I see our Chairman is extolling the success of the recent wild catch on the CSS website, can't understand why as this is of no benefit to CSS shareholders who hold no interest in the wild catch business!
Hi tge oracle, I agree investers need to be informed and it is even more important when the listed company does transactions with Pty Ltd companies that are also owed be the same players. It must be very difficult to calculate a fair price when you are buyer and seller. I checked the owner of the Sea cage leases and both CSS and CSAG own leases for sea cages, but as CSAG is a Pty Ltd company we have no way of checking what assets are included and their value. The 3.7 million loss by CSAG in one year is a concern. How did that happen? Stock loss, feed prices, slow growth? CSS should declare the full financials for the last few years of CSAG to satisfy the investors. Seems to be more than colder water temperature would cause. Have they proposed a buy out of the wild tuna catch or are you just guessing? The license for the tuna quota is worth heaps, and is the key asset for starting again.
Hello Basilica . Yes they are planning to sell the wild catch business to shareholders but only the infrastructure and assets not the licence , refer to last annual report. There has also been media spectulation about their intenetion to sell the wild catch business. For this to be accetable for me 3 thgings have to happem-
1. A share of the licence must be included.
2. It must be at a fair price.
3. The ATF ( The Stehrs ) must maintain their overwhlming shareholding in the new business.
The reason for point 3 is simple. ATF must share the same risk exposure as its other CSS shareholders. I will accept a diliution in their holding if ,and when, CSS achieves success with SBT breeding as the business will have passed the high risk.
I still cant find any reference to purchasing the wild catch business in the 07/08 annual report??? The report is just 37 pages downloaded, can you please give me a page number or tell me which section to look in?
I agree points 1 and 2 are a must and I understand your reasons for point 3 above but think it would be impossible to enforce. I also think it is causing the conflict in the first place, If the Sterns only owned 20% the shareholders vote would have meaning. I just do not like related party transactions, why not buy the quota / business from a different player? And even if they own most of the shares they could still profit with the total loss of their shares if a high enough price is paid for their ATF/related party businesses.
Sorry it is in the business update dated 30.09.08 towards the end. There was also a news article a few weeks ago concerning this potential purchase.
Thanks tge oracle, Should they have include that info in the annual report a few weeks later, considering they said "Likely acquisition of ATF SBT catch and grow business early CY2009". ??
I just hope those eggs come soon Oracle. It was the 4th of March last year that they had a spawning event, so it needs to happen soon if its going to happen this year.
I feel confident also that if they at least have a spawning now they will get fingerlings given what they have learned from their friends in Japan and Panama.
Very exciting times for the company but nerve wracking for us.
I agree. Very puzzling response to some good news. I felt the announcement was slightly vague. If they have eggs, how many? Last time they had thousands. This year they need millions. Unfortuately they have made one of their usual uninformative announcements.
Given they have angered investors in the past with some fist pumping and sensationalist announcements, they may have learned the lesson not to promise anything too early.
I know they have suffered investor ire in recent months with "you promised such and such and failed to deliver". Hagen is very quite these days, leaving Marcus to front the market. When Hagen talks about the business it is very hard not to get over enthusiastic. The man has an enviable passion for the company and a single minded work ethic to make sure the job gets done.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?