explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,198
While we are on the subject of reality explod, I am intrigued by a statement you made a few posts back, viz;
In what ways do you consider Wayne to be your superior? Is it in intellect, ability, politics or what?
Or is it because he is a moderator?
Good question though
Well, if it is a good question, then it deserves an answer, not just more rambling philosophy. In what ways do you consider Wayne superior to you?.
Sheer numbers champ, he has more than 11,000 posts, I
Ah, Wayne, so thoughtful.PS - That includes the ladies too.
Sheer numbers is no qualification whatsoever. .
Also a knowledge of a second language, an ability to think outside the oblong, and a sense of humour would help many posters keep their knickers unknotted.
gg
A good point and taken on board too.
However I would be concerned at a squeezing of the parameters. An open and frank discussion on the facits of gobbledygook must not only take in "reality" IMHV.
To evaluate for example "dreaming" and its sometimes near partner "rubbish", which could of course be averred to as a part of the criteria for a meaning of "gobbledygook", then we may have to allow some considerable flexibility.
Have any ASF'ers studied the Da da movement, it was from memory a branch of performance art which grew off the surrealist movement in art of around the early 1940's when everyone (perhaps some) became very mad at the effects of rising Narzism. This movement attempted (and succssfully in my view) to elicit a meaning or message from absolute repetition. Probably where Warhole got some of his idea of the soup can paintings some 25 odd years later.
So untill we can get an angle on this thread that brings all the players properly into it (and along would be great), we ought in my view keep a fairly open mind. Not wanting to dominate or (hate this word) dictate, (which is why Hitler kicked the Da da and all the other outside the square movements out anyway) but to just settle this idea of examining gobbledygook in.
I'm not wishing to be unreasonably critical, but I'm just rather puzzled as to what you're actually setting out to achieve with this thread?
Explod, when I read the title of this thread I made the perhaps incorrect assumption that you would be against 'gobbledygook', assuming you'd share my belief that this is obfuscation, waffle and meaningless combinations of words.
But I'm beginning to wonder if I was quite wrong, and in fact your intention is to actually promote unclear communication, such is the confusing nature of your posts in this thread.
I think it is my fault. A few weeks back on another thread I labelled one of explod's nonsensical posts as "gobbledygook." The word fascinated him so much, that ever since, all his posts have been an attempt to reinforce my assessment.
I have the sinking feeling that we will never know what he is on about.:dunno:
I'm pretty much with you here, Logique. Also feel a vague need for a translation from the so far impressively esoteric nature of the exchange between explod and gg.
However, happy to see it continue in the interests of elevating the intellectual content of ASF!
OK, this was my objection, and perhaps I was being a bit cranky. I appreciate that the term is widely applied to people generically.
I just hate being addressed thus: largely because (a) it just seems thoughtless and lazy, and (b) because it's yet another Americanism that Australians seem to have embraced.
We used to say 'programme', now everywhere it's 'program'. Much of this alteration to our version of English I accept as inevitable, but being addressed as a 'guy' is something that I just dislike intensely. But probably I have to just suck it up, as the current idiom suggests.
On the thread topic, one of the obvious problems of communicating via printed screens is that we don't have the benefit of vocal tone, and facial expressions, along with body language. We all have different interpretative styles. Mine is regrettably literal, so often I don't pick it up when someone is meaning to be funny.
I'll always respect genuinely expressed comments on ASF, whether I agree with the sentiment or not. What does stifle debate, however, is the post that simply seeks to disrupt or ridicule discussion. That's what I believe has driven many of our old and excellent members away.
Good topic to raise: thanks, explod.
Sheer numbers is no qualification whatsoever. Remember to go to the toilet once a day is healthy but to be going every hour has another name. So that rules out numbers. Take the motormouth, word numbers but information is often lost in the volume. rules out numbers again.
However I do give him credit for intelligent discussion stimulation over a range of topics even if I do not agree with him at times.
Hello,
explod, dont you have a dog you can discuss all these things with when you out walking?
the ladida movement
the dog hasnt got out has it
thankyou
professor robots
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?