Value Collector
Have courage, and be kind.
- Joined
- 13 January 2014
- Posts
- 12,237
- Reactions
- 8,484
Well my comment was in response to explode, who said it is a great long term investment, so you will have to take it with him.
Gold is a terrible long term investment.
I don't consider gold a currency, you would be stretching the concept to make it fit, It certainly wouldn't be a practical one. It does fit the definition of asset though and it is most certainly a commodity.
You posted
And regardless who it was in response to, you said it...so i attempted to enlighten you along the same lines as Sinner has.
Its irrelevant what you consider gold to be or not be, again i was attempting to enlighten you about why the price of Gold does what it does, and as i was taught on this very forum many years ago, to really understand what's going on with Gold you have to look at it as a currency.
Another thing i learnt on this forum a long time ago was that nothing or at least very little to to be gained from talking, enlightenment can only come from listening (reading) and getting the message...seeing from a different perspective.
Apparently most central banks do consider it a currency......Originally Posted by Value Collector
I don't consider gold a currency, you would be stretching the concept to make it fit, It certainly wouldn't be a practical one. It does fit the definition of asset though and it is most certainly a commodity.
Substitute references to gold for <fiat cash> & you have the same points?Originally Posted by Value Collector
Sinner,
I wouldn't call gold risk free,
1, you are at the risk of it dropping in value for perhaps most of you life (look at the last big crash)
2, as you rightly mentioned, it exists in the physical plain, and there for somebody can walk away with it, theft is a risk.
3, If you decide to hold paper gold, or lock it in a bank volt to prevent risk, then you do have counter party risk and you also lose consistently on the fees for the space your renting.
4, you could also end up buying phony bars.
1, Apparently most central banks do consider it a currency......
2, Substitute references to gold for <fiat cash> & you have the same points?
3, So here we are 5 years since the start of the GFC with over $10Trillion of fresh new fiat either just sitting in banks reserves so they can buy back shares or pay huge bonuses with their other free cash flows and yet the global GDP is barely hobbling along at a positive rate. That is, debt is buying less growth.
The problem with the reduced free float of equities, and the recession cycle getting ever closer, is that when the equity selling starts in earnest there won't be any buyers.......and at the end of the day trillions in phony fiat equity wealth will be simply evaporated literally overnight, setting of a domino effect through the other so called stores of value like housing etc.
The 3 parts of the GFC -
1 - the 'crisis' - the tipping point of leveraged counter party risk at the end of several central bank induced bull cycles ie property
2 - the bail-out - by the money printers and the apperance of normality and calm
3 - the crash - the absense of real growth and broad based prosperity paid for by debt/printing facilitates the collapse of the bubble created by (2)
Do your best while the sun shines for fiat but have a plan to keep it when the bubbles burst.........
1, Well the Fed doesn't,
2, I don't believe I ever said cash was risk free, It was Sinner who brought up the topic of gold being risk free, I was just pointing out that it is not.
3, this is a really interesting lecture series if you want to learn a about the feds response to the gfc, I think you will find it more informative than the conspiracy pages.
The Fed doesn't have a clue about the economy let alone gold, as can be seen with their pump, bail-out & now dump policies over the years.
We all know what the Fed's response was - pump/print up reserves and buy up all the crap from those who took advantage of the Feds policies and legislation changes. The problem now is that the Fed is the market, compounded by the ever reducing free-float of equites......
It's a pity those uni students are wasting their time doing a degree in economics when all you have to know is how much the central bank is buying and or printing every week, then buy equities and other risk-on junk regardless?
Looks like risk off today though, gold up to $1264..........Germany still wants their gold back......who will be the last holding fiat at crunch-time.............China banking system comes under pressure, Chinese prefer gold.....
The Fed doesn't have a clue about the economy let alone gold, as can be seen with their pump, bail-out & now dump policies over the years.
Ok, so the fed don't have a clue, the world economy is going down the toilet and Germany wants their gold back
Good luck with that
By reading through this thread I can see you have held the same view for a number of years, How long till you admit your wrong, the world economy is doing a lot better than you give it credit for.
I would love to see you run the US ecconomy any better. it's so easy to call the shots from a key board whole diffent thing when your at the helm.
back to gold.
based off the daily and weekly Gold looks good for a rally IMO. I have bought a small position. looking for higher lows and highs to continue.
Sounds like you've never lived through a recession, part of the Pollyanna sunshine & lollypops generation??
There will be recessions, so what?
Look at last century, many recessions, a great depression, world wars, oil shocks, rise and fall of communism, pandemics, and probably a thousand other things, But through out all of it, owning good businesses and compounding earnings into more investments absolutely smashed holding gold.
Even if you started your investment program right before the great depression, if you dollar cost averaged into the dow jones, you would have achieved 8% compounded growth.
If the leverage that exists now disappeared the price of everything would collapse because of deflation, including gold, where as fiat currency would go up in relative terms, so your basic premise is wrong when you spout about fiats.
But projections for growth hinge on several assumptions, and the IMF warns of nasty spillovers from policies in some of the world’s biggest economies: like a dangerous government fiscal impasse in America, incomplete reform in Japan, and stagnation and high unemployment across the euro area. Emerging markets, many of which have already seen destabilising capital outflows and sinking asset prices, may struggle to weather the storm.
what was your point?
To see what gold can do during and after a crash go back to 1987 in the charts. Nearly 18 years before it recovered.
To see how holding a portfolio of "good" businesses for income can work open up the monthly charts for AMP, TLS, MQG, and if your data is old enough have a look at OneTel and HIH, all "good" portfolio stocks many moons ago, not so good now for those that retired in 2000.
...if you don't have the skill set required to build a quality portfolio of businesses and property like I suggest, simply buy the index and you will still smash gold long term.
Although, you haven't bothered to actually check the data to verify your claims that the index will smash gold in the long term, have you?
I already posted one chart to show that this has been a patently false statement for some time with the ESY00/GCY00 ratio.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?