New posts

Reply to thread

Message

Was meant to be. Gets the type of responses above.

People who have written books have contributed here.These people are seen as experts,and they may well be in their field of system design.Do they trade?
Do they place serious money on the table (ASX,anyone can use play money.Vast difference investing serious money.----As I have asked a few---would you go get a $500,000 loan and invest it in your trading method?).1000's do just that to buy a home/s as an investment/s.

My questions to the experts and Radges suggestion were basically ignored.Yet Howard went to great pains initially to mention that discussion should be on topic and civil. I get annoyed when ignored ---just a personal thing.As has already been pointed out writting books doesnt necessarily equate to consistently profitable trading.

Anyone who makes a consistent profit would.Your not alone with time demands thats why simplicity is king.You'll note the T/T is recorded by Daryl every week and he takes care of house keeping.
T/Trader is not a showcase of how I trade.It is and was always an exerscise to see if a method could be systemised and traded forward to profit.
How it managed to out perform by the 100s of % in all its simplicity has been the basis for my own trading and from the mails I recieve many others.
Doesnt mean they use the system---just the building blocks,the simple yet effective ways of turning a very mediocure method into a very profitable one.It aint mathamatical genius.Its IS simple business application.

Nor do I ASX,provided in the end you or I arent inflicted with Analysis Paralysis.Ive always enjoyed sound---heated at times debate with many here and on Reefcap.You learn more.But I do get annoyed when there are just hollow comments ,heaps of nodding in unison,about some statement that sounds right but no evidence to suggest that infact it has a basis of fact.
ASX I'm not asking you or anyone to change their view.Perhaps question some things.
Capitals and bold stem from my old marketing days.

I'm asking the same and guess I'll get it from the books offered up.

Personally I think I have given the odd "something" of worth and value over the years.If nothing else---If I can trade profitably---anyone can.
Yeh yeh a raging bull market--5 yrs the market doubles plus a bit.
5 yrs initial capital increases 10 fold plus a bit.---dumb luck!

Simply sound business.

<blockquote data-quote="tech/a" data-source="post: 200325" data-attributes="member: 257">Was meant to be. Gets the type of responses above.People who have written books have contributed here.These people are seen as experts,and they may well be in their field of system design.Do they trade?Do they place serious money on the table (ASX,anyone can use play money.Vast difference investing serious money.----As I have asked a few---would you go get a $500,000 loan and invest it in your trading method?).1000&#039;s do just that to buy a home/s as an investment/s.My questions to the experts and Radges suggestion were basically ignored.Yet Howard went to great pains initially to mention that discussion should be on topic and civil. I get annoyed when ignored ---just a personal thing.As has already been pointed out writting books doesnt necessarily equate to consistently profitable trading.Anyone who makes a consistent profit would.Your not alone with time demands thats why simplicity is king.You&#039;ll note the T/T is recorded by Daryl every week and he takes care of house keeping.T/Trader is not a showcase of how I trade.It is and was always an exerscise to see if a method could be systemised and traded forward to profit.How it managed to out perform by the 100s of % in all its simplicity has been the basis for my own trading and from the mails I recieve many others.Doesnt mean they use the system---just the building blocks,the simple yet effective ways of turning a very mediocure method into a very profitable one.It aint mathamatical genius.Its IS simple business application.Nor do I ASX,provided in the end you or I arent inflicted with Analysis Paralysis.Ive always enjoyed sound---heated at times debate with many here and on Reefcap.You learn more.But I do get annoyed when there are just hollow comments ,heaps of nodding in unison,about some statement that sounds right but no evidence to suggest that infact it has a basis of fact.ASX I&#039;m not asking you or anyone to change their view.Perhaps question some things.Capitals and bold stem from my old marketing days.I&#039;m asking the same and guess I&#039;ll get it from the books offered up.Personally I think I have given the odd &quot;something&quot; of worth and value over the years.If nothing else---If I can trade profitably---anyone can.Yeh yeh a raging bull market--5 yrs the market doubles plus a bit.5 yrs initial capital increases 10 fold plus a bit.---dumb luck!Simply sound business.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tech/a, post: 200325, member: 257"] Was meant to be. Gets the type of responses above. People who have written books have contributed here.These people are seen as experts,and they may well be in their field of system design.Do they trade? Do they place serious money on the table (ASX,anyone can use play money.Vast difference investing serious money.----As I have asked a few---would you go get a $500,000 loan and invest it in your trading method?).1000's do just that to buy a home/s as an investment/s. My questions to the experts and Radges suggestion were basically ignored.Yet Howard went to great pains initially to mention that discussion should be on topic and civil. I get annoyed when ignored ---just a personal thing.As has already been pointed out writting books doesnt necessarily equate to consistently profitable trading. Anyone who makes a consistent profit would.Your not alone with time demands thats why simplicity is king.You'll note the T/T is recorded by Daryl every week and he takes care of house keeping. T/Trader is not a showcase of how I trade.It is and was always an exerscise to see if a method could be systemised and traded forward to profit. How it managed to out perform by the 100s of % in all its simplicity has been the basis for my own trading and from the mails I recieve many others. Doesnt mean they use the system---just the building blocks,the simple yet effective ways of turning a very mediocure method into a very profitable one.It aint mathamatical genius.Its IS simple business application. Nor do I ASX,provided in the end you or I arent inflicted with Analysis Paralysis.Ive always enjoyed sound---heated at times debate with many here and on Reefcap.You learn more.But I do get annoyed when there are just hollow comments ,heaps of nodding in unison,about some statement that sounds right but no evidence to suggest that infact it has a basis of fact. ASX I'm not asking you or anyone to change their view.Perhaps question some things. Capitals and bold stem from my old marketing days. I'm asking the same and guess I'll get it from the books offered up. Personally I think I have given the odd "something" of worth and value over the years.If nothing else---If I can trade profitably---anyone can. Yeh yeh a raging bull market--5 yrs the market doubles plus a bit. 5 yrs initial capital increases 10 fold plus a bit.---dumb luck! Simply sound business. [/QUOTE]

Verification