This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Haneef vs Andrews

From Inside Yahoo:



Another win-win situation for lawyers
 
yup...

From The Australian
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22279854-2702,00.html

Timing of email supports Haneef
 


He gave false information on his resume “The matter has been referred to police, the Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) and the Medical Board.”

Pretty heavy stuff.
 
He gave false information on his resume “The matter has been referred to police, the Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) and the Medical Board.”

Pretty heavy stuff.

Do you think he should not have been sacked, Happy? Or the matter referred to he CMC?
 
A doctor i used here in the West was found guilty of not telling the truth to the medical board (i think) got two years in jail.

Pity because i thought he was a good quack

Focus
 
the good doctor or supporter of haters of our values has won round one
A very ambiguous remark!
Minister Andrews is poorly advised, as were the incompetent Federal Police who failed to undertake rudimentary tests of evidence before acting against Dr Haneef.
Undeterred, Andrews considers his original decision (which remains factually baseless) was in the public interest.
Lefties reckon this smacks of "children overboard" and "weapons of mass destruction" truths that suckered the public into nationalistic fervors at the time.
Underlying these matters are the more important concerns of rights and freedoms.
Recently enacted legislation conveys cascading offences so that those charged with terrorist activities have no right to know of the evidence against them. While their legal representatives may similarly be kept in the dark, they also carry the burden of a prison sentence for telling others what little they know.
In the context of the Haneef affair, Minister Andrews can still rightly hide from the Courts his rationale for acting as he did, because it is possible he has "secret" information that no others have a right to know.
Indeed, if the Commonwealth wins its appeal against Haneef's favourable judgement, it may well be due to an inability to elicit from Andrews information which he will deem not in the public interest as it would affect our nation's ability to protect itself from further acts of terrorism.
I surmise that Joseph Heller is well read amongst drafters of our anti-terrorism legislation.
 
Somewhere I saw that overseas doctor's applications fell by 80%
Then I came past this snippet:



On top of not truthful work experience claims, there seems to be reluctance to test in case doctors might fail to pass.

It is almost pays to look after health in order not to take part in this experiment.
 
Regardless of what is said.

Haneef was involved with a criminal element to some degree. why leave on a one way ticket if your just going to see your wife for a short trip. The sms and chat room issue was never resolved.

At the end of the day if there is some reason of doubt in any terrorism case i would rather that person is in custody or deported then see a shopping center blown up or similar.

Call me right wing and American but if it was not for a small stupid group of individuals none of this would have ever been a issue.

You can't use terror as a tool to change the policies and actions of any country or group!

If he was a terrorist and blow up a gold coast shopping center, I really doubt any one would care about his civil rights then!

My
 

LOL, you dont happen to live in Queensland do you?

Brad
 
the good doctor or supporter of haters of our values has won round one

round two and looking increasingly like game, set and visa to the good doctor

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2007/203.html

here the full bench is not to be mistaken for the fools bench

on that sits andrews unable to fathom his new-found irrelevance

what pressures will the intelligence architecture seek to apply

congrats to those fighting the good fight

cheers
 
As a guest living in Australia, I was really embarrased for the country as a whole. This case was shambolic fom beginning to end, with very little credible evidence to support the claim Mr Haneef was supporting terrorism. By all accounts he was an excellent doctor and was very popular with his co-workers. I say if he decides to return, give him his old job back.

Looks like Andrews is on the canvas after taking several power shots....
 
If and when he comes back, can Haneef sue the government?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/21/2125890.htm

 
trinity ,
watching the news, you'd guess he was more interested in "clearing his reputation".
but time will tell.
not much point speculating till there's an announcement one way or the other I guess.
 
watching the news, you'd guess he was more interested in "clearing his reputation". but time will tell. not much point speculating till there's an announcement one way or the other I guess.


imho, people will be whispering to him left and right. And, yeah, you are right, time will tell.


Merry Christmas ...
 
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/01/17/2141056.htm?section=justin

 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...