tech/a said:
Property investors gear themselves so that interest rates have little bearing on their overall stratergy.
Agreed with your comments tech/a where it comes to property
investors.
But what about the large number of amateur property
speculators who haven't even thought about a proper strategy in the first place?
The difference between the two is stark. One is professional with a long term plan. A bit like trading stocks with a strategy proven to work. The other is amateur and in it purely for capital gains. A bit like buying hot technology or mining stocks because they have
already risen by a large amount.
Spot the difference? It is as clear as black and white.
Normally this wouldn't matter too much since owner occupiers and professional landlords greatly outnumber speculators. But it is no secret that the recent boom has been substantially driven by amateur speculators following the advice of reality TV shows and touring "investment" gurus promising near-instant riches simply by buying virtually any property. Remember that ANYONE can be a millionaire within months or at most a couple of years with no starting capital and practically no work required according to these "experts".
There is a huge difference between professionals and amateurs when it comes to risk management. No amateur will belive anyone advocating position sizing and limiting losses to 2% when trading stocks. No, you need to take big risks on junior mining or technology stocks because that's how amateurs think money is made in the stock market.
Let's face it, not many of us on this forum made our first trades with a stop loss limited to 2% of trading capital and a strategy back tested and proven to work. Some might, but not the vast majority who rushed in to some hot stock, made a profit, thought they knew the lot and then promptly blew the lot. Sound familiar?
Risk management, positive expectancy and exit strategies are for those who just don't get it that this latest bunch of amateurs has it all worked out when it comes to the market and every trade they make is a
guaranteed winner. Risking the lot is perfectly safe when you're 100% accurate at predicting the market. Or so they think until it all comes spectacularly crashing down because amateurs don't have a clue about risk management.
Or we could look outside the financial markets to something physical. Consider how a qualified tradesman electrician wires a house compared to a typical handyman. In both cases the lights will work and there is power. But that nice fancy looking switchboard the tradesman insisted on is so your house doesn't burn down
when something goes wrong. The average handyman doesn't have a clue that the physical environment surrounding a cable, as well as the cable itself, determines the rating of the circuit breakers needed to safely protect that cable. Indeed the average handyman hasn't got a clue what I'm on about... And if you ask them about power factor then be prepared for an awfully blank look. And the end result is that whilst both will work, the handyman is
guessing that the risk of fire or shock has been adequately dealt with whereas the tradesman has properly
calculated the required equipment ratings as the law requires them to do. The professional has managed the risk to a minimal level (since nothing electrical can ever be totally safe by its very nature) wheras the handyman said "she'll be right" which it will, until that day when something goes wrong and then you're in big trouble.
Now, does anyone seriously believe that all these newbie landlords with 4 properties all on close to 100% mortgages have done any proper risk management calculations? Half of them probably don't realise that a 5% fall in the price, which has already happened in Sydney, would completely wipe out their equity given the huge leverage they are typically using.
We are not dealing with professionals here but with amateurs with $ signs in their eyes. Amateurs who are already shocked to find that interest rates actually can be adjusted upwards. Amateurs who are shocked to find that property prices haven't risen by at least 10% this year so far since that 20% per annum is a guaranteed profit, right? Amateurs that never thought about what happens if the property is vacant or something expensive breaks. Or, more to the point, amateurs who never even thought they needed tenants in the first place and are purely counting on the capital gains to pay the mortgage, rates etc. when they sell.
Are these people properly prepared for tough times? Have they even considered that interest rate variations, price slumps, governments changing, recessions, destructive tenants and urgent repairs are perfectly normal occurrences which can be expected? I expect that tech/a
has thought of these things and is running a proper landlord's business accordingly. But does the average mum and dad speculation empire have such knowledge of the markets? I very much doubt it.