- Joined
- 28 March 2011
- Posts
- 87
- Reactions
- 0
snsdmonkey;813014[B said:Comments:[/B] I've draw in an uptrend channel, bought on a green Force Index and turning of the MACD. I am not quite sure the bottom support is drawn correctly though, could it be moved up a bit or is this one fine?
BHP reporting on 18 Feb. What's the plan there?
It looks like you have used your view of the market to shape your trend lines. They have no value this way. They are biased lines. Trend lines must shape your view rather than the other way around.
I'm no expert ...Could you explain what you mean by this, I don't quite understand what you mean
I'm no expert ...
You are showing trendlines as a channel with a distinct uptrend.
If you pick points nearer the Share Price Action, you may find the channel is going sideways.
Can you afford to lose as much as 8% of your capital?
Your call, ... and none of my business.
Good luck with your first trade!
It looks like you have used your view of the market to shape your trend lines. They have no value this way. They are biased lines. Trend lines must shape your view rather than the other way around.
What is wrong with his trend lines. Its showing a channel and that is what he is trading.Are you saying because its not a perfect line where the stock turned on a dime at the straight trend line its invalidated as a channel?
Thanks for point that out, that was the exact issue I was having with these trendlines. That would make the recent BHP action just a correction, and my entry point not that great ...
... The trade only risks about 0.5% of my capital?
What is wrong with his trend lines. Its showing a channel and that is what he is trading.Are you saying because its not a perfect line where the stock turned on a dime at the straight trend line its invalidated as a channel?
Some RANDOM thoughts:... Target: $38.00 ...
Well I look at it like this. It's the same chart but my trend lines are parallel. His must not be. As you can see, the stock is making lower highs but higher lows. The stock has also passed through the trend channel.
It's a completely different view of the same situation and all I did was zoomed out a bit and drew it from the low of the bar before the hammer he drew his from and did a parallel line at the top. It looks like my data (EOD yahoo on Amibroker) is presented very differently to his too. It's like it's on a different scale. I have prorealtime for free through IG Markets. I can't match the same trendlines as he did on Amibroker but I can on prorealtime. I double checked the data and it's the same. My amibroker is using automatic linear scaling (the scale it uses out of the box).
Burglar 8% capital risk per trade is absurdly high considering most people only have 50% or lower win rates. If that's the case, ever see a roulette wheel go black 13 times in a row? It will happen. Risk of ruin would be unacceptable.
After 13 unsuccessful trades at 8% capital risked per trade, the trader should still have approximately 1/3 of his/her starting capital!Burglar 8% capital risk per trade is absurdly high considering most people only have 50% or lower win rates. If that's the case, ever see a roulette wheel go black 13 times in a row? It will happen. Risk of ruin would be unacceptable.
Burglar 8% capital risk per trade is absurdly high considering most people only have 50% or lower win rates. If that's the case, ever see a roulette wheel go black 13 times in a row? It will happen. Risk of ruin would be unacceptable.
... learn about stopping out often or learn about losing big money.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?