Normal
The numbers are already provided, but here they are again:[ATTACH=full]136212[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]136213[/ATTACH]So in the same order moving L to R: TSLA, F, GM, TM:Return on investment (ROI) has TSLA slightly ahead at 5%, which is still a real negative return if using CPI inflation at 7%. But of course the more accurate figure is the PPI number which for 2021 was 9.7%. Which provides a return of (- 4.7%). The reason that we use the PPI is because TSLA is a manufacturer sourcing raw materials and selling to consumers, the CPI number.The PPI is knifing higher, which is why CPI numbers are driving higher: producers are trying to pass their cost structure forward to the end consumer.So TSLA is the best of a bad bunch (industry) at least as far as these examples demonstrate. Possibly Volkswagon might have better numbers.So as regards 'productivity' TSLA does not outrun inflation. Not even close.jog onduc
The numbers are already provided, but here they are again:
[ATTACH=full]136212[/ATTACH][ATTACH=full]136213[/ATTACH]
So in the same order moving L to R: TSLA, F, GM, TM:
Return on investment (ROI) has TSLA slightly ahead at 5%, which is still a real negative return if using CPI inflation at 7%. But of course the more accurate figure is the PPI number which for 2021 was 9.7%. Which provides a return of (- 4.7%). The reason that we use the PPI is because TSLA is a manufacturer sourcing raw materials and selling to consumers, the CPI number.
The PPI is knifing higher, which is why CPI numbers are driving higher: producers are trying to pass their cost structure forward to the end consumer.
So TSLA is the best of a bad bunch (industry) at least as far as these examples demonstrate. Possibly Volkswagon might have better numbers.
So as regards 'productivity' TSLA does not outrun inflation. Not even close.
jog on
duc
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.