I don't really understand the argument against bank profits. Their profits really aren't that large when you consider the size of their balance sheets and the scope of their operations. Likewise monthly account fees. You pay to use a service, just like anything else.
With interest rates, well, people will always complain when interest rates are increased by the banks, yet never congratulate the banks when they lower their rates. Can't have it both ways, people!
Given that taxpayers are ultimately taking the risk, it seems only fair that taxpayers also should be receiving the profits. That is free market capitalism - those who take the risk, receive the rewards.They have a monopoly over the industry thanks to government and are protected with taxpayer funds when it comes to the crunch. Plus nobody likes bankers
Well, I've only ever experienced good treatment from banks, no complaints.Plus nobody likes bankers
Let's remember that the banks have been paying the government a reasonable fee for the guarantee which was, after all, just a political measure to stop customers panicking and unnecessarily pulling funds out at the time of the GFC.Given that taxpayers are ultimately taking the risk, it seems only fair that taxpayers also should be receiving the profits. That is free market capitalism - those who take the risk, receive the rewards.
Well, I've only ever experienced good treatment from banks, no complaints.
Sometimes you do have to ask for what you want.
Thousands of people whine about account fees but could access fee-free a/c if they just asked.
Let's remember that the banks have been paying the government a reasonable fee for the guarantee which was, after all, just a political measure to stop customers panicking and unnecessarily pulling funds out at the time of the GFC.
We might have already received the profits. Imagine if the big 4 actually collapsed.Given that taxpayers are ultimately taking the risk, it seems only fair that taxpayers also should be receiving the profits. That is free market capitalism - those who take the risk, receive the rewards.
Do you own bank shares:
Na I'm ok with bankers, going to help build my bank managers palace / err I mean house. Being that I'm self employed I'm hoping after this I can borrow more than $50 without promising my first born and life story in hardcover.
Bank bashing is second only to Howard bashing as a favoured sport on ASF chat. .
They have a monopoly over the industry thanks to government and are protected with taxpayer funds when it comes to the crunch. Plus nobody likes bankers
Bank bashing is second only to Howard bashing as a favoured sport on ASF chat. Both have an idealogical basis.
Not at present, simply because I don't have much faith in the sector at the moment. Or in the entire market, for that matter.Do you own bank shares:
Fair comment, I'm sure. I've never been in the position of wanting to borrow for anything other than real estate mortgages.Na I'm ok with bankers, going to help build my bank managers palace / err I mean house. Being that I'm self employed I'm hoping after this I can borrow more than $50 without promising my first born and life story in hardcover.
It's something that puzzles me a bit, given the successful history of our banks being one of the main factors that allowed Australia to weather the storm of the GFC so well.Bank bashing is second only to Howard bashing as a favoured sport on ASF chat. Both have an idealogical basis.
Banks only profit what their clients are willing to pay them.
Australian banks were simply lucky. Thing would be very different if we had the same level of competition as in the US, and/or we did not have commodities boom supporting the Australian economy.It's something that puzzles me a bit, given the successful history of our banks being one of the main factors that allowed Australia to weather the storm of the GFC so well.
Australian banks were simply lucky. Thing would be very different if we had the same level of competition as in the US, and/or we did not have commodities boom supporting the Australian economy.
There are industries with far more entrecnched oligopolies and less competition than banking.They have a monopoly over the industry thanks to government and are protected with taxpayer funds when it comes to the crunch. Plus nobody likes bankers
No they didn't. The CBA maintained the warehousing facilities to securitised lenders during the GFC - the MBS/CDO market (predominately offshore) collapsed so that the warehoused debt couldn't be shifted to market.They also did it on the backs of the mortgage brokers by holding back on funds available to them and forcing them out of business.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?