- Joined
- 7 November 2007
- Posts
- 312
- Reactions
- 0
that would be 3.5 mil...
cheap... expensive... don't realy have a clue but it is for sure very possitive as this is like a owned laungh platform; where they can , in this optimised enviroment, control the test.
see page 3 of 4 ( looks like it's most likely in the bag...according man.Dir R.Phillips)
http://www.sydneybreastclinic.com.au/pdf/newsletter_winter.pdf
It is anticipated that the new system will be fully functional by the
end of this year.
These new systems will help us maintain our position as leaders
in Breast Diagnosis” said Managing Director Ron Phillips.
Does anyone know the accuracy of the current mammogram technology? Because 69% in a population is not a very good result. This means that 1 in 3 people would be misdiagnoised.
I think accuracy in the health arena is the major concern. Because if someone actually gets a mammogram or a cancer test, it means they are risk adverse and want to ensure with maximal confidence that they do not have the diesease.
Very exciting technology though. Have fermiscan released any indication of how much a test would cost approximately and how this would rate to current mammograms?
Expected to be a first line test before mammograms, biopsies and MRI tests, the Fermiscan hair test will be commercialised and made available to Australians as early as the end of this year for about $250.
Dr Mary Rickard is one of Australia's most respected chief radiologists. While mammograms are needed to pinpoint where the breast cancer is, the Fermiscan test can do something mammograms can't: detect breast cancer in women outside the 50-69 year age groups.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?