- Joined
- 27 February 2008
- Posts
- 4,670
- Reactions
- 10
Hah!! New Jersey suburbs is NOT New York City!!! It's in a different STATE!!!! No-one in NYC wants to live in New Jersey......
You either are having us on big time and/or you have never been to NYC!
Cheers,
Beej
dear beej and kincella
can you please point me to ANY australian city /town / boondock where one is able to purchase this quality house for the same price
last time i looked even in an outer mortgage belt area like even werribee one would be looking in the high 700,s /800/s(probably more ) for this size pad
but hey ........ never let the facts stand in the way of a good story
It's 50 squares and about 45 minutes drive to Houston CBD according to google maps
lol . oh we talking about negotiatians now .ok that one for 499 i,d prolly get for 400 or maybe less seeing as times are hard in the US .... lol
Not likely: "Offers Over $580,000"asking price $580k, could probably get for $550k.
Not too bad actually, if you could get it for 550.OK so that house was $499k US?? = $600k AU. Too easy - how about this one (attached, from http://www.domain.com.au/Public/PropertyDetails.aspx?adid=2007930624). It;s got 4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, DLUG. Cranebrook (western SYDNEY - not some second rate town in the boonies either, 45 mins on freeway to CBD), asking price $580k, could probably get for $550k. Took me 2 mins to find this - there are dozens more...... You have no idea about the market here.
Cheers,
Beej
Not likely: "Offers Over $580,000"
Whenever I've enquired on properties advertised as such, they wont even take what is advertised..........when they say over they normally mean it.........at least until they get desperate
cheers
Hah!! New Jersey suburbs is NOT New York City!!! It's in a different STATE!!!! No-one in NYC wants to live in New Jersey......
You either are having us on big time and/or you have never been to NYC!
Cheers,
Beej
Kind of smashes the whole relative affordability BS doesn't it when you compare like with like?
Beej,
You'd better have another look at the border between NYC and Joisey. Most of NYC suburbs are in New Jersey. "West New York City" is in New Jersey State.
Take a look at Washington DC, it has suburbs in Virginia and Maryland. There are several US cities with suburbs in the next state!
Now tell me again about Jersey?
I'm not saying it's not near NYC, I'm just stating the following facts:
1) the 5 boroughs that comprise NYC do NOT include any in New Jersey state - NYC is in New York state only.
2) No-one who lives in NYC considers NJ suburbs a part of the city - they would go way out into Brooklyn or Queens first! Most New Yorkers don't even consider anything off Manhattan to be NYC. Hence you cannot use NJ suburbs as realistic examples of NYC real estate prices! It's like using Woolongong to say Sydney houses are cheap!
Cheers,
Beej
Nonsense.
Wollongong is much further from Sydney than Jersey.
Perhaps he/she was, however reverse equity loans are for PPOR only and the majority of retiress currently are not self-funding and own only their own home (at least, this was the scenario 12 months ago). It will become a growing phenomenon.Mofra I think Gfresh is reffering to their rental properties. Once the boomers retire and their marginal tax rate goes to 15% they will no longer have the tax need to be property speculators. Hence they will sell. It is the investment properties that are leveraged not the PPRs
Gav...the govt would have to spend a similar amount itself in building public housing....and the govt knows the private sector is more efficient in providing this service, than any govt programs....just think of it this way...in the past the govt spent millions providing public housing....still using our taxpayers money...then they found a more efficient way...let the public spend the mopney and give them a tax deduction....
you should know Keating stopped neg gearing back in the 70's...but reinstated it very quickly when investors fled....and then the subsequent shortage of housing for renters suddenly dried up....the govt had not thought to replace the housing stock with its own stock....
the immigrants are a ready market for most of the public housing that is still out there today...believe almost no new public housing built since the 1970's...
so to answer your question...if I were not allowed to claim deductions...I would have to rethink my investments.....but the same non allowance would be applied to any investment, including shares.......
and a question for you...what if they turned it around and home owners were allowed to claim a tax deduction for the interest expense...like they do in the US ??? would that change your mind about owning a home....there were rumours of this approach....
in that case..maybe more people would become home owners rather than renters.....its doubtful that would turn people around....we have moved down from the 70% owners ratio of the past, and moving into the lower 60% and heading for a 50% mix
anyway, I would find a way to keep my properties as the bulk of my investments...or I might move further into commercial properties...which are the best of the best anyway
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?