- Joined
- 30 June 2008
- Posts
- 15,622
- Reactions
- 7,495
My apologies @basilio .Hmmm GG. A few points
1) Not sure why you wanted to trash The Guardian. The story wasn't published there so I fail to see the connection.
2) The main story wasn't about trashing xorn as such. It was about the effect of xorn on children and teenagers and taking steps to limit their exposure. The women who started the campaign had extensive experience in dealing with sex addiction including young people.
3) Do you think only men become interested in/fixated/affected by xorn ? The two examples cited in the story were young girls.
Did you read the article UMike ? At all ? Do you know what it was about ?No idea why people want to control other people all the time.
Peeping into their private lives. Really perverted. Imposing their morales on others. very elitist.
I am
Did you read the article UMike ? At all ? Do you know what it was about ?
Nothing you said relates to the proposal to limit children under 18 from accessing on line xorn . And it certainly doesn't acknowledge the damage that is happening to children as a consequence of having their developing sexuality defined by some of the grossest images/stories imaginable.
There is a lot of focus in early primary school on sexuality, gender, gender indentification etc, it will be difficult to curb curiosity, when you are actively promoting it.How would age be checked for internet access ?
Times have changed.There is a lot of focus in early primary school on sexuality, gender, gender indentification etc, it will be difficult to curb curiosity, when you are actively promoting it.
It wasn't long ago, 6 and 7 year olds were interested in riding bikes, kicking a footy, playing marbles and there were a couple of kids in the class who were sexually aware.
Now we have most being sexually aware and a couple of kids in the class interested in riding bikes and kicking a footy, but we are doing a great job.
I bet your teacher wasnt asking you whether you identified as a boy or a girl either.Times have changed.
Can't remember what I was doing in primary school, but I was no Russel Brand.
I do feel quite guilty as I commented without reading it.Did you read the article UMike ? At all ? Do you know what it was about ?
Nothing you said relates to the proposal to limit children under 18 from accessing on line xorn . And it certainly doesn't acknowledge the damage that is happening to children as a consequence of having their developing sexuality defined by some of the grossest images/stories imaginable.
How would age be checked for internet access ?
I do feel quite guilty as I commented without reading it.
What is gross about sex anyway?. Also what makes pr0n worse than the endless amount of violence in movies, games ect.?
Who dictates at what age people can do what?
You Probably defend people campaigning to mutilating themselves to change sex.
I've read about some really horrific stories that have come out from the industry within the actors themselves committing suicide from drug use, family and friends abandonment. How it shapes the younger generations has consequences also, when I was a young lad kinky sex was limited to the backdoor passage but these days it has a whole new meaning. There have been a few studies done and many like to reenact what they see in current-day pron but which do you blame, the gun or the person that pulls the trigger, or both?Hmmm GG. A few points
1) Not sure why you wanted to trash The Guardian. The story wasn't published there so I fail to see the connection.
2) The main story wasn't about trashing xorn as such. It was about the effect of xorn on children and teenagers and taking steps to limit their exposure. The women who started the campaign had extensive experience in dealing with sex addiction including young people.
3) Do you think only men become interested in/fixated/affected by xorn ? The two examples cited in the story were young girls.
It offers effective but anonymous proof of being over 18.
For a while , until the hackers get to it.
Maybe they should just shut down the sites. (If they can).
I've had zero involvement with it personally but from a few conversations with those who have, it seems any aspect of the entertainment industry takes a huge toll on those involved.I've read about some really horrific stories that have come out from the industry within the actors themselves committing suicide from drug use, family and friends abandonment.
Don't know about what books are in schools these days, but there is a difference between "education" and violent pawnography with exploitation that apparently is available on the Internet.Just a question, have the pearl clutchers here perused the essentially p0rn0gr4phic books our (the west in general) schools promote to young children?
As much as I may agree with the point, until this is addressed, people like OP should STFU and contemplate on their monumental hypocrisy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?