New posts

Reply to thread

Message

I never quite understood this. Why are things like wages preferred to be linked to things like productivity via a legislative framework? I heard an AMP report today that indicated that since 1986, house prices had increased 400% but wages only 120%. Why should wages be constrained by anything other the same forces that constrain commodities and asset prices which can also affect inflation?

[QUOTE="Some Dude, post: 272537, member: 2442"] I never quite understood this. Why are things like wages preferred to be linked to things like productivity via a legislative framework? I heard an AMP report today that indicated that since 1986, house prices had increased 400% but wages only 120%. Why should wages be constrained by anything other the same forces that constrain commodities and asset prices which can also affect inflation? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!

To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.

Already a member? Log in here.

This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

Accept Learn more...