Julia
In Memoriam
- Joined
- 10 May 2005
- Posts
- 16,986
- Reactions
- 1,973
That says it all. So cynical, if you genuinely believe Gillard & Co "won' the election, you are utterly naive. What it came down to was which side had to cope with the greatest level of pre-existing bias from the independents who actually made the decision as to who would govern.The election result is more a reflection of the sorry state of politics in Australia than anything else.
Howard made plenty of mistakes but kept a pretty firm handle on things.
It's a pity Julia Gillard announced her flood levy after Australia Day rather than before it. Instead of spending the day telling ourselves what wonderful people Aussies are, we could have reflected on our darker side - why we're developing a Jekyll and Hyde personality.
I really like John Howard....... I had to after all he spent $100s mil telling us how good he was with overt political advertising using your money.
Then of course there was the minor matter of $9bil of give always for his last election.
Surely you mean Costello kept a firm handle on things........
sorry for being off topic
Ross Gittins take on it
Floods expose national loss of loyalty and respect for leaders
http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/polit...y-and-respect-for-leaders-20110201-1acbw.html
Labor has trashed its own brand by itself with no help from anyone. The PM who said she never wanted to be PM sits in Canberra. The Keanelly still gang runs loose in NSW raiding whats left in the public purse. Backflip Bartlett has gone home to look after the kids in Tassie ten months after being elected premier. Even Anna the heroine of the floods in Queensland has only recently finished selling off the family silver after a calling a sneaky election. The list of failures, backflips and looney schemes goes on and on. And yet we're meant to believe throwing away all of this political capital is Mr. Abbott's fault. Give us a break Ross.
SteveH. - February 02, 2011, 7:23AM
My 'pathological objection to paying more tax' is because our governments seem to have a pathological need to waste more money.
Child care rebates, first home buyer grants, BER, insulation schemes, paid maternity leave for $150K per year mums, failed submarine programs, useless secondhand US helicopters for the navy, funding programs for whatever vocal minority takes the news of the day.
Both sides do it, and we're sick of it. Get your hands out of my pockets nannies. When you've stopped wasting what you have, THEN and only THEN do you get to ask for more.
Perhaps to reason we are reluctant to accept a mandated Gillard Government levy is that we have seen the waste that occured under the Rudd Government of which Gillard was an integeral part.
The Home Insulation scheme, the BER , the various Green loans and schemes and while not directly related to the Federal Govt there is now news coming out about the poor administration of the Victorian Bushfire Recovery Fund.
Perhaps Australians would follow the leader if we trusted the leader.
To gain that trust the leader needs to at least appear to be competent.
Allan | Monaro - February 02, 2011, 7:29AM
I think that Ross overlooks the impact of modern technology and a more sophisticated population. People these days know far more about the quality of government decision making, and governments are often found wanting. I suspect the trend to question the quality of government spending really gained widespread public awareness in 1991, with the publicity given to Kerry Packer's appearance before a Senate Sub Committee where he said that "anyone in this country" who did not minimise their tax "wants his head read" because governments did not spend wisely enough to warrant taxpayers "donating extra".
FAIR GO | Queensland - February 02, 2011, 7:30AM
I donated, money that is and I want to give more. My issue is not so much a Government levy, it is that the bureaucracy will not change and a levy is to mop up much of their negligence. It is public servants who made the effect of the floods so much worse. They ignored warnings and legislated to build on flood plains. They are back to work now, doing it all over again so that it will be worse next time and the time after that. I would prefer a levy to fund a Royal Commission into planning so that bureaucrats will be forced to admit their negligence and so that we can rebuild to reduce the destruction caused by flooding rather than building to increase the destruction.
Sean | Sydney - February 02, 2011, 7:34AM
You simply do not get it. It is not about the money, it's the method and the questionable delivery if any Firstly you have the greatest mob of serial liars and economic incompetents wasting billions on bull**** feel good projects to appease the Greens and any other drongo that thinks they have a cause eg. Insulation schools cash for clunkers the NBN etc Then you have the 8 Plus Billion dollars in aid given for example in this case to Indonesia since christmas 2004/5 and all without a levy/tax why a levy/tax now. It boils down to this given of your own free will it is a gift or an act of charity taken by mandate by way of levy.tax with no option and then selectively and discriminatingly applied it is theft ...IT IS REALLY THAT SIMPLE having been forced by the Government to contribute I will now not lift a finger or donate a zac. It is me who works for and pays excessive taxes on my money and me who decides where it will go not some illegitimate Government led by an equally illegitimate Prime Minister trying to justify their position with no real claim to it all the while trying to buy votes to strengthen a very weak electoral position
My 'pathological objection to paying more tax' is because our governments seem to have a pathological need to waste more money.
Child care rebates, first home buyer grants, BER, insulation schemes, paid maternity leave for $150K per year mums, failed submarine programs, useless secondhand US helicopters for the navy, funding programs for whatever vocal minority takes the news of the day....Get your hands out of my pockets nannies. When you've stopped wasting what you have, THEN and only THEN do you get to ask for more...
...Allan | Monaro - February 02, 2011, 7:29AM
It was a response, rather than a precipitor.Is it a prerogative of all lefties to be emotive trolls
God talk about precious.:
Im with tech.
---------------------------------
I'm probably the poorest person on this forum (poorest 20% anyway) and i don't have an issue with the lousy 150 or whatever its gona cost me....and if the tables were turned id be more than happy to pay 2K if i had an income of 200K.
What is it about money and perspective?
"Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others."
What is the allowance from Centrelink actually supposed to be for?
I wouldn't have thought, given your earlier post about how well you survived the cyclone, you really had a need to claim anything from the taxpayer, gg?
Perhaps I haven't properly understood your situation.
That says it all. So cynical, if you genuinely believe Gillard & Co "won' the election, you are utterly naive. What it came down to was which side had to cope with the greatest level of pre-existing bias from the independents who actually made the decision as to who would govern.
The political and personal baggage of loathing carried by Windsor, Oakeshott, and Katter, plus the Green affiliation of the other two made it a slam dunk for Labor.
p.s. Sorry the previous post overestimated my windfall, it should be $20400
gg
People have donated money and now they get told they have to donate again through levy -- thankyou very much.
Yep, I understand that IFocus.
When we had the fires here in Vic, we had quite a few trying to rort the system, unfortunately.
I just dont understand why people dont insure themselves, bottom line.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?