- Joined
- 2 June 2011
- Posts
- 5,341
- Reactions
- 242
12 months on the stock is up 150% to $6. Trades at a lofty PE of 70x reported EPS of 8.54. Management said underlying NPAT was $6.4m so EPS is 17.1c - still 35x.
They said they plan to acquire 1-2 practices per month at EBIT multiples of 3-4.5 times. GXL itself trades at 18x.
Not sure how this disconnect works?!
It's hard to see how one make excess return on GXL at this level.
I'm glad I'm not the only one scratching their head over this. Virtually all their growth is from acquisition and acquisitions have been and are more than OCF. It's like the market is ignoring the cost of acquistions and pretending this is all organic growth done on a couple of million bucks capex. How bizarre, how bizarre.
Employee expense still rising, now almost at 50% of revenue. Could this be related to once the old vets retire the cost of getting in a new vet, without a equity stake in the business, isn't as cheap as the business model calls for?
It's such a dis-incentive to keep working hard when you get paid out when acquiried. It's a great retirement present / excuse for those who are close. The recent buyout of Sinclair Knight Merz would be a great case study. Buying an engineering consultant which are basically people who could leave any moment... esp the senior partners who on average pocket a few $m. That's not the kind of lump sum that eingeers are used to. Makes you wonder what sort of retention rate they've factored in.
FYI, the retention rate at engineering consultant firms is abysmal. Staff (the grunts) follow the work and $$$. The business model is no different to most other professional services firm i.e. Partner (owns stock, provides “leadership”) => Manager (desperate to own stock, manages "issues") => Grunt (does the work). Zero competitive advantage - more a case of right time, right place and a sharp pencil on the proposal paperwork.
Spot on. I read a Wilson's report which basically has revenue doubling up in 3 years and EPS pretty much growing inline... when in fact EPS will grow much slower as acquisitions are often equity funded.
FYI, the retention rate at engineering consultant firms is abysmal. Staff (the grunts) follow the work and $$$. The business model is no different to most other professional services firm i.e. Partner (owns stock, provides “leadership”) => Manager (desperate to own stock, manages "issues") => Grunt (does the work). Zero competitive advantage - more a case of right time, right place and a sharp pencil on the proposal paperwork.
Wilson like WAM or Wilson HTM? Geoff Wilson is usually pretty clued up on these sort of things, I couldn't imagine him coming up with those forecasts??
Wilson HTM. Report dated 13 Sept. I just cleared my email trash bin this morning so I can't find the report anymore.
Employee expense still rising, now almost at 50% of revenue. Could this be related to once the old vets retire the cost of getting in a new vet, without a equity stake in the business, isn't as cheap as the business model calls for?
They're merging with Petbarn. 15x EBITDA.
Next years NPAT is proforma @ 10.9M and equity component is 325M
that equates to them paying a P/E of 30!
with the additional 78M in debt taken on NIBD/EBIT will be over 3x
Something nice to say......... at least they used their own overpriced shares to pay for it.
Next years NPAT is proforma @ 10.9M and equity component is 325M
that equates to them paying a P/E of 30!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?