It's the same with most services that rely on diversity of demand.
Reminds me of the episode from South Park last night.
Smurf1976;342521The only real solution said:A point of clarification as to why that would be necessary.
If you have two or more suppliers (of anything) operating in the same market then it's inevitable that they will compete on price at least to some extent.
Now, if you're forced to compete on price they you're not going to spend a fortune on infrastructure that produces no income and will be used maybe once in 20 years. You thus won't build enough capacity to cope with a major spike in demand.
Same with anything. If you have to compete then you cater to average demand, not peak demand unless someone's paying you specifically for the reliability.
Or Smurf you turn to a bigger company that has MUCH better levels of efficiency. Then you get the best of both worlds, Cheap rates + High capacity.
ALL the retail brokers in Oz are whitebait in a very big pond. Fine for the odd purchase but useless for making money.
hahaha, how good was that?! maybe the US economy can be fixed the same way too, just unplug it and plug it back in:
Or Smurf you turn to a bigger company that has MUCH better levels of efficiency. Then you get the best of both worlds, Cheap rates + High capacity.
ALL the retail brokers in Oz are whitebait in a very big pond. Fine for the odd purchase but useless for making money.
Better reliability, cheaper brokerage ... how could you go wrong?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?