19 years laterAny comments on this ?
Nobody knows about this price rise .
not exactlyartificial diamond killed it.
Over
Generational: you will not sell a real diamond to a younger person if it can not be distinguished from a fake one without going under a microscope.not exactly
what really happened is Russia started sending it's diamonds to India for cutting bypassing the cartel of DeBeers
EU sanctions hard at work for them
so if you want real diamonds you pick them up in India at a realistic price ( bypassing US dollars and euros )
always preferred topaz myselfGenerational: you will not sell a real diamond to a younger person if it can not be distinguished from a fake one without going under a microscope.
And if absence of flaw is the only way to detect a fake diamond, defaults can be added....maybe already are ...
So no premium can be argued for the real stuff.
Diamond value can now be determined not by limited supply but by manufacturing production costs.
Not a store of wealth anymore.
Just a shiny piece of hard glass
A market can remain for collectors when embedded in a piece of rock...
21st-century changes
During the 20th century, De Beers used several methods to leverage its dominant position to influence the international diamond market.[19][44] First, it attempted to convince independent producers to join its single channel monopoly. When that did not work, it flooded the market with diamonds similar to those of producers who refused to join in, depressing their price and undermining return for the resistant. It also purchased and stockpiled diamonds produced by other manufacturers as well as surplus diamonds in order to control prices by limiting supply.[45] Finally, it bought diamonds when prices fell considerably naturally, to constrict supply and drive their value back up, such as during the Great Depression.[46]
In 2000, the De Beers business model changed[45] because of factors such as the decision by producers in Canada and Australia to distribute diamonds outside the De Beers channel,[19][44] as well as increasingly negative publicity surrounding blood diamonds, which forced De Beers to protect its image by limiting sales to its own mined products.[47]
The combination of a more fragmented and thus more competitive diamond market, increased transparency, and greater liquidity,[48] caused De Beers's market share of rough diamonds to fall from as high as 90% in the 1980s to 29.5% in 2019.[49][independent source needed]
Seeing these developing trends, the Oppenheimer family announced in November 2011 its intention to sell its entire 40% stake in De Beers to Anglo American plc, thereby increasing Anglo American's ownership of the company to 85% (with the remaining 15% owned by the Government of the Republic of Botswana).[2]The transaction was worth £3.2 billion (US$5.1 billion) in cash and ended the Oppenheimer dynasty's 80-year ownership of De Beers.[50][51]
In 2020, the De Beers Company released a statement of a values change, promising the world that it is committed to not using slave labor within the company.[52]
In 2025, De Beers reported holding an inventory of unsold mined diamonds valued at approximately US$2 billion. The company attributed this to a decline in demand for natural diamonds, driven in part by the growing popularity of lab-grown diamonds, which have become significantly more affordable. By 2025, lab-grown diamonds were reported to be approximately 90% less expensive than their mined counterparts, compared to a 10% price difference in 2018.[53]
i though quality lab-grown diamonds hit the market earlier than that ( but i could be wrong there )Assume the lab grown diamonds hit the market in 2022.
Looks dire for natural diamonds as an investment.
Maybe they come down to the same price as the lab grown?
View attachment 200827
Hello and welcome to Aussie Stock Forums!
To gain full access you must register. Registration is free and takes only a few seconds to complete.
Already a member? Log in here.