Australian (ASX) Stock Market Forum

Hicks release at end of month

Joined
30 January 2007
Posts
729
Reactions
1
Hicks plans simple new life
By Garry Linnell
December 01, 2007 06:00am


DAVID Hicks has begun plotting his escape from prison – but that will be the easy part. Once free, the one-time Australian terror supporter may face several months on the run.

On December 29, Australia's most controversial prisoner is due to be escorted from his cell in the maximum-security G Division of South Australia's Yatala prison and led to the front gates.

Waiting beyond them will be a new kind of hell for the 32-year-old former soldier of jihad.
David, please meet your new Goliath; a voracious battalion of media stormtroopers.

Hicks, one of few Australians to have met Osama bin Laden, who trained in al-Qaeda-linked camps and was captured in Afghanistan serving with the Taliban forces, is clinging to the hope that he can remain anonymous and return to a simple, unaffected life in Adelaide.

Like so many of the plans he has made, this one is laced with naivety and almost doomed from the start. Outside those gates will be one of the largest media packs assembled in this country.

Hicks was captured by the Northern Alliance in December 2001 and handed over to the US military for a fee of $1000. But the price on his head will be considerably higher this time around.

Few have seen him since the late 1990s and his features are said to have changed considerably from the several aged and out-of-focus photos now in existence.

Hicks wants to keep it that way.

He has received plenty of advice that his best tactic in handling the approaching storm is to make a statement or have one read on his behalf, let himself be photographed and sate the media's appetite, before departing into obscurity. But Hicks has always had a stubborn streak that, despite many of the changes he has undergone in recent years, remains in force.

And so he, his father, Terry, and lawyer, David McLeod, have begun planning his exit from Yatala.

"He's nervous and anxious," McLeod says. "Nobody knows what he looks like and he wants to be released with a minimum of fuss."

Says Terry of the coming showdown: "They'll want their piece of flesh. But at this stage David doesn't want to make any appearances. He just wants to come home and live a normal life."

No one is willing to talk about the details of just how such a plan can be pulled off. But both the South Australian and Federal police have offered assistance.

"It's a fluid plan and it will have to be flexible," McLeod says.

Sources told The Daily Telegraph this week that Hicks may be secretly transferred in the days leading up to his scheduled release to another prison - possibly to Mobilong, an hour from Adelaide, or the more secluded Port Augusta jail, four hours from Yatala.

Under the deal that saw Hicks return to Australia this year to complete his sentence, he agreed to a gag order preventing him from speaking about his experiences until the end of next March.

While it is likely he will consent to a TV interview after that date (the favoured option is the Nine Network's Ray Martin, a critic of the Australian government's handling of the case), it potentially means Hicks, if he wishes to remain anonymous until then, faces months of pursuit by paparazzi.

But getting Hicks out of prison and hidden from public view is one thing. The bigger task facing Team Hicks will likely be in the months and years to come. So how does a man with such notoriety, whose case divided his country and its politicians, who has been incarcerated for six years (much of it in solitary confinement) and who, by so many accounts, has a naive and uncomplicated view of the world, blend back into a normal life?

"He's going to need time - a lot of time - to assimilate into a normal type of life," McLeod says. "He's been totally institutionalised for almost six years and while Yatala's been the Hilton hotel compared to Guantanamo, he will find it difficult to settle back into a normal life."

There are 26 cells inside Yatala's G Division, a home for the depraved, the notorious, the mad and the overwhelmingly bad. For Hicks, this life is as close to normal as he has experienced in almost a decade.

Each prisoner is secluded and woken about 7am. Breakfast is usually toast and spreads, lunch an array of sandwiches and dinner, normally served late in the afternoon, can range from roasts and casseroles to fish and chips.

A solitary stroll in the exercise yard is supervised by three guards. But that is the only company that David Hicks enjoys. Prisoners never mix with one another.

Inside his self-contained cell, where even the shower nozzles are hidden inside the wall to minimise all potential hanging points, Hicks has been watching TV, reading and studying. Having forsaken Islam during his early years at Guantanamo, he would now like to obtain a degree in either ecology or zoology at Adelaide University.

In his cell is a university entrance examination paper but in recent weeks he has put it aside. The deadline for admissions passed last month and he will not be eligible to enrol until 2009. First he must prove he has reached the required academic standards; still a sizeable task for someone expelled from school at the age of 14, even if he spent much of his time cramming while in Guantanamo.

Hicks has received counselling to assist in coping with his experiences over the past six years - he alleged he was badly mistreated by US guards - but his father believes life in the outside world will pose just as many stressful challenges.

Terry says: "Once he's out of the system it's going to be a shock to him. When he was in Guantanamo he had so much time on his hands. He has less in Yatala and already he's finding it difficult to deal with.

"Having to follow more of a set routine is going to place a lot of pressure on him and I suppose employers will need to be lenient (in regards to) that and understand what he's been through."

According to Terry, several prospective employers have already contacted him indicating they would be willing to give David work following his release from jail.

He won't say what type of jobs they are, but reveals the offers come from supporters of Hicks' argument that he was wrongly captured, wrongly imprisoned and wrongly convicted.

"There's been a few offers," Terry says. "David could do anything. "He's not afraid of anything . . . regardless of how dirty it is."

In a letter to Prime Minister John Howard in early 2005 pleading his case to return to Australia, Hicks wrote: "I like to think of myself as a true-blue Aussie. Australia is in my heart and forever will be.

"I have walked her sandy beaches and rugged coastlines. Been a jackeroo in the northern bush and shorn sheep in the south.

"Its memories and character live on inside me."

But one thing Terry says his son will not be doing following his release is requesting a new passport and heading back overseas. He pauses for a moment when asked about this. With just a trace of irony in his gravelly voice, Terry adds: "I think David has done enough travelling."
 
Continued....



Like that of many fathers and sons, the relationship between Terry and David has been complicated. The early days when David left school and began getting into trouble, before he headed into the bush to become, among many things, a kangaroo skinner, were fraught with arguments and disagreements. But now his son is back on Australian soil, Terry says they have grown much closer.

On most Sunday mornings Terry drives the 25 minutes from his home in the Adelaide suburb of Salisbury Park to the prison in Northfield to spend 30 minutes with David.

"It's a very quick 30 minutes, let me tell you," he says.

David is normally dressed in jeans and a sweatshirt (G Division prisoners often wear black to differentiate them from prisoners in other sections of Yatala) and their meetings always end with Terry telling David he loves him and David telling Terry the same thing.

"It's a lot stronger (the relationship)," says Terry. "He's definitely changed. He's a different fella . . . very different. He's matured so much. Look, we've always had our ups and downs and who doesn't? But it's been an incredibly emotional time for him."

A fortnight ago Hicks was visited by the two children he had with former partner, Jodie Sparrow. "That's always emotional for everyone," adds Terry.

Meanwhile, if a book is to be written, says Terry, he will co-write it with his son. The tale will span David's early years, his time with Islam and his support of al-Qaeda's motives in the war on terror, his years in prison and his claims that he was regularly beaten during interrogations and at one stage offered the services of a prostitute for 15 minutes if he would spy on other detainees in Guantanamo - an offer he says he rejected.

A Boy's Own Adventure? In one of his first letters home, penned from Pakistan, Hicks' immaturity was evident as he gushed about his latest exploit: "Peshawar is three hours from the Afghanistan border - it's a lot bigger than Adelaide. Pakistan produces all the fruit and vegies I've seen in Adelaide plus so many more. I have seen so many things and places. I've learned so much. My best adventure yet. Action packed."

It's not the son that Terry says he now sees each week and, while he admits David will face difficulties he has not even foreseen, there is an edge of pride in his voice that a wild son has begun to settle down.

But no matter how well-conceived and executed the plan is for David Hicks' life on the outside, much is likely to depend on whether the Australian Federal Police secure a control order against him.

The order would require Hicks to report regularly to police, but such a requirement needs approval from the incoming federal attorney-general, Robert McClelland.

Hicks' supporters had been hoping that Bob Debus, the former NSW attorney-general, would be appointed. Debus took a strong interest in the Hicks case and spoke openly against the Howard government's handling of the case, its refusal to question America's handling of Hicks' incarceration and its delay in striking the deal to return him to Australia.

But McClelland may also be sympathetic. He said earlier this year that the trial and process faced by Hicks during his military commission trial had been "shortsighted" and unfair. But prime minister-elect Kevin Rudd is not regarded as a strong Hicks supporter.

McLeod believes Hicks' case needs to be put in perspective. He says: "He's not in prison for having murdered someone or raped someone. He's been found guilty of association with something that has happened a long way from South Australia . . . he's been in (Yatala) more for thought crime than anything else.

"Why would you put someone on a control order for activities that were not in breach of Australian law, even if they were true at the time?

"He's been a model prisoner. He's studied inside. He hasn't gotten into trouble or wanted to cause any trouble. If he wanted to challenge his whole experience he could. But David wants to go forward in his life. He wants to be Joe Citizen."
 
There will be some who say he should be punished for the rest of his life.

I think he is a young man who has well and truly served his time - a symbol of everything that is wrong with the so-called 'war on terror', and the erosion of our way of life in Australia.


What does everyone think?
 
I think, we should not forget where it was that he was found(hint-not the hilton on a french beach resorting catching a tan). I think, we should not forget what he had in his hand (hint, it fires bullets)when he was caught. I think, we should not forget that he abandoned two young children who needed a father and leader. I think, in years to come, many people will sit in awe at how the media, press, and his father managed to turn him into a hero. I think, he was probably more a bumbling idiot then anything else. I think, if at the time he was caught, he could of pulled the trigger against our troops, he would of. I think, he did some hard time in Cuba. I think, people deserve a second change. I think, he should be given his 2nd chance, but a very guarded closely watched 2nd chance.


I think he is a young man who has well and truly served his time

What does everyone think?
 
Fair call Gordon.

Im not trying to minimise the impact of what he did... just trying to make a point about the exceptional and tragic consequences of his actions.

Brad
 
To think the guy had a fair trial and therefore proven guilty is lunacy. He certainly did admit guilt. Who wouldn't have pleaded guilty after having to endure 5 years or so in camp xray with no idea of when he would even be charged with an offense..

It wouldn't be too hard to plead guilty when the options are either to be extradited to Australia and serve out a relatively short sentence in a civil prison or rot in camp x ray for potentially the rest of his life....I'm glad I never had to rely on Alexander Downer to get me out of trouble in another country.


Whether he is guilty of playing for the other team or not will never really be known. He is no more guilty than western soldiers from an Afghani civilian's point of view even if he did what the US forced him to admit to.


cheers,
 
There will be some who say he should be punished for the rest of his life.

I think he is a young man who has well and truly served his time - a symbol of everything that is wrong with the so-called 'war on terror', and the erosion of our way of life in Australia.


What does everyone think?

Rather the opposite, the war on terror (Afghanistan, not Iraq) aims to protect our way of life, by stopping people who are fundamentaly opposed to the way in which we (the western world) live our lives and are hellbent on destroying the way in which we live.
 
Rather the opposite, the war on terror (Afghanistan, not Iraq) aims to protect our way of life, by stopping people who are fundamentaly opposed to the way in which we (the western world) live our lives and are hellbent on destroying the way in which we live.

Dont you think the war on terror fuels the hate of those hellbent on destroying our lives? What came first? the chicken or the egg?
 
A few articles around the subject..

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/24/2068873.htm
US prosecutor pressured over Hicks bargain
Posted Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:23pm AEST
Updated Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:20pm AEST
The US military lawyer who led the case against David Hicks says he was under political pressure to secure the convicted terrorist supporter's release from Guantanamo Bay.

Colonel Moe Davis says his concern led to his resignation as chief prosecutor of the US Military Commission.

A report in US publication Harper's Magazine quotes an unnamed military source saying that that US Vice President Dick Cheney and Prime Minister John Howard negotiated a plea bargain.

Mr Howard has rejected suggestions that he influenced the outcome.

Colonel Davis says he does not know the extent of political influence but feels it was reflected in Hicks' sentence, which will see him released from prison at the end of the year.

"I think it's pretty clear that in our discussions with the defence about the possibility of a plea bargain, we never discussed anything close to the deal that David Hicks got," he said.

Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer says the Federal Government asked the United States to speed up prosecuting David Hicks, but did not interfere in the judicial process.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/10/2055812.htm
Crispin critical of Govt in farwell speech
Posted Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:50pm AEST

ACT Supreme Court Justice Ken Crispin has used his retirement speech to criticise the Federal Government's handling of terrorism-related matters.

Tributes have flown at a ceremonial sitting for Justice Crispin today with many commending his strong track record for law reform and social justice.

Justice Crispin was critical of the detention of Australian David Hicks in Guantanamo Bay for five years.

"The Nazi war criminals arrested at the end of World War Two were given fair trials in open courts with the press present," he said.

"Does anybody really imagine David Hicks was a more dangerous man than Rudolph Hess and the other Nazi criminals trialled at that time?"


Justice Crispin ,,,, was the ACT's first director of public prosecutions and is known for representing the Chamberlain family in a Royal Commission and the Wik people in their first native title decision.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/12/2058338.htm
Hicks' lawyer receives award for hard work
Posted Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:21pm AEST
Updated Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:07pm AEST

United States military lawyer Major Michael Mori says he is honoured and humbled to a receive an award recognising his work in defending convicted terrorism supporter David Hicks.

Major Mori was presented with a civil justice award by the Australian Lawyers Alliance at their national conference in Hobart today.

The award recognises Major Mori's dedication and commitment to defending his client, despite considerable risk to his own career.


Major Mori says he does not think his efforts were anything out of the ordinary.

"Honestly I think I didn't do anything special that any other military lawyer that had been assigned to David would have done," he said.

"I think it's what military lawyers are doing in the United States everyday... I just think this one got a little bit more attention."

...... He says he keeps in touch with Hicks's family and wishes him well for his release at the end of the year.

"I hope to see David in the future. I want the best for David and I hope a year from now he's moved on with his life, doing university and achieved the goals he's set for himself to get back on with his life," he said.

"He's got a family that's supporting him."
 
According to former CIA Chief, Michael Scheuer, it's quite simple why we are at odds.

"Michael believes politicians are getting the wrong advice on what motivates Al-Qaeda and its Allies. He says they're not motivated by a hatred of "freedom and liberty and women in the workplace and draught beer after work. They couldn't get any support in the Muslim world for that kind of thing".

Rather, he says, "they hate us because of what we do in the Islamic world. We have a military and civilian presence on the Arabian Peninsular. We give unqualified support to Israel. For 50 years we have supported every form of Arab tyranny and despot because we needed oil from the region. Those are the motivations of Al-Qaeda ..and it's a hatred that is shared by the vast majority of Muslims".


Listen to the whole interview with Richard Fidler here: http://www.abc.net.au/queensland/conversations/stories/s1977045.htm



cheers,
 
Dont you think the war on terror fuels the hate of those hellbent on destroying our lives? What came first? the chicken or the egg?

So we stand idly by and let them murder people? They tried it in 1993, with the 1st Bombing of the WTC's, and again in 1994, with the bombing of the Phillipines Airlines Flight, in 1998 they (Al-Qaeda) bombed U.S embassies in Africa, and in 2000, Islamic terrorists bombed several locations in Manila, and of course the September 11 Attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people. Finally, the western world has taken the fight to these people, maybe the war on terror does fuel the hate of these Islamic fundamentalists, but honestly, how many more attacks were the World supposed to take before action was taken?
 
So we stand idly by and let them murder people? They tried it in 1993, with the 1st Bombing of the WTC's, and again in 1994, with the bombing of the Phillipines Airlines Flight, in 1998 they (Al-Qaeda) bombed U.S embassies in Africa, and in 2000, Islamic terrorists bombed several locations in Manila, and of course the September 11 Attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people. Finally, the western world has taken the fight to these people, maybe the war on terror does fuel the hate of these Islamic fundamentalists, but honestly, how many more attacks were the World supposed to take before action was taken?

How much more manipulation by the US in muslim countries will we accept until we realise if we just left them alone, we wouldn't have this trouble..

We don't want to lose our freedoms just like joe average in a muslim country doesn't want to be overrun by westerners where we degrade their religious beliefs..

Why not just back out of Israel, Iraq, and the arab world, stop all trade and outlaw any international travel to or from those countries... Let them live their lives in their holy lands and we live ours.

Oh that's right... They have what we want, not vice versa..


cheers,
 
Rather the opposite, the war on terror (Afghanistan, not Iraq) aims to protect our way of life, by stopping people who are fundamentaly opposed to the way in which we (the western world) live our lives and are hellbent on destroying the way in which we live.

Well in defending us our governments have done a poor job. You dont fight fire with fire. On these fundamentals I could go for hours.

Hicks like a lot of young fellows began as a bit of a rebel, got in with the wrong lot and the rest is history. In his own mind he was apposed to the military standover might of the west. And by jove we have a lot to answer for as the truth is revealed in the months of a new government less bent on media restrictions.

No one is going to agree on all the issues here. Hicks has paid dearly and we should all move on and let him put his life and family back together.
 
I have probably come over too strong, and I apologise if I have offended anybody. While I tend to agree with the war on terrorism, I can understand the different points of view. I for one disagree with Guantanamo. The beauty of demorcracy and free speech I guess. Have a nice night everyone, after all, we should appreciate the lifestyle we live as compared to some people throughout the world.
 
cool, no need to apologize...Your view is important and no more or less than anyone else. Have a good one.


According to the ex CIA chief, your view that the muslim world wants to change our life is a misinformed one... They just want to be left alone. He believes until the general population starts to understand what bin laden is saying, there will always be serious conflict. Spend 20 minutes and listen to the link I posted earlier, if for nothing more than to bag me later LOL...


cheers,
 
So we stand idly by and let them murder people? They tried it in 1993, with the 1st Bombing of the WTC's, and again in 1994, with the bombing of the Phillipines Airlines Flight, in 1998 they (Al-Qaeda) bombed U.S embassies in Africa, and in 2000, Islamic terrorists bombed several locations in Manila, and of course the September 11 Attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people. Finally, the western world has taken the fight to these people, maybe the war on terror does fuel the hate of these Islamic fundamentalists, but honestly, how many more attacks were the World supposed to take before action was taken?

As Chomsky says, "Do we ask Washington DC to be bombed for the thousands of innocent deaths the US has caused around the world? Of course we don't. The proposition is ridiculous. So why do we think it ok when it comes to other countries?"
 
Top