IFocus
You are arguing with a Galah
- Joined
- 8 September 2006
- Posts
- 7,670
- Reactions
- 4,761
Bloody idiots to have put it in the public domain.
But not half as stupid as the idiots on Hot Crapper.
Young adults do silly things sometimes.
These guys are being shot at on a daily basis, and every parked car could be an IED.
Give them a break.
Or, volunteer and go there yourself.
The comments are utterly stupid in the public domain, thoughtless in the extreme....
Of course they are, as are a lot of derogatory comments made on this thread by holier-than-thou armchair critics sitting in judgement of people who do their dirty work.
Yes, they should be smarter and more disciplined, but I think they are, for 18-25 year olds.I don't see why being employed by the ADF should be any different from being employed by any other organisation.
As has been pointed out, they were not conscripted, but chose to join the ADF.
In so doing they have signed up to uphold the culture of the organisation, regardless of the stresses fighting a war brings.
Other posts reportedly describe Gillard as a "f(expletive) ranga" in reference to her red hair, while one contains a photo of a soldier with Rudd in which a comment refers to the foreign minister as a "tool".
"I condemn it absolutely," Smith said, adding that the Australian Defence Force would pursue the matter vigorously.
"And that includes the possibility of disciplinary proceedings. It also includes the possibility of people who are associated or involved with this, if they are in Afghanistan, being returned home."
But former Australian Defence Force chief Peter Cosgrove said while the comments were "silly" and those involved should be counselled, any reaction needed to be kept in proportion.
General Cosgrove, chief of defence between 2002 and 2005, said the soldiers' work in Afghanistan essentially contradicted the comments.
"Every time they go outside the wire they are targets and they accept that cheerfully," he said.
"I think in Australia, across the board, there are racist elements, sadly. I don't think the Defence Force is anything other than a microcosm of the wider society."
You're missing the point. It doesn't have to do with being shocked at what they have said. I'd be surprised if they didn't engage in some pretty strong expressions of their feelings.Geez, whilst we want them to behave lets be realistic.
The fact is, they are in Afghanistan to fight a war, to kill other humans and yet we are shocked by their language and actions towards the people firing back at them. We can't really have it both ways, we dont know what its like to be somewhere where you could be shot at any moment or be driving along and have an IED blow up your vehicle.
You're missing the point. It doesn't have to do with being shocked at what they have said. I'd be surprised if they didn't engage in some pretty strong expressions of their feelings.
Rather that they should be stupid enough to put their comments out in the public domain, thus embarrassing the ADF and at least to some extent undermining what Australia is attempting to do in that part of the world.
The relevant Afghani Minister has not been backward in expressing his unhappiness.
Julia, they are AJ's, not candidates for the Nobel. Give them some slack, this is how they communicate, share photos, etc.
Its an ADF problem. These guys were just unlucky some journo got his or her paws on it.
It needs to be taken in context.
gg
Not quite there old ****. They posted it on Facebook. The scourge of society. A blight on humanity and all the known senses. Public domain stuff. Journos did not have to look very hard to find it when it is out there for all to see.
Harry Morant: Live each day as though it were your last; one day you're sure to be right. Rule 303.
Not quite there old ****. They posted it on Facebook. The scourge of society. A blight on humanity and all the known senses. Public domain stuff. Journos did not have to look very hard to find it when it is out there for all to see.
Harry Morant: Live each day as though it were your last; one day you're sure to be right. Rule 303.
Diggers accused of drug dealing as Townsville Lavarack Barracks raided Nathan Paull From: Townsville Bulletin March 28, 2011
The Lavarack Army Barracks, Townsville.
Soldier's ex alleges Afghan drug imports
Police raid Townsville army barracks
At least one soldier arrested in raid
More on army drug raids at the Townsville Bulletin
POLICE and defence force investigators have raided a north Queensland army base after claims of drug trafficking and abuse by soldiers.
In a statement, the Australian Defence Force (ADF) has confirmed it's begun an investigation into the alleged use of illicit substance by soldiers at Townsville's Lavarack Barracks.
But the whistleblower has told the Townsville Bulletin that soldiers were buying drugs cheaply in Afghanistan and on other overseas missions, before selling them for profit at home.
And the solider’s ex-partner claims the ADF has turned a blind eye to the scandal until now.
The Townsville Bulletin reports at least one soldier has been arrested and ten others were targeted in the raids on the barracks and soldiers’ homes on Saturday.
Yes, steroids.I could be wrong, I believe it is steroids, they were using.
No excuse, let us see the law take it's course, or go on to facebook for an update.
gg
Yes, steroids.
Steroids are illegal.
Like speeding.
And drink driving.
No one in Australia has ever done that.
Apparently, steroids allow you to recover faster and become stronger and more muscular.
Since the Army is involved in a competitive sport where your physique is compared against another physique and you are required to run 100m really really fast, then they have done a nasty nasty thing.
Tisk tisk, for wanting to be stronger and faster than the next man, or woman, or terrorist.
Damn, I hope we don't have these stronger and faster soldiers fighting against the Taliban.
We are doomed!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?