- Joined
- 3 July 2009
- Posts
- 27,866
- Reactions
- 24,922
Sums her and Labor up beautifully, F you get out of my way, and by the way what about equality.
Beautiful, just beautiful, personifies the whole issue.
Great post.logique
Oh dear, somebody has been outmanoeuvred. And their slip is showing, how quickly the halo slips.
Penny Wong will find it much harder to brainwash everyday Australians than a small number of timorous parliamentarians.
You're equal Penny. But guess what, we're equal too.
Sums her and Labor up beautifully, F you get out of my way, and by the way what about equality.
Beautiful, just beautiful, personifies the whole issue.
Great post.logique
What a beat up.
Hockey says "Hello Penny". Wong replies "Hello". What is wrong with that?
You guys and Andrew Bolt are pathetic.
You didn't notice how long Hockey stood there, in a passive pose?
You didn't notice the persona of Penny, get the FF out of my way?
You have got absolutely NOTHING, and you need to toughen up if you get so easily scared by a lesbian senator walking through a doorway.
If she said "Hello Joe you fat c", you might have had something to work with.
Will be interesting to see if the two closeted gay men on the front bench cross the floor.
No need to get your knickers in a knot, it was what it was, you can make of it what you want.
It just looked to me as though she was thinking " get out of my way you fat c", she didn't actually say anything.
But a picture can say a thousand words.
Just because you want to excuse bad manners, doesn't mean we all have to.
People with too much time on their hands methinks
Discrimination, is discrimination, you can't it tailor to suit you personal circumstances, or sexual preferences.
You can't just say its not discrimination because, it doesn't affect you, or isn't in line with your arguement.lol
The Constitution says nothing about Gay Marriage, otherwise the laws would have been challenged already.
International "Conventions" ? Well we have self government so we don't have to take any notice of those.
And you neatly sidestepped my point which is that someone has to vote to change the Marriage Act, it's a question of whether you think that the politicians know better than the people on this issue.
If you can't see a difference between setting qualification rules for something like retirement based on age, and setting qualification rules based on race or sexuality, you are either just being silly or you are genuinely stupid.
I wasn't setting qualification rules on retirement, I was setting qualification rules on access to entitlements.
If you can't see the difference, you are either being silly or being genuinely stupid.
But then again it doesn't support your argument, so feel free to making a baseless conclusion.
By the way isn't you statement of discrimination on race and sexuality, a personal bent on the phrase, race and sex( i.e male or female/)
By the way, you seem to flapping around, like a chook. Don't mean to be rude, but read through the posts and replies.
People joining the thread have to have some idea of context, when reading the post.IMO
By the way the post refered to was 1634 on the previous page, for anyone that is interested, which I doubt.lol
By the way isn't you statement of discrimination on race and sexuality, a personal bent on the phrase, race and sex( i.e male or female/)
I agree with Tony Abbott that the people should decide...Not politicians or activity groups should be allowed to decide to change the laws in this case.
If two gays want to live with each other and have a binding relationship, how will a piece of paper keep them together/
Oh dear, somebody has been outmanoeuvred. And their slip is showing, how quickly the halo slips.
Penny Wong will find it much harder to brainwash everyday Australians than a small number of timorous parliamentarians.
You're equal Penny. But guess what, we're equal too.
I said that the majority doesn't have the right to deny basic human rights to minorities.
I agree with Tony Abbott that the people should decide...Not politicians or activity groups should be allowed to decide to change the laws in this case.
/
Finally you agree with something Rumpole has been advocating for the last half decade or more
Will be interesting to see if the two closeted gay men on the front bench cross the floor.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?