The scary thing is this, if he doesnt get his way he just turns all "communist" then throws a bit of "shadow cash" the states way to make the general public believe that if the reforms dont go ahead its not his fault.
More spin than win thats for sure, lets hope the public dont fall for this crap yet again and elect this government again, does anyone really trust the federal government to manage our hospitals when they cant even manage insulation?
Almost all the usual suspects having a Labor bash again, GG will be along shortlyanyway lets have a look at how the 2010 election betting is going as of last Friday....Oh dear its the usual bad news for the Right wing of the ASF.
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/04/09/betting-market-friday-9/
~
Almost all the usual suspects having a Labor bash again, GG will be along shortlyanyway lets have a look at how the 2010 election betting is going as of last Friday....Oh dear its the usual bad news for the Right wing of the ASF.
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollytics/2010/04/09/betting-market-friday-9/
~
WTF has this got to do with the tread which is about health.
If you don't have anything constructive to add to the debate Cynical, I suggest you stay away from this thread full stop.
it would appear very evident that Kevin Rudd's proposal has no real substance or plan[/B] to really improve our ailing health system and in fact it has been dubbed a failure by many experts in the field of health. There is little doubt, Rudd's proposal has a political agenda to aid his bid to retain office. A political agenda to make him look like he is doing something to reform health. A major diversion away from the Labor Party failures over the past 2.5 years.
Rudd has used bullying tactics on the states and threatens a referendum if he does not get his own way. Different spokespersons have stated he already has the constitutional power to take over the health system. He threatened to do just that prior to the 2007 election if the states did not improve their hospital system by July 2009. So why did he renege? I'll tell you why, because he feared another debacle like every thing else he has touched. He now has the option of blaming the states if things go wrong.
The concern of many Australians is, if Rudd does call a referendum, how will he word it as I posted on another thread a few days ago?
It will be tricky, make no mistake.
How a busy Prime Minister keeps abreast with the news of the day
The Nine Network's Today show, October 3, 2007:
JOURNALIST: Labor staffers make sure he is across the day's issues even before he gets to a newspaper.
Kevin Rudd: They're out of bed at 4.30 in the morning. So when I wake up, it's a telephone call to say, `What's happening in the world, guys?'
The Prime Minister on ABC North Coast yesterday:
YVETTE Steinhauer: Mr Rudd, the architect of Medicare, John Deeble, who your party often cites as a health expert, has come out this morning and has not been very flattering about your health agenda.
Rudd: Well, perhaps. I haven't seen those comments from John.
The Prime Minister on ABC Wide Bay on Monday:
JOURNALIST: Roger Corbett has labelled your health reforms bizarre and also a formula for disaster. How to do you respond to those criticisms?
Rudd: I haven't seen those comments.
If the Rudd government proposes to raise the GST then it will have lost the plot politically as well as economically.Whilst it is common knowledge that Rudd and the Labor Party were not happy about the introduction of the GST and the fact that they were going to roll it back when they got into power, would it not solve all their health problems if they raised the GST to 12.5%? At least everyone would know they would be contributing 2.5 cents in the dollar on everything that was purchased.
To raise money from an ETS, which would be passed on to consumer goods, one would not know how much goods would be costing extra and would it not be open to rorting by unscrupulous manufacturers?
But whether Rudd has the fortitude to raise the GST is another question. It was raised by the states before the 2007 election, but Rudd did not want a bar of it, probably fearing a back lash from voters.
The Labor Party keeps talking about fairness to working families, so it would probably be fairer to raise the GST where it is all out in the open. No more hidden costs like we had with the sales taxes and I recall sales tax was often raised when Governments needed money and no one was any the wiser.
WTF has this thread got to do with health reform...you started it as a political, Labor bashing exercise so you and the ASF right could do the usual, whiny, end of the world, Rudd bashing demolition job on all things Labor.
Hey how did I miss this thread, nothing like a good labor bash(luckily you pointed it out). Let’s face it labor = fail on so many levels. You don't need that many facts and figures, as all of their policies seem to turn to brown. I'm beginning to wonder if they could organize flies on $hit.
But alas, I unfortunately agree with cynlibs will lose next election unless Rudd bumbles early.
As far as the health reform goes, it sure does have the stink of the ETS rush job on it. Why are all of Rudds polices pressured rush jobs with no detail for anyone to analysis, but must be done right absolutely now?
Election time all my policies failed blues
what I can't understand is his rush to push this through before the budget without the finer details for all to understand. Does he have a hidden agenda to set up Health Reform before the Henry Tax review, is it to make him look like he is doing something which he knows is a major concern on everyone's minds or is it just another diversion from all his failings? He knows how to push the right buttons and the naive fall for it every time.
As Julia says, The Architect of Medicare, John Deeble has not been very flattering of Rudd's health agenda. Rodger Corbett has labelled Rudd's health reform as bizarre and a formula for disaster.
In addition to these medical academics, Ken Baxter is suggesting an increase in the GST to 12.5% would solve the problem for the states to seek more money for health reform, but Rudd says over my 'dead' body. He would sooner raise monies by other devious means which one can be assured will hurt the Mum's and Dad's and the working families, you know the one's he is so passionate about, more than the GST. Let's face it, health care is now costing a lot more than it did 20 or 30 years ago and with the increase in life expectancy with modern medical care, we are all living a lot longer and the money has to come from somewhere. Who knows with modern medical research and stem cell developement, humans could be living to the age fo 120 years and beyond by 2050. What impact will that have on the population growth and the capacity to take care of them? I have not heard one comment from any of our so called political experts from either side. Is it a possibility? It is not only a possibilty but inevitable! At least some of the journos are tyring to work out what the question wil be put to the public if we have a referendum.
Yes, we need health reform, but it has to be implimented correctly with a lot of thought and common sense, but the way Rudd is going about it may prove to be of no benefit to anyone.
So Cynical, usually we see what we want to see.
So you view Noco's intial post as propaganda against the government.
I viewed it as a fairly reasonable summary of the situation on the proposed health 'reforms' to date.
I have put 'reforms' in quotes because I can't for the life of me see how Mr Rudd's suggested moving around of the dollars is going to in any way at all benefit patient care, or remove any of the stress on healthcare staff.
Obviously you as an ardent fan of the Prime Minister will have clearly understood what I'm missing here, i.e. how Mr Rudd's suggested changes (I can't bear to say 'reforms') will improve our health system. You will be able to counter the warnings from Professor Dwyer et al, very experienced medical professionals, who say Mr Rudd's suggestions are nothing short of disastrous and absolutely should not be pursued.
Isn't it reasonable to assume that the people at the coalface of Health will actually appreciate what would be useful and what would not?
So I look forward to your explanation of exactly how the proposed Rudd changes will bring benefits to all of us who participate in the health system, whether as patients or healthcare professionals.
You'll need to give a justification, amongst your explanation, of a whole new level of bureaucracy to administer this new system.
Almost all the usual suspects having a Labor bash again, GG will be along shortlyanyway lets have a look at how the 2010 election betting is going as of last Friday....Oh dear its the usual bad news for the Right wing of the ASF.
~
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?