Normal
one might think an aggregate 140% short position on a stock , was a recipe for some sort of disaster , regardless of mass participation who DIDN'T seem to participate much early on was the SEC .. ( too many buddies lined up for a piece of the kill perhaps ?? ) a mathematically inclined person might have been starting to scrutinize the trading as soon as net short positions approached 95% ( because surely some of those positions were naked shorts )
one might think an aggregate 140% short position on a stock , was a recipe for some sort of disaster , regardless of mass participation
who DIDN'T seem to participate much early on was the SEC .. ( too many buddies lined up for a piece of the kill perhaps ?? )
a mathematically inclined person might have been starting to scrutinize the trading as soon as net short positions approached 95% ( because surely some of those positions were naked shorts )
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.
