This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Has the 100 year Jihad (war) begun ... ???

More on Saudi...


Saudi Arabia, an ISIS That Has Made It​



More on link below...

 
WikiLeaks cables portray Saudi Arabia as a cash machine for terrorists



More on link below...

 

Aren't all Man brothers? It's quite literal in a Biblical sense isn't it?

Australia is a great country with good people. Even its racists are patriotic for the right reasons. So what's not to like?

I mean, some might have too much anger and weren't brought up right, but the vast majority of what we'd call a racist or anti-Islam/Muslim... xenophobic I guess... they "dislike" others for the right reasons - just they got their facts wrong. Can't fault people for that.

If a person believe that Islam is the root of evil, a death cult; If they believe Islam followers are therefore terrorists out to destroy the world, subjugate women, intolerant towards others, are funding terrorists with their Halal, hates democracy etc.... well those are good reasons to hate something. IF the facts proves true.

If they dislike refugees or welfare recipients thinking refugees are here to one day cause terrorism or otherwise just leech off the country's generosity; or that all welfare recipients are parasites and cheats and draining the national treasury... Those are good reasons, and good people would dislike such things.

IF the reasons are genuine; if they honestly dislike refugees and welfare for such reason... what is to hate about such people?

So we try to bring them the facts, make the case. And if they listen and think about it... if it makes sense to them, minds might change.. the heart would have already been in the right place.

----

What I don't like are those psychotic, amoral "statesman" who willingly work with and do deals with tyrants and dictators and terrorists.. all as long as it serve their interests. Then turn around and give liberal speeches about morality and freedom and stuff.

And I don't like them farkers who put their people, and the world, in danger... Then when danger and death hits home, use those death to further their own political objectives.

Then those well spoken, well paid, well dressed and well titled prostitutes who know better but sell out their own conscience for a few silver coins - and in the process selling out their country and their people.

Anyway...
 
It's a matter of how you sort the good from the bad.

You can wait until someone goes on a killing rampage or you can take some preventative action, collect intelligence, and don't let the potential enemy get too strong or too numerous.

There are no Pre-Crime Unit so yea, we'd have to wait until a crime has taken place or is in the process of taking place to find the perpetrator guilty and execute them or something.

Or we can build concentration camps; or use drones and blow up people we think are terrorists then define terrorist are someone who also say bad stuff about us and who we think is an imminent danger to our safety then define "imminent" as "maybe, one day, in the future some day" they'd do something, maybe...

One will create a few unhappy people and break all kind of constitutional argle bargle, maybe push aside a few treasured value and sense of justice; the others is to keep doing what we do and blame them for being so sensitive about us sending our troops overseas liberating their people and maybe a relative or two of theirs.

---

I'm guessing there are profilers and agents we got all over the usual suspects and their friends place. But no matter how much metadata you collect or spies you got out there... we can't be successful and caught all of them all of the time.

Maybe 15 years so far isn't that clear; but then if we count British imperialism in the ME it'd be some 200 years... maybe one ought to conclude that if the aim is to win, more bombs and deadlier police and higher security won't win us this war.

We're definitely not going to lose to the terrorists, and not to any ME countries. BUt this war might break national unity; drain a lot of money towards "securing" everything around and inside our borders and give our masters of war unlimited power and resource to go offshore and take the fights to them enemies everywhere there somewhere.

With these, we might not have enough to educate the kids properly; they might become xenophobic idiots hating and fearing each other; and abroad not making too many friends with the countries we operates in; and to put the cherry on top, tick off a nuclear power, driving it into the arms of another nuclear power - but one that's been growing, resting and making friends all over the place with real money.
 
All good reason not to accept the seed of future problem in a country which is economically going fast against a wall, this way we will be able to send people to uni so that theyu can discuss good leftist theory, and live in lalaland.
something which worries me today Luutzu:
based on your dedication to portrait any muslim as a saint and refugees as the future of Australia (how lucky these Germans must feel):
I am worried by and I quote your use of:"So we try to bring them the facts, make the case. And if they listen and think about it... if it makes sense to them, minds might change.. "
"WE" that would explain a lot: why be an individual free spirit and use logical and cartesian thinking when you can follow a party, an organisation or just an employer...We???? aka the Saudis? the Islam council ? The "green"?
We? The fews blessed by the light? I would be disappointed but that would explain your dedication
 
Ruskies Isis and Turkey:




Another Vietnam?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

It's Leftist dreaming in lalaland that make Western democracies what it was, and somewhat still is.
You're not going to tell me the Capitalists voluntarily went ahead with such nonsense as prohibiting child labour, work safety, equal rights, voting for women and the Coloured people; or want to provide social security/welfare so the poor can have a chance, or those citizens in dire strait won't spiral down towards homelessness.

Look at what happen when the NeoCons and their market is king, invisible hand economics take over some 40 years ago. Every man for himself; the rich got rich because they're talented and work hard; the poor got poor because they're lazy and stay poor because they take drugs... not at all because their wages were freezed or declined even though their productivity goes up; not because public funding were cut; or that both parents need to work a couple jobs each to make ends meet...

When everything that's worth selling the gov't sells. Smart move selling monopolies and infrastructure all citizens depends on.

---

I never said all Muslims are saints, or all Muslims or all any group are one way or another.

I never said refugees are the future of any country. I said that from the little I do read into it, it has been shown that refugees, after an average of some 10 to 20 years, make a positive contribution to the country that took them in. Before those tangible, measurable benefits kicks in, they benefit by doing jobs most citizens don't want to do, getting paid at rates people don't want to be paid at.

And yes, Germany is benefiting from their recent refugee intake. I saw an interview where an economist said Germany still have a manufacturing base, its population is aging and new refugees and low wages are a welcoming economic boost. Countries like the US, and I guess Australia, have less of any manufacturing so their generosity towards refugees are a lot less.

It's a bit much to blame refugees for our economic woes when we see big corporations paying practically nothing on their profits.

And why would refugees more likely than any other group to become terrorists? Because they're Muslims? They just escaped from war and terrorists, who in their right mind would then risk or throw all the potentials, the peace and security their family had just been given and commit terrorism?

I use "we" because using "I" would be presumptuous. That and I don't do anything but sit on my behind all day; that and all these stuff I write I learn from other much smarter people than myself. So it's more honest to use "we" rather than I. But no, I don't belong to any political party, not even the Greens.
 
how can this love of refugees (not to say illegal immigrants) be compatible with the anticapitalist view is beyond me and a sign of profund ignorance of the reality..
Wild capitalism is the only winner of uncontrolled borders.
Last week end elections in France are showing to the left what the real grassroot struggling class feel and is subjected by migration AND mate's capitalism.
Voters for the far right are not your typical liberals members and the far right there is the main party for youngest voters.
Of course this party policies are rubbish, there is no way back for Europe but still better than the corrupt duopoly in place and that party has a clear position on migration.
Better dying fighting than enslaved
 

Who's proposing wild uncontrolled borders? Not me.

Refugees are vetted. Process takes up to two years. They have to be found to be genuine refugees, and we should all know those tests aren't "just tell us you're scared of the bombs over your head" kind of evidence right?

We shouldn't talk about us being humane, us being liberators, us being good people... when we tell those seeking refuge to shove off and go back to where they came from because we can't be asked to check their stories, can't take the chance that one day they might turn out to be bad people or terrorists.

Should we talk about us being liberal, us caring for one another, us being united as a people... then wouldn't mind if welfare are cut, social services to the needy among us cut... all just in case those "parasites" abuse it, and if not parasites, then they ought to know it's every man for himself.

There's a little party in Germany during the 1930s and 40s that think the same way. And they got their chance at power to carry out many of those policies too. Jews? Look at their funny nose and blah blah. Disabled people? Mental handicap people? Gays? Well they didn't want their great society to be eating away by such parasites and obviously evil people did they?
 
Clover Moore (Mayoress of Sydney City) shows how out of touch she is....

Sydney siege ‘wasn’t terrorist event’, Lord Mayor Clover Moore says

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/ne...lover-moore-says/story-fni0xqrc-1227645786544

Not good form to offend our guests, it's just not cricket. I'm sure if we were seeking refuge in ISISland and drawing on their social services, building churches and wearing our national uniform, they too would be reluctant to label us because of the barbaric and devious actions of one, two, a few hundred expats?
 
Germany shuts down mosque over ‘ISIS sponsoring & recruiting’​



 
Two arrested in Sydney counter-terrorism raids, Woolloomooloo naval base among locations discussed​






Is anyone surprised of the names?
 
Two arrested in Sydney counter-terrorism raids, Woolloomooloo naval base among locations discussed​





Is anyone surprised of the names?

Yeah Serbian extraction beak dealing with Muslims ... that can't be good for the terrorists.
 
Well, looks like Germany (and much of Europe), is in the poo-poo.


I think in 10 - 20 years time, Germany won't be the country that we see it as today.



Germany manhunt for 12 people who entered country on same stolen passports as Paris attackers​



 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...