Normal
The summation by [USER=81677]@Beaches[/USER] nailed it. At times I'm guilty of explaining the not-so-obvious with an understanding that's what's obvious to most is not obvious to all. At times readers will ask a technical question that relies on a technical answer. The (TSI) indicator raised interest with even the more seasoned readers of this thread thus a post to explain a simple indicator in terms that can be understood.Back to [USER=84784]@Wilham[/USER]Asking questions is how we learn but questions should be the last resort not the first. Searching for answers is the first port of call - having those answers clarified is another. (Education is something that is done to you. Learning is something you do for yourself)I wish to make a general observationI'm just saying - if you have a crazy idea by all means test it to death. But if you are testing a trading idea as the (BBO Strategy) that's has a zillion "Publicised Backtests Reports " with a library of books written about the implementation of the idea - why is there a need for additional confirmation of results?The internet is awash with published (BBO) code with backtest resultsPick one & if it displays a positive expectancy & you have an urge to trade - trade it with small amounts at first till your confidence & experience increase.Skate.
The summation by [USER=81677]@Beaches[/USER] nailed it.
At times I'm guilty of explaining the not-so-obvious with an understanding that's what's obvious to most is not obvious to all. At times readers will ask a technical question that relies on a technical answer. The (TSI) indicator raised interest with even the more seasoned readers of this thread thus a post to explain a simple indicator in terms that can be understood.
Back to [USER=84784]@Wilham[/USER]
Asking questions is how we learn but questions should be the last resort not the first. Searching for answers is the first port of call - having those answers clarified is another. (Education is something that is done to you. Learning is something you do for yourself)
I wish to make a general observation
I'm just saying - if you have a crazy idea by all means test it to death. But if you are testing a trading idea as the (BBO Strategy) that's has a zillion "Publicised Backtests Reports " with a library of books written about the implementation of the idea - why is there a need for additional confirmation of results?
The internet is awash with published (BBO) code with backtest results
Pick one & if it displays a positive expectancy & you have an urge to trade - trade it with small amounts at first till your confidence & experience increase.
Skate.
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.