Trembling Hand
Can be found on the bid
- Joined
- 10 June 2007
- Posts
- 8,852
- Reactions
- 205
Jancha how does one insto "manipulate" it when they are competing against the others?
Do the exercises? To make a stock fall you have to sell it. Once you have sold it then what? You don't own it or worst are now short and transferred the ownership to another insto, your competitor? How is that going to help you?
A lot of traders trade on a technical basis. If thats true then why can't an insitute trigger a down trend and accumulate it back slowly at a lower cost.
The reason why i'm asking if this is possible is because of Mavericks share price of 57c.
Surely they're in a better position than they were a year ago? Perhaps the Market was expecting more i dont know.
Maybe you could shed some light on why it's being sold down then instead of asking me to do the maths on manipulation?
Well lets see this month's total shares traded:
39m traded
5 Biggest sellers (m):
Shaw 3.9
Macq insto 2.5
UBS 1
CS 1
CCZ statton -0.5
5 Biggest buyers (m):
Commonwealth 2.5
Bell potter 2.2
AIEX 1.8
RBS 0.8
CMC markets 0.7
5 biggest sellers sold 9m shares
5 biggest buyers bought 8m shares
Does that tell me anything? Nope.
Biggest buyers were commsec and bell, ie retail.
Lots of instos selling. Does this tell me anything? YES!
A lot of traders trade on a technical basis. If thats true then why can't an insitute trigger a down trend and accumulate it back slowly at a lower cost.
The reason why i'm asking if this is possible is because of Mavericks share price of 57c.
Surely they're in a better position than they were a year ago? Perhaps the Market was expecting more i dont know.
Maybe you could shed some light on why it's being sold down then instead of asking me to do the maths on manipulation?
Well lets see this month's total shares traded:
39m traded
5 Biggest sellers (m):
Shaw 3.9
Macq insto 2.5
UBS 1
CS 1
CCZ statton -0.5
5 Biggest buyers (m):
Commonwealth 2.5
Bell potter 2.2
AIEX 1.8
RBS 0.8
CMC markets 0.7
5 biggest sellers sold 9m shares
5 biggest buyers bought 8m shares
Does that tell me anything? Nope.
Biggest buyers were commsec and bell, ie retail.
Lots of instos selling. Does this tell me anything? YES!
Hi, where do you source this information from? Is it freely available? I do not know how to source such information.
A lot of traders trade on a technical basis. If thats true then why can't an insitute trigger a down trend and accumulate it back slowly at a lower cost.
When arguing with an idiot for too long it becomes hard to see which one is the idiot.
I'll leave you too it.
It maybe obvious to some but whats the difference between retailers buying and institutes selling?
Smart money selling to dumb money.
Smart money selling to dumb money.
Biggest buyers were commsec and bell, ie retail.
Lots of instos selling. Does this tell me anything? YES!
LOL! I just cannot help myself.
They are selling DOWN their holdings.
1.So now what? They don't own it.
2. How has that helped them?
3. So this is all and only for manipulation is it?
Would love to know your response to the three points.
Skyquakes post on who's buying and selling Maverick shows that Institudes aren't buying so no.
So laughing boy can you answer the question regarding to Institutes manipulating the market.
Is it possible?
You seem to forget that this a question not a statement.
The idea behind the initial question was purely about Mavericks share price and the reasons why it's down as low as 50c (as of today) and if manipulation was a possiblity.
Ok lets assume that an institution can easily manipulate the share price of MAD. Firstly can you tell me who the insto compete against?
A. retail traders.
B. other insto's
C. both?
Both
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?