Sdajii
Sdaji
- Joined
- 13 October 2009
- Posts
- 2,152
- Reactions
- 2,317
I have something more than an idea just like you. And I have an opinion that just doesn't coincide with the one your spouting here. But like the next person, I'm perfectly capable of keeping abreast with what the score is now, having access to the same sources as you whether its footage, eyewitness accounts, etc. So don't give me the holier than thou speech because you think your circumstance is "privileged".
Let's not play with terminology. We're talking about markets whether they're wet or dry (this doesn't matter) that are home to exotic, jungle, wildlife beasts in proximity to other animals and people.
Yeah well everyone has an opinion just as each has an exhaust orifice.
You're no different and are holding a flame precariously close it. So too bad if you're disgruntled or worked up about "wet", but I'm not naive to have some concept of what wet is dealing with. I'm aware it's the watering down of surfaces epsecially where meat has been cut/prepared and there's the strong implication of rampant cross-contamination.
Why nonsense? Feasible? YesEngineered in the lab is likely a nonsense. Escaped from the lab is very likely
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/apr/16/what-is-a-wet-market-coronavirus
...
The now-infamous Wuhan South China seafood market, suspected to be a primary source for spreading Covid-19 in late 2019, had a wild animal section where live and slaughtered species were for sale, including snakes, beavers, badgers, civet cats, foxes, peacocks and porcupines among other animals.
The Wuhan market was closed in January and the Chinese authorities placed a temporary ban on all trade in wildlife. But according to recent news reports, some wildlife markets in southern China have reopened amid the pandemic, selling dogs, cats, bats, lizards and scorpions among other species.
Many Chinese continue to believe in the health benefits of consuming meat from wild animals. Two leading Hong Kong microbiologists, Professor Yuen Kwok-yung and Dr David Lung, last month condemned the continuing practice of consuming wild game, warning that “Sars 3.0” could materialise if people do not refrain from eating wild animals.
And in melanesia, 100% sure in New Caledonia, but I think also in Vanuatu, Salomon islands etc:Even in Australia humans routinely eat bats, legally, and this isn't going to change.
We may never know. But the common denominator between SARS and this virus is China and these settings which are conducive to the problem. If even the Chinese authorities acknowledge it as they are back and forthing on the markets situation, there has to be something in it, whether its origin or its perpetuation.I have highlighted just one word so you can understand, "suspected".
Proof of evidence prevails.
Do you have any proof, that this virus emanated from the wet markets?
Address facts not hearsay, it helps with the discussion.
I'm not going to respond to your previous post because you keep missing the point and it's a bit repetitive. Already been through the terminology and why it doesn't matter. Wet, dry, it doesn't matter. The crux is the environment, practices of housing and chaotic mixing of pets, exotic animals, jungle meat, usually caged defecating on each other, you name it... and the cross-contamination which wouldn't be limited to but include watering down of prep surfaces in this jumbled zoo of a setting. Yeah you might consider this acceptable but that's your opinion.You realise that markets all over Asia, thousands upon thousands upon thousands of them, sell things like dog, bat, lizard, scorpion, etc, right? I've bought dogs, bats and lizards at markets across Asia (for memory I don't think I've bought scorpions at a wet market, although I've eaten a few I caught myself and have played with them at the markets). In countries neighbouring China and in other countries spread far and wide, these markets continue to operate as normal. My friends still routinely shop at them and if not for the travel bans I would be too. There are conflicting reports about the exact nature of the specific wet market in question (there were many false reports early on, including plenty of deliberate misinformation, with mainstream media in Australia even claiming such nonsense as live koalas being for sale there! I can tell you this is so far beyond untrue it's just insane), but horseshoe bats have never been sold there.
People are not going to stop eating wild animals any time soon. Anyone who has been to remote, poor areas of the world understands that, and anyone who doesn't understand it is completely naive about what exists in this world. Even in Australia humans routinely eat bats, legally, and this isn't going to change.
We may never know. But the common denominator between SARS and this virus is China and these settings which are conducive to the problem. If even the Chinese authorities acknowledge it as they are back and forthing on the markets situation, there has to be something in it.
Getting back to the economic implications, the market is still climbing toward the 6000 mark, where to from there will be interesting.
Is it a pump and dump, or does the market really believe there has been an over reaction?
And this focus on the wet market..which is the official CCP explanation is probably pure BS propaganda, even if it was mot engineered ..my view..it comes from a lab
Reading through recent comments I sense that there is an underlying message from all, that we need to make China accountable for the virus, however it was caused. How do we do we make them accountable??
The cause of the existence of the virus would be clouded (probably deliberately) and at one point blamed on as a 'natural occurrence'. This then would remove the blame from the community/nation. Was That Wet Market in particular set up as a red herring (natural cause) to hide the root cause, who knows? The wet market being reopened seems to undo the belief or excuse that the market is the root cause, due to other facts, that has exposed the 'red herring'
I agree on your last point.I doubt that anyone calling for the markets to be shut is really focused on shutting the markets but rather, the aim is to determine the truth not with absolute certainty but as far as practical.
Actions speak louder than words and whilst not absolute proof, leaving the markets open does diminish the credibility of the Chinese government's theory about them being the source of the virus.
I'm not going to respond to your previous post because you keep missing the point and it's a bit repetitive. Already been through the terminology and why it doesn't matter. Wet, dry, it doesn't matter. The crux is the environment, practices of housing and chaotic mixing of pets, exotic animals, jungle meat, usually caged defecating on each other, you name it... and the cross-contamination which wouldn't be limited to but include watering down of prep surfaces in this jumbled zoo of a setting. Yeah you might consider this acceptable but that's your opinion.
This kind of setting might not be an issue for you but at least it has the Chinese authorities paying more attention to it again. So it's not just the "wet" part per se.
Australian humans might be eating cockroaches or koalas legally or illegally but that's not the point. Again, It's the environment we're discussing. I don't see why you find that so hard to understand.
We may never know. But the common denominator between SARS and this virus is China and these settings which are conducive to the problem. If even the Chinese authorities acknowledge it as they are back and forthing on the markets situation, there has to be something in it, whether its origin or its perpetuation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?