explod
explod
- Joined
- 4 March 2007
- Posts
- 7,341
- Reactions
- 1,198
On Kerry O'Brien last night, every time Julia began to make inroads on her replies he talked over the top of her many times, cut her off a number of times and did not let her complete replies.
That's because she wasn't answering the question. Do you know what an interview is? You get asked questions and you answer them, you don't trot out prepared spin about your opponent.
Has anybody spotted the difference between Joolya last week to Joolya this week?
If you quack like a duck today, I guess your quack will be the same tomorrow irrespect of whether you have lost some of your feathers or not.
I reckon she'll be a dead duck come election time as the pundits are expecting a bombshell of a leak in the last week.
So who would be the spiteful one in this, the lovely Krudd that you all adore and say should not have been toppled.
I thought it was a good interview by Kerry O'Brien. No change in Julia's style there.Actually she was on topic in answers and as O'Brien could see she was handling it well he jumped on it, time and again.
Of course when you are blinkered you will oniy see as you wish.
She is great.
On Kerry O'Brien last night, every time Julia began to make inroads on her replies he talked over the top of her many times, cut her off a number of times and did not let her complete replies. He was agressive and extremerly rude. Never acted like that when interviewing little Johnny, or krudd for that matter.
The tone of this thread is little more than spitefull sour grapes and with O'Brien and that Laurie Oakes, who was seething with rage following the debate, there is no doubt that the chauvinists are finding it difficult to be objective.
Anyway, will be interesting to see how we go with a Catholic Prime Minister, does not inspire me too much.
In this case have much more confidence in the petticoat.
Gillard inspires me, she is certainly setting things on fire and creating rages.
So who would be the spiteful one in this, the lovely Krudd that you all adore and say should not have been toppled.
Spare me the bias and give some intelligence to the debate.
Anyone would give her a big "D" for dunce.
OMG how can anyone be inspired with this woman ".
Leave Tony Alone
This guy is a dead ringer for the mad monk.
Is she? Most of the commentary I've seen is to do with how boring the whole campaign is.Gillard inspires me, she is certainly setting things on fire and creating rages.
That's because she wasn't answering the question. Do you know what an interview is? You get asked questions and you answer them, you don't trot out prepared spin about your opponent.
Oh Explod, how our existing bias allows us to see what we wish to.Actually she was on topic in answers and as O'Brien could see she was handling it well he jumped on it, time and again.
The polls indicate that approximately half the electorate disagree with you.She is great.
Now, explod, I'm going to quite politely take exception to the above.And if you cant see Julia as nice you are either under 50 years of age or all spired out.
Get back on track Macquack or stay off the thread if don't have some intelligent input.
Macquack, you have sick mind. Perhaps you need some some psychiatric help.
This thread is about whether Julia Gillard is capable of Governing this country of ours in the right direction and to date she has not shown too much promise based on her record.
Get back on track Macquack or stay off the thread if don't have some intelligent input.
Is she? Most of the commentary I've seen is to do with how boring the whole campaign is.
Oh Explod, how our existing bias allows us to see what we wish to.
Kerry O'Brien imo was not rude at all, but what he was doing was attempting to get her to actually answer his questions rather than allow her to deflect off into her usual recitation of spin. Even despite his best attempts, she managed not to answer most of his questions.
The polls indicate that approximately half the electorate disagree with you.
You think she is great. I have no idea why, but you're absolutely entitled to that view.
Now, explod, I'm going to quite politely take exception to the above.
I don't think it's at all reasonable to suggest that those of us who don't happen to agree with your unquestioning adoration of Ms Gillard don't have a view which is, like your own, simply a valid opinion. Let's leave the personal stuff out of it.
Btw what is "spired out"?
And, explod, just one more question: which Julia are you actually talking about who is so inspiring you? The Real Julia Version 1, or the Even More Real Julia Version 2? Gee whiz, there might be a Version 3 out tomorrow.
Footnote: One consolation if the Liberal Party is elected is that Noco and Calliope might shut the f*** up for the next three years.
THE Labor Party has been caught posting an incomplete transcript of a recent Julia Gillard interview on her official website...
...The party also excluded from its official record criticism of the Prime Minister's proposal for a citizens' assembly to seek a consensus on climate change policy, along with questions over whether Labor had made deals with the Greens in return for electoral preferences...
Footnote: One consolation if the Liberal Party is elected is that Noco and Calliope might shut the f*** up for the next three years.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?