Reply to thread

[USER=68708]@investtrader[/USER] I've also said "ad nauseam" alternative views educate, playing tennis on minor points serve no purpose without an explanation for others to understand where you are coming from.

Comments

Just making a comment: "IMH Duc's right. A 25 position system is 25 positions" is a statement that has no educational value.

So others can understand

I've explained in detail for others to understand how & why I re-balance my systems - others may do it differently, do you?

Opinions are welcomed

All I ask if others have an alternative view - post it. Whether your view is right or wrong isn't important, what's more important, this thread gives you the ability to express your views without being ridiculed or challenged.

Experience

Every member enjoys a different level of experience & expertise. When posting think of posting an "alternative view" that has educational value or if you "totally disagree" with one of my posts, explain so others understand your alternative view.

Don't ask one liners

Some members ask questions as one liner, (not all but some) & sometimes their responses are the same, it's unhelpful. It serves no educational value.

It takes time

It takes a lot of time & effort to give a measured response so all I'm asking if you have a question or making a statement detail it precisely, let me understand why you don't understand as playing tennis with others is tiresome, boring & more importantly it wastes our time.

Here is my code

maxOpenPositions = Param( "Maximum Open Positions", 28, 1, 10000, 1 );

Your basic code hasn't the feature of "on the run" re-balancing.

A photo of my parameters filter

[ATTACH=full]97707[/ATTACH]

Re-balancing

I'm unsure if re-balancing is a feature of your strategy but re-balancing plays an important part in the performance of my systems. I've given a full & detailed response to [USER=2975]@ducati916[/USER] outlining & explaining my re-balancing rules.  

Skate.