- Joined
- 5 October 2011
- Posts
- 896
- Reactions
- 0
I am no evolutionary biologist, however, if gay people are given the exact same rights as heterosexual people (which they should be) won't gay people become extinct?
So how many unusual or socially irregular behaviours that are hard wired, do you cater for?
Can all irregular human behaviour, just be catered for and if so where is the line drawn between tolerance, promiscuity and decadence?
Not that I have a strong belief about the issue, just sick of being hijacked by minorities deciding what is best.
So if you think its due to bad parenting that this has all come about, how are the next generations going to understand about families, mummy daddy and children.
The children have no choice but to always be in broken homes.
Is this what we want children to grow up with?
As for the religious side of things, I have already said that its about procreating.
Its not about sitting there googly eyeing each other.
I can understand what you are saying that gays should have the right to marry, but I dont think they should hijack the word marraige.
Marraige and children go hand in hand
Marraige is a word about families and thats how it should stay for future generations.
Given your theory, there should already be no gay people? It would appear they are increasing in numbers.
I disagree. Due to society's ignorance, homosexuals have been forced into heterosexual relationships which has led to a greater chance of homosexuals reproducing and passing on their genes to the next generation. Society's decreasing ignorance and slowly increasing acceptance of homosexuality, is why "it would appear they are increasing in numbers."
What if a gay couple have a wedding is that hijacking the name as well.
Homosexuality is a gene malfunction and is most likely heredity in most cases things like emotions are also heredity that's why Milat and others can kill with out remorse and then you get the other extreme were the person is so in love with their victim they stalk them a lot in prison have a mental disorder and throwing them in jail is not the answer finding out were the brain went wrong and finding a cure is the answer.
What if a gay couple have a wedding is that hijacking the name as well.
Homosexuality is a gene malfunction and is most likely heredity in most cases things like emotions are also heredity that's why Milat and others can kill with out remorse and then you get the other extreme were the person is so in love with their victim they stalk them a lot in prison have a mental disorder and throwing them in jail is not the answer finding out were the brain went wrong and finding a cure is the answer.
Great summary. Though homosexuals marrying the opposite sex in order to cover up their true sexuality is imo much less common than it was several decades ago. Back then, many young women were cruelly used by male homosexuals in their quest to creat a facade of 'normality'.I disagree. Due to society's ignorance, homosexuals have been forced into heterosexual relationships which has led to a greater chance of homosexuals reproducing and passing on their genes to the next generation. Society's decreasing ignorance and slowly increasing acceptance of homosexuality, is why "it would appear they are increasing in numbers."
If the last two humans on Earth were a man and a woman, and they were both gay/lesbian, would they fall in love?
Hm
A marriage (of sorts) that has come to an end.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-19/controversy-over-cory-bernardi-bestiality-comments/4269604
How they voted:
MARRIAGE AMENDMENT BILL 2012
AYES, 42
Mr Albanese Mr Dreyfus Mr S. P. Jones Ms Roxon
Mr Bandt Mrs Elliot Dr M. J. Kelly Ms Saffin*
Ms Bird Ms Ellis Ms King Mr Shorten
Ms Brodtmann Mr Garrett Ms Livermore Mr Sidebottom
Mr Butler Mr Georganas Ms Macklin Mr S. F. Smith
Mr Champion Mr Gibbons Mr Marles Ms Smyth
Mr Cheeseman Mr Gray Mr Oakeshott Mr Snowdon
Mr Clare Ms Grierson Ms Parke Mr C. R. Thomson
Ms Collins Mr Griffin Mr Perrett Mr Wilkie
Mr Combet Ms Hall* Ms Plibersek
Mr Crean Mr Jenkins Ms Rishworth
NOES, 98
Mr Abbott Mr Entsch Mr McCormack Mr Rudd
Mr Adams Mr Fitzgibbon Mr Macfarlane Mr Ruddock
Mr Alexander Mr Fletcher Ms Marino Mr Schultz
Mr K. J. Andrews Mr Forrest Mrs Markus Mr Scott
Mrs K. L. Andrews Mr Frydenberg Mr Matheson Mr Secker*
Mr Baldwin Ms Gambaro Mr Melham Mr A. D. H. Smith
Mr Billson Mrs Gash Mrs Mirabella Mr Somlyay
Mrs B. K. Bishop Ms Gillard Mr Morrison Dr Southcott
Ms J. I. Bishop Mrs Griggs Mrs Moylan Dr Stone
Mr Bowen Mr Hartsuyker Mr Murphy Mr Swan
Mr Bradbury Mr A. G. Hawke Mr Neumann Mr Symon
Mr Briggs Mr Hayes Mr Neville Mr Tehan
Mr Broadbent Mr Hockey Mr O'Dowd Mr K. J. Thomson
Mr Buchholz Mr Hunt Ms O'Dwyer Mr Truss
Mr A. S. Burke Mr Husic Ms O'Neill Mr Tudge
Mr Byrne Mr Irons Ms Owens Mr Turnbull
Mr Chester Dr Jensen Mrs Prentice Ms Vamvakinou
Mr Christensen Mr E. T. Jones Mr Pyne Mr van Manen
Mr Ciobo Mr Katter Mr Ramsey Mr Vasta
Mr Cobb Mr Keenan Mr Randall Dr Washer
Mr Coulton* Mr C. Kelly Mr Ripoll Mr Windsor
Mr Crook Mr Laming Mr Robb Mr Wyatt
Mrs D'Ath Ms Ley Mr Robert Mr Zappia
Mr Dutton Mr Lyons Ms Rowland
Dr Emerson Mr McClelland Mr Wyatt Roy
No P.Wong? Thoought she'd be right up there.
It was a vote in the House of Reps, wasn't it? Ms Wong is in the Senate.
A marriage (of sorts) that has come to an end.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-09-19/controversy-over-cory-bernardi-bestiality-comments/4269604
But former South Australian senator Nick Minchin has defended the controversial Liberal, saying he cannot see why Senator Bernardi had to resign.
"His remarks have been quite mischievously and deviously conflated and misrepresented, and I think any fair and objective reading of what he was actually saying would lead the reasonable person to conclude that his was a perfectly proper defence of the traditional definition of marriage," Mr Minchin told ABC Radio.
"I certainly... see no reason for him to resign."
Mr Minchin says the speech was a "proper and appropriate" defence of the Liberal Party's long-standing support for the traditional definition of marriage.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?