This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

springhill

Make the drill work for YOU
Joined
20 June 2007
Posts
2,555
Reactions
11
DMY has executed option to transition to minerals explorer.

DMY executed the option long before the June 11 deadline, they must see something in this tenement!

Dromana executes option to acquire highly prospective copper, gold and rare earths project in Angola

● Dromana executes 3 month option to acquire Sable Minerals Pty Ltd, the 70% owner of the 3,670km² Longonjo Project in Angola;
● Previous exploration has outlined numerous high grade copper, gold and rare earth targets:
 Catabola copper/gold prospect: a mineralised structure of 1.6km in length and up to 30m wide with high grade copper intersections from sampling of underground adits, and trenches including:
● Adit 2 : 84m @ 0.81% Cu (including 6.4m @ 3.46% Cu and 5m @ 1.83% Cu)
● Adit 3: 16m @ 0.75% Cu (including 4m @ 1.79% Cu)
● Adit 2 cross cuts: 7.5m @ 3.46% Cu and 5m at 1.0 % Cu.
 Longonjo rare earth prospect: 1.75km by 3.5km outcropping high grade rare earth element prospect in a carbonatite intrusive (average grade 2.43% TREO, median grade 1.71% TREO in a range of 0.10% – 18.9% TREO).
 Bongo gold prospect: 10km long shear structure with gold in stream sampling.
● Longonjo Project is ~70km from Huambo international airport, sealed roads and a rail line running through the north of the permit linking the major port of Benguela. Infrastructure, services, facilities and labour are all well established and available within the district; and
● Dromana to commence immediate confirmatory due diligence exploration at the Longonjo Project.

From Quarterly

 Dromana technical and legal due diligence on the Longonjo Project in Angola is well underway;
 Dromana and Sable Minerals staff to arrive on site next week to prepare for the upcoming exploration program consisting of rock chip sampling,trenching and channel sampling (underground and at surface);
 Aurum Exploration Pty Ltd has been engaged to assist due diligence exploration work to commence in late April; and
 Exploration focus will be on re sampling the trench and aditto confirm the high grade copper results at Cassenha Hill which sits within the Cata bola prospect.
 
Re: DMY - Dromana Estate

HIGH GRADE COPPER RESULTS AT THE LONGONJO PROJECT

 Surface sampling returns extensive high grade copper mineralization at the Cassenha Hill copper deposit;
 Highlights of trench work include:
o 15.25m @ 2.27% Cu (including 2m at 3% Cu)
o 16m @ 1.79% Cu (including 4m @ 4.16% Cu)
o 8.3m @ 1.62% Cu (including 5m @ 2.28% Cu)
o 10m @ 1.39% Cu (including 4m @2.18% Cu)
o 6.5m @ 1.29% Cu (including 1.5m @2.45%Cu)
o 50.6m @ 0.98% Cu (including 21m @1.39% Cu)
o 12.5m @ 0.86 % Cu (including 1m @ 2.48% Cu)
 Rock chip sampling has also returned values of up to 7.15% Cu; and
 Results pending for the underground adit sampling work recently completed at Cassenha Hill workings.
 
Re: DMY - DMY Capital

On May 19th, 2015, Dromana Estate Limited changed its name to DMY Capital Limited.
 
On November 5th, 2015, DMY Capital Limited (DMY) changed its name and ASX code to Fastbrick Robotics Ltd (FBR).
 
data courtesy www.incrediblecharts.com



i have been using BRN as a surrogate, a trade-off if you like, to show the diff between the hot retail trigger pull and the investment grade liquidity

that relative exercise is still valid per the above charts
 
price breaking above the .165's on an impulsive and constructive bid will add weight to the narrative i've given

volume does not have to lift, I think volume may tend to flatten out inline with a larger middle leg
clearly, a fall back thru the box would have me out and likely see money flows head south in a big way, the evidence todate says otherwsie
 
This one has been flying under my radar but I just noticed it today. Up 11% to close at an all-time high of 20c.

No news recently but volume has really kicked up this month and the price has doubled since the end of June. Someone must need their robot bricklayers.
 
There was news!
3 July 2017 - Signs MOU with Caterpillar Inc.

http://www.asx.com.au/asx/share-price-research/company/FBR

Oooops! Sorry, missed that one. D'oh!

The MOU is "to discuss and develop a potential framework for collaboration regarding the development, manufacturing, sales, and services of Fastbrick Robotics’ robotic bricklaying technology". It's a bit vague and I'm not sure what that will mean for the bottom line.

Market cap has soared to $142 million. I'm not ready to jump in yet but will be watching from the sidelines with interest.
 
The only problem I have with it is, I think bricks have a limited time as a house building material, the push to better thermal efficiencies poses a real problem for bricks as we know them.
Foam sandwich construction seems to be gaining pace.
 
The only problem I have with it is, I think bricks have a limited time as a house building material, the push to better thermal efficiencies poses a real problem for bricks as we know them.
Foam sandwich construction seems to be gaining pace.

Yes kind of difficult to value but I am guessing the current market cap is waaaay over the top. In addition to the 664m shares listed there is a host of options (75m @ 2c) and restricted performance rights totally some 700m. Which means the true market cap is closer to $300m.

$300m for a company that has the potential to be a one trick pony? No thanks.

 
Few practical problems.

(1) Most houses have at least one side with limited access < 1 m
(2) Quoins, windows, lintels, height, lacing corners.
(3) Set up----most sites have dirt around the perimeter.
The shot looks like it needs a concrete floor.
(4) Feeding it.
(5) Brick Ties.

Would be good with very long runs if height not an issue.
These days houses are built of many products other than Brick.
 
Last edited:
SAM (semi automated mason), uses Mortar.

Is that the same company or competing company?

Seems like even if/once somebody does manage to superseed brickies it will be virtually impossible to protect the technology with patents - other machines/manufactures will just do it slightly differently.
 
It's an American company called construction robotics.
 
I have no opinion on the fast brick company, But I see the arguments against some of the new applications for robots as very short sited, the first of anything is not going to be the best, e.g. the first car was less practical than a horse, but the rate of improvement can be pretty rapid.
 

True.

Just to clarify my position: It is not my intent to diss the company. I think it's great that some companies are being innovative and as you said every innovation starts off imperfectly. It's actually done pretty good considering that it has the ears of Caterpillar despite only having what appears to be an early stage prototype. What I can't believe however is the valuation... and that's not the doing of the company itself.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more...