I thought about that sort of thing a couple of years ago. Watched MAK go from about 2.75 ish to 1.75 ish while I was waiting for the end of financial year thing. I had about 300k in it. Add that up. And it is at about 50c now.This one has already reached my initial target but I am just waiting for a couple more month so I won't have to pay too much tax. First time I had to worry about CGT lol.
I thought about that sort of thing a couple of years ago. Watched MAK go from about 2.75 ish to 1.75 ish while I was waiting for the end of financial year thing. I had about 300k in it. Add that up. And it is at about 50c now.
18 June 2010
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
ASSAYS CONTINUE TO CONFIRM MAJOR EXTENSIONS TO MCPHEE CREEK DISCOVERY
• More thick DSO hematite intersections from resource growth drilling at the 100% owned McPhee Creek main range discovery, located 220 kilometres south east of Port Hedland.
• Holes to east and down dip continue to show major extensions to current JORC resource, with many holes finishing in mineralisation;
o 96 metres (to end of hole) @ 58.6% Fe (65.1%CaFe), 1.6% Al2O3
o 104 metres @ 57.3% Fe, (63.5%CaFe), 1.9% Al2O3
o 72 metres (to end of hole) @ 60.5% Fe (65.8%CaFe), 1.5% Al2O3
o 68 metres (to end of hole) @ 58.5% Fe (63.4%CaFe), 2.9% Al2O3
Hmm, maybe even better than this. Looks like it could be a massive deposit.Looking at 100-140Mt plus which is almost a company maker in itself.
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
THICK HEMATITE INTERSECTED ACROSS ALMOST FULL WIDTH OF MCPHEE CREEK MAIN RANGE
• New results confirm Giralia’s model of extensive hematite mineralisation outside existing JORC resource and exploration target.
• Strong intersections across almost full width of McPhee Creek main range;
o 80 metres (to end of hole) @ 57.1% Fe (63.9%CaFe), 1.6% Al2O3
o 146 metres (to end of hole) @ 56.1% Fe (62.0%CaFe), 2.1% Al2O3
o 70 metres (to end of hole) @ 58.6% Fe (65.3%CaFe), 1.7% Al2O3
o 54 metres (to end of hole) @ 60.3% Fe (65.2%CaFe), 1.5% Al2O3
• Mineralisation up to 700 metres wide across range.
Hmm, maybe even better than this. Looks like it could be a massive deposit.
146m at 56%Fe eoh?
Yes, good points grace. They are some time away from mining and while 220km to Port is closer than some, opex will still be a major issue if prices fall.For Giralia, there is no question on the quality or quantity of their iron ore deposits. The question for Giralia is, will they get to mine it during this boom??? With China slowing, will we see iron ore prices slipping and then these exploration companies back at the 08 price levels???
8 July 2010
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
STRONG NEW DSO RESULTS FROM NORTHERN MCPHEE CREEK MAIN RANGE
• First results from resource drilling of the northern end of the McPhee Creek main range confirm more extensive hematite mineralisation;
o 112 metres (to end of hole) @ 57.7% Fe (63.3%CaFe), 0.06% P, including
74 metres (to end of hole) @ 60.3% Fe
o 100 metres @ 57.8% Fe (63.4%CaFe), 0.08% P
o 68 metres (to end of hole) @ 57.1% Fe (63.3%CaFe), 0.07% P
o 42 metres (to end of hole) @ 57.7% Fe (64.9%CaFe), 0.06% P
• Mineralisation significantly thicker than modelled in current JORC resource, and outside both current resource and Exploration Target.
• Interim resource upgrade anticipated within ~2 weeks, with all drilling data for southern 25% of range delivered to resource consultants.
Possibility of a game-changer Event
GIR has increased its DSO resource and exploration target at McPhee
Creek.
Impact
JORC resource capable of supporting a mid-size operation. The revised
McPhee Creek JORC resource is 161mt, at 56.2% Fe (62.2% CaFe); building
on the original 52mt resource along strike, the updated resource includes
mineralisation at the Southern end of McPhee Creek. GIR has increased its
McPhee Creek exploration target to 250-350mt, based on 100m+ iron ore
intersections from the northern end of the range.
This is a potential game-changer... In our view, the current 161mt resource
could potentially support a 5-10mtpa operation. This could enable GIR to
commit to infrastructure; infrastructure alternatives include building a haul
road to Port Hedland or building a rail spur or haul road to the Goldsworthy
rail line which has recently been declared open to public access by the
Australian Competition Tribunal.
... however, port capacity hurdle remains. GIR currently has no allocation
at Port Hedland. Until GIR can secure port capacity, McPhee Creek remains
stranded. Capacity at Utah Point, to be commissioned in September 2010,
seems to be fully allocated in the short term. The planned South West Creek
development, planned to commission 2013, could be another alternative;
however, GIR is not a member of the North West Iron Ore Alliance which is
planning to build infrastructure there. Given the potentially larger throughput
premised on the increased McPhee Creek resource, the game for port
capacity has also changed for GIR. We understand that GIR management
continues discussions with the Port Hedland Port Authority.
Earnings and target price revision
We increase our target price to A$2.99ps from A$2.50.
Price catalyst
12-month price target: A$2.99 based on a DCF methodology.
Catalyst: Further resource upgrade at McPhee Creek expected end August
Action and recommendation
We rate GIR Outperform with a target price of A$2.99ps.
24 August 2010
ASX ANNOUNCEMENT
STRONG DSO RESULTS FROM HOMESTEAD PROSPECT AT WESTERN CREEK
• Strong new DSO results returned from a 59 hole RC drilling program completed in July at Homestead Marra Mamba prospect at Giralia’s 100% owned Western Creek project;
42 metres @ 59.1% Fe from 6 metres
24 metres @ 61.7% Fe from 10 metres
58 metres @ 57.9% Fe from 52 metres
• Significant hematite mineralisation now intersected over 1.6 kilometres strike.
• The Homestead deposit is 10 kilometres north of Giralia’s current 52.4 million tonne Marra Mamba resource at Western Creek, located only 15 kilometres from railway and train loading facilities at Newman.
• Increase to Western Creek project resource likely.
Does anyone have views on where GIR will stop -
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?