This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Flood Levy - Do you agree?

What do yo think of the Gillard flood levy?

  • I agree with the flood levy and the current level seems right

    Votes: 24 21.2%
  • I agree with the flood levy but the current level is too low

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • I agree with the flood levy but the current level is too high

    Votes: 3 2.7%
  • I disagree with the flood levy

    Votes: 84 74.3%

  • Total voters
    113
and for the latest figures on national debt ..

http://www.debtclock.com.au/index.html

It appears you are correct, Australia doesnt have a dollar to its name ... just a lot of debt.
I love how Tasmania is ticking down at $3 every 5 seconds - every other state is whizzing down! And no, I'm not picking on our Tasmanian relatives.

It's not entirely correct though - I just paid off my credit card bill (it is due at the end of the month).
 

Thanks zz for reminding me, I must go online and pay mine.

Why can't the ole Jools let the people sort this out, go into budget deficit for a few years and we come out stronger at the end.

And get rid of the bloody NBN.

gg
 
Senator Cory Bernadi has a message for the people of Australia with a petition to stop the levy.

http://www.stopthelevy.com/

actually, that link has the following information ...

Stop The Levy is a project of Menzies House, a grassroots, independent online community for thinkers, writers and activists. We are not affiliated with any political party.

I cant see any message from Senator Cory Bernardi ... do you think the dear Senator is bandwagoning on what appears to be a popular cause ?
 

So what?
 
None of which changes the fact that we have already paid more than enough to cover this which was simply wasted on school halls we didn't need, faulty insulation and so on.

It is not about anyone not wanting to help people in Queensland. It is about a government having wasted a fortune of our taxes now wanting more money the moment a problem which they should have saved for arises. If it wasn't a flood in Qld then it would have been a fire in Vic or whatever. Sooner or later, something is sure to go wrong and any sensible person knows that.

It is comparable to someone who spends everything they earn and more, who then wants a bail out as soon as the car breaks down. Why not put some money aside each week like any sensible person does?
 
Thanks for the links, sinner. IFocus, you could just as easily have quoted the following from Michael Pascoe's piece:
Sadly, though, you wouldn't be up for drawing attention to anything which in any way derides your government. Can't help wondering if you are really too obtuse to see what a disaster they are, or whether pride just won't allow you to admit you've backed a losing horse.

To me, if a cyclone, fire or flood directly affects my family or town I would give freely but the further away emotionally or geographically these events happen then I feel less affinity to those "experiencing" them.

Does that make sense.
Sadly, yes, it does make sense. Amongst the floods here I was aware of the events in Brazil which were much worse. I briefly thought "oh, how awful" and switched off.


Senator Cory Bernadi has a message for the people of Australia with a petition to stop the levy.

http://www.stopthelevy.com/
Hah, noco, Senator Bernadi may not need to worry. With the massive public opposition, the Greens' fury with the elimination of the various Green initiatives, the opposition's implacable determination to vote against the levy, and now the resistance from Bob Katter and Tony Windsor, it's hard to see that the bill will get through.
 
I love how Tasmania is ticking down at $3 every 5 seconds - every other state is whizzing down! And no, I'm not picking on our Tasmanian relatives.
On closer inspection...

Queensland and Tasmania are the only states where the debt is going DOWN. Tas might only be going down rather slowly, but at least it is going down (though I have doubts this is really the case, but anyway that's what the figures say).

Meanwhile NSW, Vic, SA, WA and ACT are all going UP.

NSW - $1486 per person and rising. NSW has already privatised many key assets and is selling more.

Qld - $2460 per person but at least it is falling. But then they are selling assets and have just been flooded.

Vic - $1726 per person and rising. With so much already sold off, the state has very litte in terms of physical assets that could be sold to raise cash.

WA - $1426 per person and rising. But at least they've still got some public assets.

SA - $1135 per person and rising. Like Victoria, they've got little left to sell.

NT - $4342 per person and rising. They never did have much that could be sold.

ACT - $1276 and rising. Not sure what they've got in terms of assets.

Tas - $932 and falling. And the state still has most of its public assets in state ownership.

There doesn't seem to be much of a trend that can be drawn from all of that, other than perhaps to say that there is a correlation between higher debt per person and faster economic growth over recent years. The two states with the lowest debts are clear economic under-performers over the longer term.

Public debt boosts the economy? Seems the only real conclusion that can be made from those figures.
 
We can't have a super-duper La-Nina plus without the Lake Eyre fill-her-upperer.
 
The elephant in the room is the Qld coal industry, which has taken a massive hit from the floods. The Qld economy is dependent on coal exports, and so is Australia's to a large extent. It would make economic sense to pour taxpayers money into getting the coal exports back to normal.

This can't happen because it would enrage the Greens who blame the coal industry for the floods.

 
The economic visionaries that are the Greens are against a coal industry full stop.

They're not too keen on iron ore either, judging by the extent to which they want to tax it.
 
This can't happen because it would enrage the Greens who blame the coal industry for the floods.
Believe me there is greater demand for coal from overseas than ever before. The Aust. government now have to play a juggling act between meeting carbon emissions control responsibility and hefty tax income from coal extractors and the large employment base both direct and indirect. Jobs is money is jobs. It's a vicious circle.

Light and heat???
 
We can't have a super-duper La-Nina plus without the Lake Eyre fill-her-upperer.

Levy 3? would be nice to get some rain

.
 

Attachments

  • Levy 3.jpg
    79.2 KB · Views: 37
I saw Tony Windsor and a fly being interviewed on the 730 Report last night and for once the fly made less sense than poor ole Tony.

He is against a one off knee jerk reaction and seeks a permanent Disaster Fund. He further pointed out that revenue from the levy tax would not land in Treasury coffers for another 18 months. So he argued that a deficit strategy may be worthwhile considering.

gg
 

The non levy portion contains delays to infrastructure projects already ironically some of those will affect WA the place that currently picks up the bills for all the eastern states free loaders / welfare recipients.

The reality is the tax payer will pay for the repairs to QLD and other states infrastructure levy or no levy and in QLD case is required to start sooner rather than later.

So the question of the levy is mostly political / emotional.

Fact is I doubt Gillard will get it through the lower house so it will come from further cut backs and it will impact no doubt those who can least afford the hit unlike the levy.

Given that the $5 plus bil is an treasury estimate you would have to assume that the eventual cost will be more as is generally the case and that's not a government thing its just engineering reality.

And while I am here

The waste thing that keeps coming up is interesting in that the stimulus was handled by a set of bureaucrats not suited to the task for a whole bunch of reasons and yes that's the labor governments responsibility haste = waste.

Rebuilding the states infrastructure is different in that it will mostly be handled by departments all ready in place that do that sort of work and have decades of experience although they will be under pressure.

I am surprised that this is not realized but then if you want to be political then it wont be the out come being delays to the lives of the good people of QLD.
 

I agree with a disaster fund. Everyone who pays tax, pays something in the order of 50 cents per week. Done. People who whinge at that, tough luck, bugger off to another country!
 

Alright I am the leader of a left wing conspiracy and my mission is the conversion of the entire ASF forum to becoming sleeper agents for the eventual take over of..........

The article was negative about the government but contained points from all directions which you all seemed to have missed.

But then

The frigging headline I posted was wait a moment negative about the government ( made it bold this time you may have missed it)

Then the second paragraph I posted is shock horror negative about the government ( made it bold this time you may have missed it also)

Have to go the secret phone is ringing my Russian controller may have read this thread..........I could be in trouble.........

The baffling goes on


 
Wow, has power gone to her head? It seems she learnt nothing of voter disgust at the gang of four.

The reality is that she is an unelected PM who was only finally put in place by a couple of independents and has no mandate for anything let alone deciding on taxes in defiance of her own party, IMO.

More here: Labor MPs revolt over Julia Gillard's flood tax levy

... senior Labor figures were shaking their heads at the lack of consultation with Cabinet.
 
Interesting this is a trading site yet this seemed to have been missed


"Financial markets applaud Gillard’s flood package"

For the last few years every man and their dog, including the Opposition and a Reserve Bank board member, have called on this government to tighten its fiscal belt given the original stimulus was sized for a recession that never materialised.



Spot the west aussie in the comments section




http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/43308.html#m617796

Maybe Mike Calton is right

Whinger! Salute to another great Australian trait


http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/socie...er-great-australian-trait-20110128-1a8an.html
 
Interesting this is a trading site yet this seemed to have been missed


"Financial markets applaud Gillard’s flood package"

ASF is a Trading Site, mate, not a Financial Markets' site.

It always interests me when Big Capital and the Lost Left get in to bed with one another IF.

Usually the workers miss out, labourers, artisans, traders, teachers and other working professionals.

I dare say Financial Planners would probably agree with both you, IFocus, and the Financial Markets.

gg
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...