Duckman#72 said:
Hi Joe
It's great that ASF continues to set the standard for stock forum sites and is getting the plaudits it deserves - with the membership now closing in on 5000.
However when you look at the members there are a number who have registered and never logged back on since that original registration day. No posts - no contibutions and apparently no more interest in ASF.
I guess it doesn't bother me but I just like the idea of cleaning up the database so that current and regular users are left. What are the legal requirements of ASF for people who register as members? Is there a period of inactivity that drops them off the members list?
Call me "old fashioned" but it seemed more friendly and familiar when the number of members were half what they are today.
Keep up the good work
Duckman
I'd have to agree, Duckman. I'm sure, though, that such a comment is in no way a reflection on the way the site is moderated which is simply first class.
Thanks, Joe, Wayne, Rich, DoctorJ, and CTP. Your vigilance and care is much appreciated.
It just seems that where once there was a sense of being part of a supportive community, there is now much more a competitive and argumentative element. I'm all for discussion of controversial topics but it's disappointing when almost inevitably disagreement which should be handled objectively descends into vituperative personal attacks.
Some many months ago, if a newcomer posted a question which may have appeared naive and even silly to more experienced members, they would nonetheless have been assured of a constructive and courteous response.
These days, it's just as likely they will receive a smart and condescending reply which is useful to no one and could just knock an aspiring investor right out of a growing interest in the market.
Perhaps we can ask ourselves why we are here? Is it to demonstrate our superiority and greater knowledge, or is it to appreciate that almost everyone has something to offer in some area of experience or interest.
With best wishes to all
Julia