- Joined
- 31 October 2006
- Posts
- 739
- Reactions
- 0
Who doesn't?You haven't heard about Antarctica getting colder or southern ocean ice increasing because they don't want to tell you.
I read, a few days ago, that 80% of babies of one specie of penguin in the Antarctic have died by freezing to death. It does not usually rain there as it's too cold. But now these babies become wet, when their parents go to catch food, as they have not yet grown their water resistant feathers. Of course this freezes... 'They' suggested that in ten years this penguin will be extinct.
stop burning fossil fuels ==>> Good ideaWhy is it wrong to say GW is a reason to stop burning fossil fuels, polluting the planet???
They've always been ignored. But GW opens up the opportunity for some real change. It has created more awareness of the surrounding environment for many. The GW debate has been a positive stimulus. I do not foresee any problems in pursuing the reduction of CO2 and other pollutants.stop burning fossil fuels ==>> Good idea
GW ==>> wrong reason and a red herring
polluting the planet ==>> right reason
Wile everyone freaks about co2, they ignore all the other pollutants that are wrecking the place.
E.g. going back to penguins. Populations are in decline due to a bunch of other reasons nothing to do with climate and everything to do with pollution and habitat destruction. Yet these factors are ignored.
What do you ponder jtb, when you see the ice melting? Any sense of loss?
FWIW it's kinda sad to see peeps writing off CC (possibly because they are self righteous lounge room asswholes) with no regard to what we may be losing. Ignorant?
There are more important reasons to change our ways, CC and GW just add to the argument.... "Why not change for the better???"
Or do some here think the human race is efficient enough?
Pat,They've always been ignored. But GW opens up the opportunity for some real change. It has created more awareness of the surrounding environment for many. The GW debate has been a positive stimulus. I do not foresee any problems in pursuing the reduction of CO2 and other pollutants.
The "awareness" can only bring more positive change for the better of the environment.
You see thats just the media taking things out of context.
You haven't heard about Antarctica getting colder or southern ocean ice increasing because they don't want to tell you.
Tens of thousands of newly-born penguins are freezing to death as Antarctica is lashed by freak rain storms.
Scientists believe the numbers of Adelie penguins may have fallen by as much as 80 per cent – and, if the downpours continue, the species will be extinct within ten years.
Temperatures on the Antarctic peninsula have risen by 3C over the past 50 years to an average of -14.7C and rain is now far more common than snow.
Adelie penguins are born with a thin covering of down and it takes 40 days for them to grow protective water-repellent feathers. With epic rains drenching their ancestral nesting grounds, their parents try to protect them. But when the adults leave to fish for food, or are killed by predators such as seals, the babies become soaked to the skin and die from hypothermia.
‘Everyone talks about the melting of the glaciers but having day after day of rain in Antarctica is a totally new phenomenon. As a result, penguins are literally freezing to death,’ said Jon Bowermaster, a New York-based explorer who has recently returned from Antarctica.
‘It is all very well talking theoretically about how the ice cap could disappear – but watching penguins walking among the skeletons of their young is the most powerful evidence of climate change I have seen.’
Biologist Professor P. Dee Boersma, of the University of Washington in Seattle, has published a study in the magazine BioScience in which she says that the warming climate is also threatening the Emperor penguin.
‘These penguins are sentinels who are showing we really are looking at big changes in the world’s climate.’
Sorry mate, you haven't yet. That was not directed at you (It wouldn't make sense for me to say that). Nor any other poster.Ouch Pat,
I don’t think I’ve ever been called a ‘self righteous lounge room asswhole’ before.
Sorry mate,
Yet to read your post, a few more beers and its bed time. Till tomorrow :bier:
so I post something put out by the UK met bureauIt is now time to cease your intellectual dishonesty of misrepresenting... no, downright lieing about the position of others that disagree with the fraud.
Cut it out 2020, fair warning.
Considering it has about as much validity at the flying spagetti monster, it would be wrong to not make fun of it.
On the other hand, taking it seriously is resulting in psychosis, as detailed on the other thread.
I read, a few days ago, that 80% of babies of one specie of penguin in the Antarctic have died by freezing to death. It does not usually rain there as it's too cold. But now these babies become wet, when their parents go to catch food, as they have not yet grown their water resistant feathers. Of course this freezes... 'They' suggested that in ten years this penguin will be extinct.
spooly , you say that "It should be the goal of the IPCC to find flaws in their model".This is what it boils down to Pat!
The problem is though, that the IPCC at the end of the day simply have a model.
All scientific models have restricted applicability, they should be thought of as representations of reality, not reality itself!
It should be the goal of the IPCC to find flaws in their model, this will highlight the areas where we need a better understanding...and I don`t think this can be denied when dealing with such a chaotic system.
They have made predictions ...lets see where the break down.
As for sickness running it`s course..... Whats happened to this system already can`t be changed.
As dj pointed out the earth is in feedback mode where every input produces an output which in turn becomes an input to the system again.
Inevitably (whenever that may be) this will lead to a phase change....our 2 nearest neighbours are testament to this.
Second polar bear spotted in Iceland
June 17, 2008 06:29pm
A POLAR bear has been sighted in northern Iceland having apparently made a journey of several hundred kilometres to get there, the second bear to make the trip in two weeks.
A 12-year-old girl on a farm near the town of Saudarkrokur, on the Skaga fjord, spotted the bear yesterday and alerted authorities, news agencies reported.
Two weeks ago the first polar bear seen in Iceland in 20 years was shot dead by police and footage of its death was posted on the internet.
The bear, an adult male weighing around 250kg, was presumed to have swum some 300km from Greenland or from a distant chunk of Arctic ice to Skagafjordur in northern Iceland.
It was planned to sedate the animal and move it back to Greenland but the police decided it was safest to kill the bear immediately.
"There was fog up in the hills and we took the decision to kill the bear before it could disappear into the fog”, said police spokesman Petur Bjornsson.
Caution graphic footage: A video of the polar bear's death was posted on the internt by a news channel.
Polar bears were recently listed as a threated species by the US because its Arctic sea ice habitat is melting due to climate change.
US government scientists have predicted that two-thirds of the polar bear population of 25,000 could disappear by 2050.
wayneL said:POLAR BEARS AREN'T DROWNING as the Al Bore imbecile foisted on a gullible and concerned public.
The receeding ice at the North Pole is jeopardising their future existence. As the ice breaks up, so their hunting and mating grounds go with it.
A spokesman for PolarWorld, a German group dedicated to the preservation of the polar regions and the creatures which inhabit it, called the bear’s death ...
'an avoidable tragedy...another great day for mankind'.
lol, asteism alert !But , to be fair, 2020 is not alone in this misrepresentation.
A backhanded compliment ..asteism.. an insult disguised as a compliment. It is generally used to belittle or condescend, or often one uses a backhanded compliment when one wants to insult someone in a subtle way.
An example of a backhanded compliment would be to tell a woman "I like your dress very much. It does wonders for your figure." This statement would seem on the surface to compliment the woman's choice in clothing, and perhaps even her figure, but closer examination reveals its true meaning: that the woman's figure is unattractive and needs improvement from clothing. This statement is not a compliment to the woman, but to the garment's ability to slenderize.
Backhanded compliments are not always intentional. The speaker may intend to pay a compliment, but in so doing accidentally reveal uncomplimentary feelings. For example, on the August 22, 2007 episode of The Daily Show, guest Barack Obama responded to the question of whether there were any Republicans he could agree with by saying "I think some of these folks are decent people," to which Jon Stewart responded with "Worst backhanded compliment ever."
or ...
"I want to be just like you when I get old";
Wayne, I believe your facetious comment above in actual fact represents the philosophy of much of the population.
And then there's another large group of people, myself included, who just don't know what to believe. I lack the scientific background to be able to properly evaluate all the screeds of urgings by both sides, and find that my innate suspicion of all things hysterical (which is what a lot of it comes across as to me) just turns me off.
Like many other things, e.g. fluoride, I am reminded of how powerless I am as an individual to have any say anyway, despite what I might believe.
So I just sigh and hope someone with wisdom sorts it all out.
It's a bit like the AA mantra about changing the things you can, accepting the things you can't, and having the wisdom to know the difference.
In the meantime, I hardly use my car, rarely fly, and have a green garden.
Keep walking to the pub. If nothing else, it's good for your health!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?