Garpal Gumnut
Ross Island Hotel
- Joined
- 2 January 2006
- Posts
- 13,797
- Reactions
- 10,575
"Eco-pirate" Paul Watson is losing a race against time to recover his flagship boat, the Steve Irwin, which has been impounded in Shetland.
The world's most radical conservationist, Watson is being sued for $1.4m (£850,000) by a Maltese fishing company, Fish and Fish, one of Europe's leading tuna processors. The law suit against Watson's Sea Shepherd Conservation Society was filed last year after activists aboard the Steve Irwin freed 800 bluefin tuna from a pen in the Mediterranean.
The eco-activist boat Steve Irwin is becalmed in Scotland, sued by Tuna company Fish and Fish.
The head of Fish and Fish, Joe Caruana, seeks damages for loss of tuna off Libya, last year, by activists.
gg
Ah, Schadenfreude. I love it. It is great to see these pampered bullying thugs get their comeuppance.
because we should just let companies rape the seas and destory marine foodchains without any resistance or complaint at all!
Does the Fish and Fish company do that? Which companies do?because we should just let companies rape the seas and destory marine foodchains without any resistance or complaint at all!
Commercial fish processing ships can affect birds, whales, dolphins, turtles and sharks by their broad reach methods of catching fish.
Purse seine ships, with nets up to two kilometres in circumference, can encircle whole shoals of pelagic fish, such as mackerel, herring and tuna.
A major international scientific study released in November 2006 in the journal Science found that about one-third of all fishing stocks worldwide have collapsed (with a collapse being defined as a decline to less than 10% of their maximum observed abundance), and that if current trends continue all fish stocks worldwide will collapse within fifty years.
The FAO State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2004 report estimates that in 2003, of the main fish stocks or groups of resources for which assessment information is available, "approximately one-quarter were overexploited, depleted or recovering from depletion (16%, 7% and 1% respectively) and needed rebuilding.[3]
The threat of overfishing is not limited to the target species only. As trawlers resort to deeper and deeper waters to fill their nets, they have begun to threaten delicate deep-sea ecosystems and the fish that inhabit them, such as the coelacanth. In the May 15, 2003 issue of the journal Nature, it is estimated that 10% of large predatory fish remain compared to levels before commercial fishing.[5] Many fisheries experts, however, consider this claim to be exaggerated with respect to tuna populations.[6]
From 1950 (18 million tons) to 1969 (56 million tons) fishfood production grew by about 5% each year; from 1969 onward production has raised 8% annually.[7] It is expected that this demand will continue to rise, and MariCulture Systems estimated in 2002 that, by 2010, seafood production would have to increase by over 15.5 million tonnes to meet the desire of Earth's growing population.[1] This is likely to further aggravate the problem of overfishing, unless aquaculture technology expands to meet the needs of human population.
Overfishing has depleted fish populations to the point that large scale commercial fishing, on average around the world, is not economically viable without government assistance; EU law, however, prohibits subsidies to fleets of its member states.
The Australian orange roughy fishery was not discovered until the 1970s, but by 2008, the biomass was down to 10% of the unfished level.[9] It was the first commercially sought fish to appear on Australia's endangered species list because of overfishing
One could highlight the deforestation around the world too. Matter of fact one could highlight that every human being contributes to the situation by their very existence.but hey, out of sight, out of mind right?
because we should just let companies rape the seas and destory marine foodchains without any resistance or complaint at all!
Ummmmmmmmm it was caged Tuna right? Not wild stock that they had grabbed?
No, it was wild that had been corralled, as far as I know.
They use big nets to herd them in to an area, then fatten them up.
gg
Right ..... so instead of these fingerling Tuna being eaten by predators and dying through natural attrition in the wild they caged them and grew them out to feed the humans?
OHHHHHHHHHHHH THE HUMANITYY OF IT ALL.
We all could focus on sustainability and the current regulations regarding size, quantity, fishing times and sex may need further tightening.
Garpal Gumnut said:Sex always needs tightening
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?