Dona Ferentes
beware the aedes of marsh
- Joined
- 11 January 2016
- Posts
- 16,856
- Reactions
- 23,022
Net assets* ($A) | $192,325,565 |
---|---|
Units outstanding* (#) | 15,331,365 |
Management fee and cost** (p.a.) | 0.72% |
Distribution frequency | Monthly |
Distribution reinvestment plan (DRP) | Full or partial participation available |
I've been noticing ads on ASF for this.
indeed , it has been a bit of a capital vacuum , however i participate in the DRP and will probably not buy any extras until i feel the market has bottomed out
CODE | COMPANY | ASSET |
---|---|---|
A200 | BetaShares Australia 200 ETF | 27.94% |
CBA | Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 11.20% |
QRE | BetaShares Australian Res Sect ETF | 6.27% |
CSL | CSL Ltd | 5.82% |
FMG | Fortescue Ltd | 4.90% |
CODE | COMPANY | ASSET |
---|---|---|
WES | Wesfarmers Ltd | 4.23% |
TCL | Transurban Group | 3.45% |
TLS | Telstra Group Ltd | 3.22% |
WDS | Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 2.81% |
COL | Coles Group Ltd | 2.45% |
CODE | COMPANY | ASSET |
---|---|---|
BHP | BHP Group Ltd | 43.93% |
WDS | Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 10.77% |
RIO | Rio Tinto Ltd | 8.68% |
FMG | Fortescue Ltd | 7.37% |
STO | Santos Ltd | 3.97% |
CODE | COMPANY | ASSET |
---|---|---|
NST | Northern Star Resources Ltd | 2.68% |
S32 | South32 Ltd | 2.61% |
MIN | Mineral Resources Ltd | 1.90% |
PLS | Pilbara Minerals Ltd | 1.83% |
ALD | Ampol Ltd | 1.53% |
the yield was tempting , the capital depreciation came later , the compounding via the DRP takes out some of the stingWow is correct Mr @qldfrog.
This is HVST v STW (ETF tracking ASX200).
View attachment 168451
While it's each to their own, for the life I me I cannot understand why you'd put funds into HVST simply because it has an apparently attractive yield. There must be something about it I'm missing but I am more than OK in missing it.
and an annual fee of 0.72 per cent !!for the life I me I cannot understand why you'd put funds into HVST simply because it has an apparently attractive yield. There must be something about it I'm missing but I am more than OK in missing it.
that sounds OK when compared to a managed fund , but are they getting the runs on the board ( the share price suggests not )and an annual fee of 0.72 per cent !!
In house ETF will allow them to hide performances and give excusesthat sounds OK when compared to a managed fund , but are they getting the runs on the board ( the share price suggests not )
i am guessing they are losing capital in the rapid churning of portfolio holdings
will using in-house ETFs stop the capital destruction
I'd think there would be some "proprietary software" making allocations and trading in / out around dividend time, trying to scalp a bit of yield. And that would be a messy operation, especially as it is an open end ETF with money flowing in and out on a daily basis.In house ETF will allow them to hide performances and give excuses
I'd think there would be some "proprietary software" making allocations and trading in / out around dividend time, trying to scalp a bit of yield. And that would be a messy operation, especially as it is an open end ETF with money flowing in and out on a daily basis.
not a fan.
A riveting share price performance too according to the ASX charts.
While it's each to their own, for the life I me I cannot understand why you'd put funds into HVST
There must be something about it I'm missing but I am more than OK in missing it.
now i am guessing the A200 holding is the wholesale version which pays monthly , am not totally OK with that , but it was a real capital burner without the A200 holding as 'a core holding ' ( to help guarantee a monthly income to the ETF )Info on this product from the ASX web-site. Strange. Difficult not to look at this. It's akin to rubber necking at a car crash.
View attachment 168467
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?