too far into the future with hopes and dreams as that would be what Graham called "speculation".
I find that buying higher quality businesses, selling at (un)reasonably low prices tend to work out better than jumping into more speculative stocks. But what's speculation and what's "real" do have a lot to do with how much you know the business and how little you care for your money being gone if/when it goes down with dreams of world domination.