- Joined
- 27 June 2010
- Posts
- 4,202
- Reactions
- 328
Ethane Pipeline Income Fund (ASX: EPX)
The Ethane Pipeline Income Fund owns a 1375-kilometre high-pressure gas pipeline, which was purpose built to carry ethane gas from a gas-processing facility at Moomba, in South Australia's Cooper Basin, to a petrochemical plant at Botany Bay in Sydney. The pipeline was commissioned in 1996 and its technical life was estimated in the 2006 prospectus to be more than 60 years.
- Share price: $1.64
- Yield: 12% (unfranked) in 2012.
Its return on equity is forecast to rise, as are its dividends, with the fund free of debt by the end of 2012.
Source: http://www.asx.com.au/resources/investor-update-newsletter/201201-best-dividend-stocks-for-2012.htm
have had this on my radar for a while as a yield play in my SMSF
Recently the price has drop from 1.9X to bouncing around 1.76-1.80 which seems to provide a yield of around 10% based on past distributions - quidance is for the June distribution to be similar for the previous qtr.
I've been doing some digging around and can't find any news to explain the sudden drop. I know they are still waiting for Quenos to finalise their ethane supplies post 2014, but Quenos seems to be the only supplier of particular types of plastics in Australia so I'd assume they're relatively safe.
EPX is a one trick pony in that they only have one customer, but the supply contract does run till 2030, though moves from a capacity based pricing to capacity & volume based from 2015 so there is some downside risk should Quenos move some production from Botany to Victoria.
Just keep getting mesmerised by the 10% yield at the current price
does anybody know why the price fell from 1.9-->1.7 in march.
It went ex-div in late march??
Without knowing a great deal, hasn't Qenos (the sole customer) come out and said that they are in talks with other suppliers of ethane and have not yet decided whether to renew the contract with the Ethane Pipeline after 31 December 2014? It is a long-term agreement, but it is cancellable with 12 months notice.
Also noting that from October 2013 the supply agreement charges changed to be based on volume transported through the pipeline, and this means that revenue will be more volatile (see 8% decrease in volume announced last week).
Market increasingly more and more fearful about the customer concentration risk and higher volatility in earnings.
Just goes to highlight how short sighted the market was for a long time when it traded at $2.40. That was 7% yield which you could have got in any number of infrastructure / utility stock... yet people piled into something that has a single asset serving a single customer.
Anyway... if Qenos walks away, does revenue and profit fall to $0? What's their plan B? What if they just dig up the pipe and sell it as scrap... would that worth anything?
And if... Qenos say sign on for another 3 years. How much would the future cash flow worth then?
It's a problem that I can't even frame around, let alone calcuate a value. Any reference to historical prices should be thrown out of the window imo.
If the customer wants ethane then there aren't too many options for supply. Either get it from SA (via EPX) or build a new pipeline and get it from Victoria. Those are the realistic options, short of a pipeline all the way to the NT or WA, which would make no real sense at all.
But EPX is definitely hugely exposed to a single source of supply and a single user of the product.
As for alternative uses, gas storage is one option (the gas pressure in such a long pipeline itself represents a significant amount of storage). Transporting natural gas is another option, although under most scenarios that just means competing against another underutilised pipeline that runs parallel to this one. That said, if shale gas turns out to be a huge winner at Moomba (SA), or if supply was fed in from the NT or WA, and if supply from Vic is depleted, then there could be a market for additional pipeline capacity from Moomba to NSW. There's an awful lot of "ifs" there however, and some of them are quite unlikely in practice.
I'm punting that Qenos wants to keep the Botany plant operational.
Exactly
Qenos is in the plastics business and needs Ethane to make their plastics, cant import it without a gas offloading and storage facility in Botany so if they continue to operate the Botany Plant they will be doing so with Moomba gas that has to travel down the EPX pipeline.
In the event that The Botany plant closes then the EPX pipeline becomes available for NG transport to Sydney, extra capacity to that other pipeline that runs down the same corridor..it will still be a valuable asset just not a profitable one for sometime into the near future.
I'm punting that Qenos wants to keep the Botany plant operational.
I read it as saying that Qenos source the ethane from someone such as Santos who takes it from their resources projects, then EPX transports it via the pipes to Qenos.Hey S_C
When I read the announcement it sounds as though there are multiple suppliers of ethane to Qenos. Are EPX the only suppliers?
I read it as saying that Qenos source the ethane from someone such as Santos who takes it from their resources projects, then EPX transports it via the pipes to Qenos.
So in effect EPX are an intermediary, who transports it to Qenos on behalf of someone else.
Exactly
Qenos is in the plastics business and needs Ethane to make their plastics, cant import it without a gas offloading and storage facility in Botany so if they continue to operate the Botany Plant they will be doing so with Moomba gas that has to travel down the EPX pipeline.
In the event that The Botany plant closes then the EPX pipeline becomes available for NG transport to Sydney, extra capacity to that other pipeline that runs down the same corridor..it will still be a valuable asset just not a profitable one for sometime into the near future.
I'm punting that Qenos wants to keep the Botany plant operational.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?