- Joined
- 14 December 2010
- Posts
- 3,472
- Reactions
- 248
I personally like the Idea of some sort of Like--Interest indicator
For me it would give me an idea where the interest lies and --- being time poor
where to direct what time I have. Speaking of course about threads where I post info and discuss ideas.
I understand that and it's why I saidAnd you would do this because you have been a member of the forum for some years, and therefore have already sorted the wheat from the chaff. From the perspective of a relative newbie, and one who did feel the need to seek information on a variety of investing/trading strategies, I can tell you that it is quite frustrating and time-consuming having to read some of the rubbish posts in order to uncover the gems.
skc, I get your reasons for wanting to rate trading type posts and believe this to be much less controversial than doing likewise with General posts. I just don't think you can reasonably apply the same treatment to trading/investment issues as to the much more subjective opinion relating to politics, religion etc.
And these people are also going to be issuing star ratings when they are less than qualified to judge.There are some posters on this forum who post as if they have been trading for decades and have a wealth of experience, but who it turns out are still quite young and trade with a very small capital base.
Agree.There are others who are not as arrogant or know-it-all who are actually the ones a learner should taken notice of, but whose posts can be lost amongst the chatter.
So how would it work? You'd see the people with multiple stars, then go through their posts to find what you're looking for?When I first joined this forum it took some time to figure out who was "talking the talk" and who was actually worth reading. Some of us are time poor, and a rating system would vastly improve the ability to quickly search out a post (on say how to work out free cash flow for example)
Yes, and this applies outside of the General Chat threads also in some instances, eg FA v TA.One other aspect to the general chat threads is that they could be dominated by a relatively small number of posters, and a rating system would only see them "agree" with each others posts, leading to less and less participants. I know there have been times I've read a thread and started to post a reply, only to think "why bother, it's obvious nobody is going to agree with me and I'd be attempting to change a closed mind", and refrained.
Understood, but the dissenting opinion is what makes a discussion interesting, or even just a question.If I saw from the outset that 80% or more of the "agrees" were for posts I disagreed with, I'd probably not ever bother at all. Then again, I guess it would also provide a way for those less inclined to stick their virtual heads up to be shot down a method of disagreeing with someone anonymously.....
When I click on "New Posts" it don't come up with New Posts.
gg
I would like to thank everyone for all the feedback and suggestions so far. If you think of anything else, please feel free to post about it in this thread.
I like that idea.
Just a little feature of some other forums that I read and a feature that I like is having a little icon next to the Original posters name everytime they post in the thread to show anyone reading the thread that he/she was the original poster. (Just a little easier sometimes to keep track of the original person posting in the thread).
I like that idea.
This is the first suggestion I have implemented, as it was relatively easy to add to the forums.
Hey Joe,
Was there supposed to be an ASF email invitation to a CMC Markets event? Seemed a bit unusual.
Yes, CMC Markets have been doing some advertising with ASF and I sent that out for them to promote their event.
Joe the winnings from the comp a while back got returned to you. Paypal said I wasn't signed up, but I am. They said to contact you to get it re-sent. Thanks.
The money never reached my bank account, even though I got a 'received payment' email from Paypal on May 2.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?