- Joined
- 6 September 2008
- Posts
- 7,676
- Reactions
- 68
Here's some food for thought.
Australia's population is growing at 1.7% a year (Source: ABS).
At this rate of growth it will take approximately 45 years for our population to double. All those extra people will have to live some where.
So what's it to be?
a) All these extra people will buy houses pushing prices back up again.
b) All these people will be so far priced out of the market it will create boom times for property investors.
c) A little bit of a) and a little bit of b).
All you property bears must concede one point though. At some time houses will turn and start to increase in value again, otherwise all your arguments support a goal of free housing for everyone or zero growth. Neither of which can happen (zero growth short term but not sustainable long term).
only 1%, I agree it's more like 15% so far.I agree, I dont need some arrogant full of himself ******** telling me house prices have fallen either
only 1%, I agree it's more like 15% so far.
Not according to those links or latest valuations for my areas
https://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=377989&postcount=2682
Maybe in your areas, but I'm not invested there so it's not an issue for me.
You see, looking at the wobbly green line its plain to see that different areas have different cycles, mines on the up, yours is not but was possibly on the up while mine were down.
Cycles eh
Yeah cycles, boom and bust always in Australia, it will cover the whole property scene though, next year, starting Friday.
Struth Robots.
Looks like that info you gave me on St Kilda could be a bit shonky.
In fact Tech's chart says it crashed in 08
It is kind of funny how all of us share investors can handle the fact that the sharemarket goes up, then it comes down.
Why are there so many headstrong property bulls on this sight who don't seem to be able to say the words?
1/ They havent seen this before and cant get their head around it yet.
2/ Debt - they are highly leveraged and cant admit that it may be a problem going forward.
3/ see #1 again - they just dont believe their precious property can actually go backwards.
So in conclusion a regular secure income from real estate (even if prices don't go up for a while) sounds a lot better than a 50% drop in shares with dropping dividends. For the first time in 8 years I have started thinking about property again, some buyers have disappeared and I like the secure income. Just my thoughts from personal experiences, good luck to you all.
1/ They havent seen this before and cant get their head around it yet.
2/ Debt - they are highly leveraged and cant admit that it may be a problem going forward.
3/ see #1 again - they just dont believe their precious property can actually go backwards.
In Sydney where I live (near the beaches) we have a severe shortage of rental properties. No matter what the economy brings to our door steps we can always rent these properties for good money. A 300K property can rent for around $325 per week. There are no shortage of takers, when there is a open for rental inspection there are dozens of people wanting to rent these places. Recession or no recession they in high demand.
Sales, the lower price range between 300K and 400K they still sell very quickly, the only noticeable difference around right now is that there are less buyers around but that doesn't mean there isn't fierce competition. Most of these properties are snavelled up in 2 to 4 weeks.
Property in my area has never ever taken a 50% fall over the cliff type of dive like the sharemarket has, that is still something I have to get use to. Further more 2 of my stocks have stopped paying dividends and others have reduced dividends. This doesn't happen with renting an investment property, not to me in my area.
Personally, I believe this level of property ownership, and the financial security and freedom it provides, is attainable to many people here if only they would open their eyes to the possibilities and think long term. I'm not saying don't invest in shares either (I have significant share holdings as well), but I think you are MAD not to see the benefit in acquiring and paying off your PPOR as early as you possibly can in life. Just owning my current house delivers me an effective before tax return of over 9% on my invested capital, guaranteed and GROWING, year in year out, just from the rent I don't have to pay to provide a well located (and admittedly pretty nice) home for my family to live in.
The bulls make fine arguments, but if accurate, will leave Australia with the most expensive property market on the planet in a couple of years.
Is it worth it?
Whil i can see what you are saying, how do you propose that young people such as myself (21yo) acquire a house early, when the wages of 'standard' jobs (teacher, nurses, clerks etc) are not enough to cover the 'average' mortage?
Surely it is better renting and investing/saving the difference, until they/I reach a point at which i have a large enough deposit to be able to start paying off principal in large amounts, rather than just paying off interest.
The place we currently rent, has a prime location, yet the rent we pay is only about 90% of what the mortage would be if it was a 100% loan (was only about 50% when rates were higher), and thats not taking into account bodycorp fees and maintenance, rates etc
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?