I don't know what a craze is, but it sounds more complex than a cherry picker.Neighbours get it cut back once it starts rubbing against my roof.
It is a very difficult expensive process as there's no access to the tree from the road so a craze is used to hold the workers and tree in place while the work is done. Getting the large chunks of wood out is also a difficult job.
I don't know what a craze is, but it sounds more complex than a cherry picker.
How lopsided would the tree be if you did have it cut to the boundary up to full height ?
Is there then danger of it falling on their house or other infrastructure on their property during a storm ?
If that's the case, you then have a point of negotiation for removal of the whole tree although it's a negotiation that would need to be handled very delicately.
Grasslan it comes in pellets and u throw it round the base of the tree
I'd argue 1 fully grown tree is probably close to neutral benefits in terms of breaking down CO2 with the amount of leaf and bark litter they shed.
I'd also argue in my case that at least 4 house holds are blocked from installing solar PV / hot water due to the tree. I have to use lights down stairs much earlier in the evening than if that tree wasn't there blocking most of the light.
I've had to install root barriers and leaf guards to try and protect against it. It clogged up the middle gutter of my house which caused flooding in the top room of my house and the other side of the duplex during heavy rain a couple of years back. Had to rip out the carpet int he bedroom because of it.
Not much gets me riled about about my house, but the 15M+ trees that surround me sure do. Once things dry out in sydney enough I can look forward to a couple of hours clean up out the back and side of my house with what's fallen down in the foul weather.
Was it your neighbour who involved the council ?I said to the council inspector would you plant a tree this height this close to your house? He waffled on a bit and did his best question time performance of answering a different question.
Definitely if they function on allowing householders self assessment re trees which I think most councils do these days. If you and the neighbour can come to an agreement, the council probably doesn't need to be involved at all.50/50 would be pretty good for them in terms of cost split for total removal in my view. With councils, it's sometimes a case of what they don't know won't hurt them.
Definitely if they function on allowing householders self assessment re trees which I think most councils do these days. If you and the neighbour can come to an agreement, the council probably doesn't need to be involved at all.
Does using solar panels bring in more benefits or no benefits at all to household or business?
Does using solar panels bring in more benefits or no benefits at all to household or business?
Why ask when you are supposed to be the expert according to your avatar? Empyreal Energy Consultants?
Sounds like the start of a bit of spamming.
Cheers
Country Lad
So considering our annual bill was usually $1600, and we paid around $6000 - assuming we don't pay another bill, the thing should have paid for itself comfortably within 4 years. Got to be happy with that "return".
Lucky buggar
Seems quite a high FIT that you're receiving. My dad is getting < 9c kWh generated
Lucky buggar
Seems quite a high FIT that you're receiving. My dad is getting < 9c kWh generated
I currently have a system comprising:How many Kw system do you have Smurf. In NSW, single phase households are limited to a 5 Kw system.
8 x 190W panels facing 20 degrees North of true East and connected to a separate 1.1 kW inverter.
9 x 250W panels facing 20 degrees South of true West and connected to the same 1.1 kW inverter as the East facing panels.
The question that comes to my mind is how much did you gain by adding the second set of 9 x 250W panels to that 1.1kW inverter ?There are some losses from the E and W facing panels in this arrangement (losing roughly 20% of potential energy output from the E and W facing panels) but it is (1) safe and properly done and (2) financially the rational thing to do at this point.
Another question is whether the east and west facing arrays are connected to the inverter via a single or multiple strings. 1.1kW seems to be a low capacity inverter for multiple strings.similar here: you basically added two set to the same inverter shifting boths array so that they did work both jointly each in a less than optimal solution:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?