SevenFX, the card including the cables was $US50 - it is a used card but if I get a couple of years out of it I will be happy. The card itself without cables is $US25, so I suppose if the card does stop working it is a cheap replacement. I bought it from a seller in the UK - I was expecting it next week sometime but it arrived today, I only ordered it on Thursday last week - 6 days from Edinburgh to Sydney.
Hi all, there are other solutions to these things also for instance the Matrox TripleHead2Go Digital Edition which are connected to a DVI (of a fairly decent graphics card) and allows spanning or cloning of monitor real estate (BUT) the monitors need the same resolution (and at present can only support 4:3 formats)... Or purchase nearly any graphics card nowadays with dualhead capability and run any mix of format and resolution... FWIW I run LHS 4:3 @ 1280x1024 x32bit & RHS 16:9 (primary monitor) @ 1680x1050 x16bit which is nothing special at all nowadays but the difference in use was really something when upgrading from a single 4:3 monitor!
Regards,
Dave
BTW Timmy, Google Matrox 200
Good find, as they are quality built and should last many years...
Worth noting if your using the drivers that comes with WindowsXP, they may be slow (clunky) So the right drivers will change that.
Here a link if anyone else wants the same card(sssssssss) and their are a few US/UK buyers to choose from...so be choosy... but bare in mind that they a older card and priced accordingly.
http://search.ebay.com/search/searc...ftrt=1&ftrv=1&saprclo=&saprchi=&fsop=1&fsoo=1
Cheers
SevenFX
Hi Guys
Im running three laptops and two LCD screens, Thats five screens, on two broadband connections. On the screens i run dynamic depth, dynamic ticker set a minimum of 25000 volume, Live announcements, commodity prices and one for scanning around.
Just quickly on the ram front, unless you're willing to go to Vista 64, there's not much point getting more than 2 gig of ram. Vista 32, xp etc are limited to 32bit of address space so your computer won't be able to see much more.
I'm running vista 64 at the moment and its a constant battle. Several of my older peripherals and several different apps that i'd use regularly simply don't work.
Processors- Dual core? Quad core? Is the extra cost of a quad core processor going to be worthwhile for running trading apps
RAM- was probably going to go for 2 gig of ram- my current rig only has 1, and copes(barely). Or should I get as much as I can??
graphics card- currently have one graphics card that runs 2 monitors. Would it be better to just get a second graphics card that will run another 2, or should I be looking for one card that will run 4 monitors.
Morning Professor.
Here's my take on Things.
Processor, I just recently went for a Higher clock speed core2 Duo processor (E6850 3.00Ghz) than the Quad Core (2.4Ghz) purely because the most (if not all) applications today (other than newest games) wont use the quad processor technology. and the E6850 @ 3.00Ghz will do a better job without
breaking out into a sweat. (While there are faster processors available in both varieties, Both of these are currently good value, while Intelsp fights off AMD ().
While I generally agree with DJ, my experience in running multiple monitors (& multiple cards), hence multiple apps under XP, has seen all all 2gb of memory exhausted where apps shut down, and a example where a 2gb ram is installed and swap file switch off, will highlight this issue (swap file is only used when real physical memory runs out.)
Some older or poorly written apps (incredible charts sorry colin) often doesn't release memory or copoperate with other apps or XP for that matter to manage memory pools well, hence another reason for more memory.
Lastly on Ram, of the 4gb of quality ram (Kingston) and which is DDR2 @1066mhz speed, I can say a large portion (1.4gb) is reservered for system resource tasks when you run multiple video cards & general misc motherboard system requirements
It would be cheaper to get a OLDER quad processor card and the Martrox at $50 is cheap, but you get what you pay for.. and if that one card fails you loose all monitors.
Cards also have come leaps n bounds, and today you can run dual or tripe DVI card each of them having 2 heads giving you (4 or 6 monitors) if your motherboard supports it. Preference is given to PCIE cards for best throughput & latest technology overall.
Also if you choose the Nvidia cards (called SLI)you can parallel them up to combine your video processor power which your motherboard must support.
There are great stands that support 6 monitors with flexijoints at $600 or you can build your own if your that way inclined.
Lastely your motherboard must support all the above and more, so choose wisely or can advise further. I use a higher end Gigabyte board.
Above is a short summary on such a long story, can flesh out more
Cheers
SevenFX
Cheers tekmann,
that's given me plenty to think about for the time being
Will be getting the local computer guy to do it for me, so he will be making sure all the parts will work together- I possibly could figure out how to do it myself, but would prefer to get it done by someone that really knows what they are doing- at least I know the job will be done well, and done quickly.
Have you got any links to somewhere that sells the monitor stands?
Suggestion, tell him what feature n functions you want first, see what you get for a cheaper quote and then see how much extra to for quality brand name stuff rated at higher speeds with quality components in mind. IMO
Also not sure what state your in and assuming you mean LCD as opposed to CRT tube monitors right...
Here some ideas, but I have another one in mind which will find.
http://www.esis.com.au/LCD-Monitors/MonitorArms.htm
Also consider maximun size of monitors are limitation on some of these stands...
SevenFX
XP can't cope with more than 3 GB ram. You *MAY* start to run into trouble if you try add more..
Running RAM on a dual channel motherboard is a good option. Not all motherboards around run in dual channel still...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?