- Joined
- 28 May 2020
- Posts
- 6,724
- Reactions
- 12,905
Google is a marketing tool.Google is a very useful tool, it is also too loyal and will learn your search preferences and then give you the finds in the order that is organised for your preferences.
When am researching I try to find multiple sources and I rephrase question. I have also found that I get different results using a Microsoft PC and an Apple iMac, the iMac security is tighter and Google can’t track my searches as well as on the PC.
Google is a marketing tool.
It will organise "finds" based on maximizing their returns from advertisers.
If users get some sort of benefit, its an accident.
Mick
Part of the problem is also finding only apples to compare.Google is a very useful tool, it is also too loyal and will learn your search preferences and then give you the finds in the order that is organised for your preferences.
When am researching I try to find multiple sources and I rephrase question. I have also found that I get different results using a Microsoft PC and an Apple iMac, the iMac security is tighter and Google can’t track my searches as well as on the PC.
Nah just 14 x12 hour shifts is plentyDo you want to visit that smelter once in the life of your vehicle, or every week for the vehicles life, because as I said before we know making battery materials has an impact, but you only have to mine the battery materials once, and then they can be almost endlessly recycled, where as the oil you burn is refined every week.
Part of the problem is also finding only apples to compare.
If you ever get a real job a rule of thumb is if the stack is really high they are pumping out some bad $hit
Yes I didn't want to make any observations, but the oldest son has been monitoring the tests since their inception, changed from originally going to go flow batteries to now going with BYD.This is VERY interesting,go past the executive summary.
The ? overall review: most have serious issues needing replacement which is not great in term of having one at home.
Disappointed by Tesla..decent robustness but capacity falling imho too fast ..so not that great for cars in future?
Redflow technology looking great as capacity seems quite constant but heaps of issues..so could be wonderful if mature.
A must read i think for purchasers
I get that John, but did you know that this link of yours only used data for January to end- April 2021?True, that's why when I searched I used multiple descriptions for my search. I also searched for 'largest battery manufacturer by ranking' and ' largest EV battery manufacturer by ranking', as well as a few other descriptions.
If you look at my posts on the previous page you will find that I included two links, one with the ranking of the largest overall battery manufacturers and the other with EV battery manufacturers. both did not include BYD in the top 3.
I get that John, but did you know that this link of yours only used data for January to end- April 2021?
The link I went to was a vehicle industry portal that needs a log-in and subscription to access more detailed info, and was supposed to reflect the situation at December. Just remember that CATL's production increased 3400% (not a typo) from 2016 to 2020, so given BYD's explosive NEV sales this year, getting to number 3 is not improbable.
Yes I didn't want to make any observations, but the oldest son has been monitoring the tests since their inception, changed from originally going to go flow batteries to now going with BYD.
The system gets installed next month, so ASF will have its own actual off grid system, to be able to follow in real time, with a family of 5 including 3 kids ranging from ,9_13.
It should be interesting.lol
That is an interesting point, in reality a vehicle has a lot of "dead" space, so chip size isn't so much an issue as it is in say a smart phone.What I have been more curious about in this regard is the role chips have played. Clearly legacy auto has been affected, but for some inexplicable reason the Chinese EV sector has powered ahead. Several months ago I watched a Chinese YouTube site and from the subtitles it was clear that a number of the Chinese automakers were partnering with Chinese chip producers using a larger platform size, rather than the nanochips used by the likes of Tesla etc. . Their thinking was that they could get the functionality they needed for the most common driver needs, (but not autonomous driving and a few other things that were relatively trivial unless you had lidar and more cameras and sensors you could poke a stick at) so went with that.
Yes, I also think with the natural advantage NCM has over LFP, that sector has been sitting on its hands somewhat and living on the legacy of the 18650.LFP & NCM batteries have differing advantages and disadvantages.
LFP can be charged to 100% every time, NCM (with the right software) is best suited to 90% charge and the occasional 100% charge. NCM will hold more energy than an equivalent sized LFP.
Tesla found this out a while ago and is why they use LFP in the standard model M3, while reserving the NCM battery for the long range (LP) and performance (P) models. Weight is similar but the range is very different.
"NCM battery features higher power rating and energy density compared to LFP battery due to its higher lithium diffusion rate and....."
This is why NCM is the preferable Cathode material for Li-ion batteries - LG Battery Blog Europe
In the past months, we often saw questions about whether NCM (Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide) is the best material for being used as cathodelghomebatteryblog.eu
now i don't focus on computers as much as a few years back but several CPU technologies have the potential to be quite flexible for example AMD were putting an impressive graphics processor inside the CPU which might not seem so fantastic until you realize that could also be a high quality maths processor instead .That is an interesting point, in reality a vehicle has a lot of "dead" space, so chip size isn't so much an issue as it is in say a smart phone.
It would be interesting if the Chinese are going off in a different direction and are actually heading toward a new design paradigm, from my understanding most cars have a central ecu, which interrogates satellite modules.
That is an interesting point, in reality a vehicle has a lot of "dead" space, so chip size isn't so much an issue as it is in say a smart phone.
It would be interesting if the Chinese are going off in a different direction and are actually heading toward a new design paradigm, from my understanding most cars have a central ecu, which interrogates satellite modules.
Looks pretty tame compared to a lot of oil refineries, they have some pretty tall stacks too, and because they are producing fuel needed daily to operate vehicles, rather than recyclable building materials needed once, there is 100’s of refineries.View attachment 134026If you ever get a real job a rule of thumb is if the stack is really high they are pumping out some bad $hit
That pretty well sums it up IMO and they all work for the same company, whichever one moves ahead will have to share its knowledge with the others I would guess.with China i think Jack Ma said it best, China has one billion brains to help solve a problem ( so they could successfully find and perfect that paradigm if they chose to )
Which is why the legacy automakers will be having so much trouble, I would guess they may be incorporating as much of their Ice electronics as possible to reduce costs, but in reality it all becomes a hinderance.The largest EV manufacturer (by a longshot) is Tesla and they are the ones that had very little issue with chips, because -
"Tesla rewrote its own software to survive the chip shortage
Jul 26, 2021
The company was able to swap substitute chips after rewriting its firmware
Tesla is weathering the global chip shortage by rewriting its vehicle software to support alternative chips, CEO Elon Musk said during an earnings call Monday. The shortage has upended the auto industry at a time of historic demand for new cars, leading to factory shutdowns, longer wait times, and higher prices.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?