Normal
I would agree with thatJust but there is a fine line between all candidates and final choices..many systems mine included roughly take the smallest SP first; which introduce a bias mostly to small caps..[rough approximation the smaller the SP the smaller the company..]if ranking is doing most of the filtering vs the selective being done for a smaller pool of candidates l, it can make a big difference;Hope I convey my thoughts?Anyway, I agree that the total number of trades possible vs nb of trades taken is indeed statistically relevant
I would agree with that
Just but there is a fine line between all candidates and final choices..
many systems mine included roughly take the smallest SP first; which introduce a bias mostly to small caps..
[rough approximation the smaller the SP the smaller the company..]
if ranking is doing most of the filtering vs the selective being done for a smaller pool of candidates l, it can make a big difference;
Hope I convey my thoughts?
Anyway, I agree that the total number of trades possible vs nb of trades taken is indeed statistically relevant
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.