Holding tight, nevertheless I really am mystified by the slaughter, now down 22% from the high and I see no reason except lemming behaviour.
From memory i think it was on the interview with POE CEO Jeff Chisholm
The title of the video is "Commodities Report [11-02-07 11:30 AM ET]" :
http://www.bnn.ca/
I've just tried to have another look at it and it seems that you cannot access videos that are over a week old so maybe this one is unavailable now??
Anyways, looking at the market depth on this one is quite daunting. Alot of investors getting out . I am considering buying back in as CVN have solid fundamentals, the question is at what price will she find solid support... 48c?? 50c seems to be solid at the moment
My problem is how to get enough spare cash. That to me is something thats much harder to solve than any question I have as to what CVN shares will be worth in one-two years time.The Sirikit Oilfield covers an area of 1,039 square kilometers and started in December 1982. It produces crude oil, natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas. It has a daily production rate of 19,500 barrels of oil, 59.2 million cubic feet of natural gas and 280 tons of LPG. On the 30th December, 2003 approximately 150 million barrels of Crude from Sirikit Oil Field were produced under the operation of Thai Shell Exploration and Production Co., Ltd. before the oil field was handed over to PTTEP to carry on the operations. PTT Exploration and Production Public Co., Ltd (PTTEP) entered into a joint venture with Thai Shell with 25% share holding while Thai Shell held the remaining 75%. On January 12, 1983, PTTEP acquired all of Thai shell’s shares and assumed full operation of Sirikit Oilfield. The Sirikit Oilfield is estimated to continue supplying for about ten more years as there are at least 60 million barrels of oil and 245 billion cubic feet of natural gas yet to be recovered.
The fundamentals for CVN's worth are "the size of the reserve less its costs", it is not if a well flows 100 or 3000bopd.
What I of course meant was "recoverable reserves" less all costs (inc company running costs) or otherwise known as "Profit".This is not quite the whole picture. The reserves are meaningless if they can't be pumped and sold. They could have 500mb in the ground and it's essentially worthless till they get it out. Cash flow is the lifeblood of any business. I do, however, agree that CVN is a long-term hold.
I'm not sure I quite agree here. If you had two companies equal in every way (recoverable reserves, fixed and variable costs etc etc) except one pumped at 10,000bopd and the other pumped at 100bopd. Which would be more valuable?What I of course meant was "recoverable reserves" less all costs (inc company running costs) or otherwise known as "Profit".
You can turnover 10 billion but if your costs are 9.99 billion its pretty well useless for a shareholder to see value.
I never said it wasn't if all things where equal.I'm not sure I quite agree here. If you had two companies equal in every way (recoverable reserves, fixed and variable costs etc etc) except one pumped at 10,000bopd and the other pumped at 100bopd. Which would be more valuable?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?